Physical Frailty, Self-Rated Health, and All-Cause Mortality: Implications for Understanding Resilience in Aging.

Vishaldeep Kaur Sekhon,Roshni Wani,Chenkai Wu,Nadia M Chu,Qian-Li Xue
{"title":"Physical Frailty, Self-Rated Health, and All-Cause Mortality: Implications for Understanding Resilience in Aging.","authors":"Vishaldeep Kaur Sekhon,Roshni Wani,Chenkai Wu,Nadia M Chu,Qian-Li Xue","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glag067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Frailty and poor self-rated health (SRH) as potential indicators of reduced resilience are associated with all-cause mortality. However, it is lesser known whether these associations are independent of each other, physical disability or disease burden, and whether SRH remains predictive of mortality among frail older adults. We leveraged the National Health and Aging Trends Study of U.S. Medicare beneficiaries, followed annually from 2011 to 2019. Baseline assessments included physical frailty and SRH (excellent/very good, good, or fair/poor). Cox models examined associations with all-cause mortality, adjusting for demographic characteristics and comorbidities. Sensitivity analyses excluded participants with probable or possible dementia at baseline. Of the 7,425 participants at baseline, 14% were physically frail, and 25% reported fair/poor SRH. Although frailty was positively correlated with fair/poor SRH, 12% of frail participants reported excellent/very good health, and 6.6% of those with fair/poor SRH were non-frail. Over a median follow-up of 4.3 years, 29% died. Compared to non-frail participants, pre-frailty and frailty were associated with 1.4- and 2.0-fold increased hazard of mortality, respectively, after adjusting for SRH (p < 0.001); reporting good and fair/poor SRH was associated with 29% and 59% higher hazard of mortality compared to excellent/very good SRH, respectively, after adjusting for frailty (p < 0.001). Fair/poor SRH was associated with higher mortality among the frail. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. Physical frailty and SRH, while related, capture distinct aspects of health. Each independently and jointly predicts mortality, with SRH retaining prognostic value in frail individuals. Incorporating both measures may improve risk stratification and guide tailored interventions.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glag067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Frailty and poor self-rated health (SRH) as potential indicators of reduced resilience are associated with all-cause mortality. However, it is lesser known whether these associations are independent of each other, physical disability or disease burden, and whether SRH remains predictive of mortality among frail older adults. We leveraged the National Health and Aging Trends Study of U.S. Medicare beneficiaries, followed annually from 2011 to 2019. Baseline assessments included physical frailty and SRH (excellent/very good, good, or fair/poor). Cox models examined associations with all-cause mortality, adjusting for demographic characteristics and comorbidities. Sensitivity analyses excluded participants with probable or possible dementia at baseline. Of the 7,425 participants at baseline, 14% were physically frail, and 25% reported fair/poor SRH. Although frailty was positively correlated with fair/poor SRH, 12% of frail participants reported excellent/very good health, and 6.6% of those with fair/poor SRH were non-frail. Over a median follow-up of 4.3 years, 29% died. Compared to non-frail participants, pre-frailty and frailty were associated with 1.4- and 2.0-fold increased hazard of mortality, respectively, after adjusting for SRH (p < 0.001); reporting good and fair/poor SRH was associated with 29% and 59% higher hazard of mortality compared to excellent/very good SRH, respectively, after adjusting for frailty (p < 0.001). Fair/poor SRH was associated with higher mortality among the frail. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. Physical frailty and SRH, while related, capture distinct aspects of health. Each independently and jointly predicts mortality, with SRH retaining prognostic value in frail individuals. Incorporating both measures may improve risk stratification and guide tailored interventions.
体弱多病、自评健康和全因死亡率:理解衰老恢复力的意义。
虚弱和不良的自我评价健康(SRH)作为恢复力降低的潜在指标与全因死亡率相关。然而,这些关联是否相互独立,身体残疾或疾病负担,以及SRH是否仍然预测体弱老年人的死亡率,这些都不太清楚。我们利用了美国医疗保险受益人的国家健康和老龄化趋势研究,从2011年到2019年每年进行一次跟踪。基线评估包括身体虚弱和SRH(优秀/非常好,良好,或一般/差)。Cox模型检查了与全因死亡率的关系,调整了人口统计学特征和合并症。敏感性分析排除了基线时可能或可能患有痴呆的参与者。在7425名基线参与者中,14%的人身体虚弱,25%的人报告一般/较差的SRH。虽然虚弱与一般/较差的健康状况呈正相关,但12%的虚弱参与者报告健康状况良好/非常好,而一般/较差的健康状况参与者中有6.6%不虚弱。在平均4.3年的随访中,29%的患者死亡。与非虚弱的参与者相比,调整SRH后,虚弱前和虚弱分别与死亡风险增加1.4倍和2.0倍相关(p < 0.001);在调整虚弱因素后,报告良好和一般/差的SRH与优秀/非常好的SRH相比,死亡风险分别高出29%和59% (p < 0.001)。一般/较差的性生殖健康与体弱者较高的死亡率相关。敏感性分析得出了类似的结果。身体虚弱和性健康和生殖健康虽然相关,但体现了健康的不同方面。每一个独立和联合预测死亡率,与SRH保留预后价值体弱个体。结合这两种措施可以改善风险分层,并指导有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书