Factors Affecting the Clarity of Nondominant Handwriting Versus Dominant Handwriting.

IF 2.1
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand Pub Date : 2026-02-22 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI:10.1002/snz2.70000
Andrew Trotman, Matt Tyler, Hayden McAlister, Chris Button, Lech Szymanski
{"title":"Factors Affecting the Clarity of Nondominant Handwriting Versus Dominant Handwriting.","authors":"Andrew Trotman, Matt Tyler, Hayden McAlister, Chris Button, Lech Szymanski","doi":"10.1002/snz2.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We are interested in shifting writing from the dominant hand to the nondominant hand in adults that suffer from repetitive strain injuries (RSI) or stroke. Anecdotally, some adults can already write on a whiteboard using their nondominant hand. In this investigation, we examine three factors that differ between dominant writing on paper and nondominant writing on a whiteboard: orientation of the writing surface (horizontal or vertical), grip size (pen size or marker size), and handedness (dominant or nondominant). We asked 180 members of the public to write the same short phrase in all eight configurations and to rank their writing from clearest to least clear. We then manually assessed the 1440 samples for clarity. Our analysis shows that the significant factors affecting clarity are the hand used for writing and the orientation of the surface, while grip size does not affect clarity. We also find that although writing clearly with the nondominant hand on a vertical surface with a marker is not a universal trait, 14 of our 24 (58%) left-handed writers possess this skill, but no right-handed writers do.</p>","PeriodicalId":520341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand","volume":"56 1","pages":"e70000"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12965008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/snz2.70000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We are interested in shifting writing from the dominant hand to the nondominant hand in adults that suffer from repetitive strain injuries (RSI) or stroke. Anecdotally, some adults can already write on a whiteboard using their nondominant hand. In this investigation, we examine three factors that differ between dominant writing on paper and nondominant writing on a whiteboard: orientation of the writing surface (horizontal or vertical), grip size (pen size or marker size), and handedness (dominant or nondominant). We asked 180 members of the public to write the same short phrase in all eight configurations and to rank their writing from clearest to least clear. We then manually assessed the 1440 samples for clarity. Our analysis shows that the significant factors affecting clarity are the hand used for writing and the orientation of the surface, while grip size does not affect clarity. We also find that although writing clearly with the nondominant hand on a vertical surface with a marker is not a universal trait, 14 of our 24 (58%) left-handed writers possess this skill, but no right-handed writers do.

影响非优势笔迹与优势笔迹清晰度的因素。
我们感兴趣的是将书写从惯用手转移到非惯用手,在成人中遭受重复性劳损(RSI)或中风。有趣的是,一些成年人已经可以用他们的非惯用手在白板上写字了。在这项调查中,我们研究了三个不同于在纸上书写的主导和在白板上书写的非主导的因素:书写表面的方向(水平或垂直),握把大小(笔的大小或记号笔的大小)和手性(主导或非主导)。我们要求180名公众以所有八种形式写出相同的短语,并将他们的写作从清晰到不清晰进行排名。然后我们手动评估1440个样品的清晰度。我们的分析表明,影响清晰度的重要因素是用于书写的手和表面的方向,而握把大小不影响清晰度。我们还发现,虽然用非惯用手在有记号笔的垂直表面上清晰地书写并不是一个普遍的特征,但我们的24位左撇子作家中有14位(58%)拥有这种技能,而右撇子作家则没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书