Case study on steam-assisted solvent-free microwave extraction of black pepper essential oil: Comparative performance, kinetics, and process intensification against microwave hydrodistillation

Q1 Environmental Science
Yeni Variyana , Fadian Farisan Silmi , Renova Panjaitan , Ainiya Nanda Aurunnisa , Mahfud Mahfud
{"title":"Case study on steam-assisted solvent-free microwave extraction of black pepper essential oil: Comparative performance, kinetics, and process intensification against microwave hydrodistillation","authors":"Yeni Variyana ,&nbsp;Fadian Farisan Silmi ,&nbsp;Renova Panjaitan ,&nbsp;Ainiya Nanda Aurunnisa ,&nbsp;Mahfud Mahfud","doi":"10.1016/j.cscee.2026.101355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Steam-assisted solvent-free microwave extraction (SFMES) has been proposed as an intensified alternative to microwave hydrodistillation (MHD) for essential oil recovery; however, comparative engineering evidence under harmonized operating conditions remains limited. This case study evaluates and compares the extraction performance, kinetics, and process intensification characteristics of SFMES and MHD for black pepper (<em>Piper nigrum</em> L.) essential oil production. Both extraction routes were investigated under identical microwave power (150–600 W), feed loading, and extraction time windows using a Taguchi L<sub>32</sub> experimental design. Extraction yield, recovery relative to Soxhlet reference, start-up dynamics, and physicochemical quality (ISO 3061:2008) were assessed, supported by GC–MS compositional analysis and kinetic modeling. The results demonstrate that SFMES consistently achieved higher oil yield and recovery, reaching up to 90.14 % Soxhlet-equivalent recovery, compared with 73.37 % for MHD at 600 W. Steam assistance significantly reduced first-drop time, stabilized thermal behavior at elevated microwave power, and enabled earlier attainment of extraction plateaus. Kinetic analysis revealed that SFMES followed Elovich-type behavior, indicating surface-controlled desorption, whereas MHD obeyed Power-Law kinetics characteristic of diffusion-limited liquid-phase transport. GC–MS analysis confirmed improved preservation of monoterpene-rich fractions under solvent-free steam-microwave conditions, while both methods produced oils compliant with ISO quality specifications. Hence, this case study demonstrates, using black pepper essential oil as a representative system, that steam-assisted solvent-free microwave extraction represents a practical and scalable process-intensification route for essential oil production, offering reduced processing time, improved recovery efficiency, and enhanced product quality relative to microwave hydrodistillation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34388,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 101355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666016426000344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Steam-assisted solvent-free microwave extraction (SFMES) has been proposed as an intensified alternative to microwave hydrodistillation (MHD) for essential oil recovery; however, comparative engineering evidence under harmonized operating conditions remains limited. This case study evaluates and compares the extraction performance, kinetics, and process intensification characteristics of SFMES and MHD for black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) essential oil production. Both extraction routes were investigated under identical microwave power (150–600 W), feed loading, and extraction time windows using a Taguchi L32 experimental design. Extraction yield, recovery relative to Soxhlet reference, start-up dynamics, and physicochemical quality (ISO 3061:2008) were assessed, supported by GC–MS compositional analysis and kinetic modeling. The results demonstrate that SFMES consistently achieved higher oil yield and recovery, reaching up to 90.14 % Soxhlet-equivalent recovery, compared with 73.37 % for MHD at 600 W. Steam assistance significantly reduced first-drop time, stabilized thermal behavior at elevated microwave power, and enabled earlier attainment of extraction plateaus. Kinetic analysis revealed that SFMES followed Elovich-type behavior, indicating surface-controlled desorption, whereas MHD obeyed Power-Law kinetics characteristic of diffusion-limited liquid-phase transport. GC–MS analysis confirmed improved preservation of monoterpene-rich fractions under solvent-free steam-microwave conditions, while both methods produced oils compliant with ISO quality specifications. Hence, this case study demonstrates, using black pepper essential oil as a representative system, that steam-assisted solvent-free microwave extraction represents a practical and scalable process-intensification route for essential oil production, offering reduced processing time, improved recovery efficiency, and enhanced product quality relative to microwave hydrodistillation.
蒸汽辅助无溶剂微波萃取黑胡椒精油的案例研究:与微波加氢蒸馏的性能、动力学和工艺强化比较
蒸汽辅助无溶剂微波萃取(SFMES)已被提出作为微波加氢蒸馏(MHD)的强化替代方法来回收精油。然而,在协调运行条件下的比较工程证据仍然有限。本案例研究评估和比较了SFMES和MHD在黑胡椒(Piper nigrum L.)精油生产中的提取性能、动力学和过程强化特性。采用Taguchi L32实验设计,在相同的微波功率(150-600 W)、进料载荷和提取时间窗下研究两种提取途径。在GC-MS成分分析和动力学建模的支持下,对萃取率、索氏基准回收率、启动动力学和理化质量(ISO 3061:2008)进行了评估。结果表明,SFMES持续获得更高的产油量和采收率,达到90.14%的索氏当量采收率,而600 W的MHD则为73.37%。蒸汽辅助显著缩短了首次滴入时间,在微波功率升高时稳定了热行为,并能够更早地达到萃取平台。动力学分析表明,SFMES符合elovic型行为,表明表面控制脱附,而MHD符合扩散限制液相输运的幂律动力学特征。GC-MS分析证实,在无溶剂蒸汽-微波条件下,富含单萜烯的组分得到了更好的保存,两种方法生产的油都符合ISO质量标准。因此,本案例研究表明,以黑胡椒精油为代表体系,蒸汽辅助无溶剂微波萃取是一种实用且可扩展的精油生产工艺强化路线,相对于微波加氢蒸馏,可以缩短处理时间,提高回收效率,提高产品质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering
Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书