{"title":"Life After Death: Ethical Considerations of CPR in Brain-Dead Pediatric Organ Donors.","authors":"Jenny Kingsley,Miriam Piven Cotler,Brenda Barnum,Amy Shimada,Kailey Anber,Sabrina Derrington","doi":"10.1542/peds.2025-072297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ethical considerations surrounding organ-preserving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OP-CPR) in pediatric patients with brain death highlight tensions between preserving organ viability and respecting bodily integrity. This article explores these complexities through the case of JJ, a 12-year-old patient declared dead by neurological criteria, whose parents authorized organ donation. When JJ experienced cardiovascular collapse before organ procurement, the organ procurement organization's off-site director instructed hospital staff to perform OP-CPR, prompting ethical concerns from the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) team. This Ethics Rounds article presents 3 perspectives on OP-CPR: (1) An ethicist working for an organ procurement organization asserts that OP-CPR aligns with the family's intent and the principle of justice by increasing organ availability; (2) 2 pediatric intensive care attendings and bioethicists argue OP-CPR may not be ethically justified due to the low likelihood of achieving the primary goal, potential harm to the donor's dignity and personhood, and concerns about poor communication and lack of explicit permission; and (3) 3 nurses reveal challenges related to communication, moral distress, and institutional policies that pertain to the practice of OP-CPR. The article underscores the need for clear guidelines, improved collaboration between PICU teams and organ procurement organizations, and ethical frameworks that address both conscientious objection and conscientious commitment in the context of OP-CPR.","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2025-072297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The ethical considerations surrounding organ-preserving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OP-CPR) in pediatric patients with brain death highlight tensions between preserving organ viability and respecting bodily integrity. This article explores these complexities through the case of JJ, a 12-year-old patient declared dead by neurological criteria, whose parents authorized organ donation. When JJ experienced cardiovascular collapse before organ procurement, the organ procurement organization's off-site director instructed hospital staff to perform OP-CPR, prompting ethical concerns from the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) team. This Ethics Rounds article presents 3 perspectives on OP-CPR: (1) An ethicist working for an organ procurement organization asserts that OP-CPR aligns with the family's intent and the principle of justice by increasing organ availability; (2) 2 pediatric intensive care attendings and bioethicists argue OP-CPR may not be ethically justified due to the low likelihood of achieving the primary goal, potential harm to the donor's dignity and personhood, and concerns about poor communication and lack of explicit permission; and (3) 3 nurses reveal challenges related to communication, moral distress, and institutional policies that pertain to the practice of OP-CPR. The article underscores the need for clear guidelines, improved collaboration between PICU teams and organ procurement organizations, and ethical frameworks that address both conscientious objection and conscientious commitment in the context of OP-CPR.
期刊介绍:
The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field.
The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability.
Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights.
As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.