Understanding the Facilitators and Barriers to Serious Illness Conversations With Older Adults: A Qualitative Analysis using the Socio-Ecological Framework.

Sage open aging Pub Date : 2026-03-04 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/30495334261429789
Eleanor Hummel, Jasmine Yun-Ting Tan, Shirlyn Hui-Shan Neo
{"title":"Understanding the Facilitators and Barriers to Serious Illness Conversations With Older Adults: A Qualitative Analysis using the Socio-Ecological Framework.","authors":"Eleanor Hummel, Jasmine Yun-Ting Tan, Shirlyn Hui-Shan Neo","doi":"10.1177/30495334261429789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Serious illnesses impact a large and growing number of older adults globally and in Singapore. Serious illness conversations (SICs) are a useful tool for clinicians to understand patients' priorities and increase alignment between priorities and care. This study aimed to understand barriers and facilitators to SICs among older adults, noting that this population is understudied yet more impacted by serious illness. In-depth interviews were conducted with older adults living with serious illnesses (<i>n</i> = 11) and family caregivers (<i>n</i> = 6). Facilitators and barriers were identified at the individual, interpersonal, institutional, and socio-cultural levels of the socio-ecological framework. Facilitators included acceptance and awareness of their condition, patient readiness and willingness, hope and support on the journey, early and careful initiation, direct communication, accessible patient-centered and high-quality care, and religious support. Barriers included limited awareness and acceptance of their condition, poor emotional well-being, uncertainty about the future, lack of provider communication, information imbalances, low support on the journey, unclear and confusing language, inaccessible and low-quality care, religious beliefs, and cultural stigmas around prognosis and decision-making. Understanding these facilitators and barriers can inform changes in policy and clinical practice to improve SICs with older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":520851,"journal":{"name":"Sage open aging","volume":"12 ","pages":"30495334261429789"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12961146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sage open aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/30495334261429789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Serious illnesses impact a large and growing number of older adults globally and in Singapore. Serious illness conversations (SICs) are a useful tool for clinicians to understand patients' priorities and increase alignment between priorities and care. This study aimed to understand barriers and facilitators to SICs among older adults, noting that this population is understudied yet more impacted by serious illness. In-depth interviews were conducted with older adults living with serious illnesses (n = 11) and family caregivers (n = 6). Facilitators and barriers were identified at the individual, interpersonal, institutional, and socio-cultural levels of the socio-ecological framework. Facilitators included acceptance and awareness of their condition, patient readiness and willingness, hope and support on the journey, early and careful initiation, direct communication, accessible patient-centered and high-quality care, and religious support. Barriers included limited awareness and acceptance of their condition, poor emotional well-being, uncertainty about the future, lack of provider communication, information imbalances, low support on the journey, unclear and confusing language, inaccessible and low-quality care, religious beliefs, and cultural stigmas around prognosis and decision-making. Understanding these facilitators and barriers can inform changes in policy and clinical practice to improve SICs with older adults.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

了解与老年人进行严重疾病对话的促进因素和障碍:使用社会生态框架的定性分析。
严重疾病影响着全球和新加坡越来越多的老年人。严重疾病对话(sic)是临床医生了解患者优先事项并增加优先事项与护理之间一致性的有用工具。这项研究旨在了解老年人的障碍和促进因素,并指出这一人群的研究不足,但更容易受到严重疾病的影响。对患有严重疾病的老年人(n = 11)和家庭照顾者(n = 6)进行了深入访谈。在社会生态框架的个人、人际、制度和社会文化层面确定了促进因素和障碍。促进因素包括接受和意识到他们的病情,病人的准备和意愿,旅途中的希望和支持,早期和仔细的开始,直接沟通,可获得的以病人为中心的高质量护理,以及宗教支持。障碍包括对其病情的认识和接受程度有限,情绪健康状况不佳,对未来的不确定性,缺乏提供者沟通,信息不平衡,旅途中支持不足,语言不清晰和令人困惑,难以获得和低质量的护理,宗教信仰,以及围绕预后和决策的文化耻辱感。了解这些促进因素和障碍可以为政策和临床实践的改变提供信息,以改善老年人的sic。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书