An umbrella review encompassing 42 systematic reviews on medical applications of ChatGPT.

Sara Ramadan, Camilla Calvieri, Abraham E Gracia-Ramos, Gabriela Roselli Ferrari, Martino Pepe, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai
{"title":"An umbrella review encompassing 42 systematic reviews on medical applications of ChatGPT.","authors":"Sara Ramadan, Camilla Calvieri, Abraham E Gracia-Ramos, Gabriela Roselli Ferrari, Martino Pepe, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4806.25.09664-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since its release, ChatGPT, which is a novel artificial intelligence (AI) tool, has become a global phenomenon with its utilization in various fields of life. In particular, ChatGPT has many potential uses in the medical field, and its evidence base is expanding momentously. We thus aimed at synthesizing the evidence on medical applications of ChatGPT. After searching several databases, 4351 articles were initially retrieved, eventually yielding that we retrieved 42 systematic reviews or meta-analyses. The main fields of applications were medical education, medical research, and actual use in clinical practice. Additional areas addressed in the literature focused on ethics issues, using ChatGPT as assistance in medical writing and research, as well as ChatGPT's demonstrated medical knowledge. While these reviews demonstrated the potential transformative role of ChatGPT in the medical field, there were also common areas of concern expressed in the articles. A frequently noted concern was inaccuracy, as well as the risk of hallucination. Other key limitations were limited validity, reliability, and privacy issues. In conclusion, the totality of evidence suggests that ChatGPT can be a valuable tool in the medical field, with favorable applications ranging from generation to dissemination and application of clinical knowledge. However, further refinements are required to ensure that its output can be directly applied to medical activities while protecting patient safety and rights.</p>","PeriodicalId":94143,"journal":{"name":"Minerva medica","volume":"117 1","pages":"26-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4806.25.09664-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since its release, ChatGPT, which is a novel artificial intelligence (AI) tool, has become a global phenomenon with its utilization in various fields of life. In particular, ChatGPT has many potential uses in the medical field, and its evidence base is expanding momentously. We thus aimed at synthesizing the evidence on medical applications of ChatGPT. After searching several databases, 4351 articles were initially retrieved, eventually yielding that we retrieved 42 systematic reviews or meta-analyses. The main fields of applications were medical education, medical research, and actual use in clinical practice. Additional areas addressed in the literature focused on ethics issues, using ChatGPT as assistance in medical writing and research, as well as ChatGPT's demonstrated medical knowledge. While these reviews demonstrated the potential transformative role of ChatGPT in the medical field, there were also common areas of concern expressed in the articles. A frequently noted concern was inaccuracy, as well as the risk of hallucination. Other key limitations were limited validity, reliability, and privacy issues. In conclusion, the totality of evidence suggests that ChatGPT can be a valuable tool in the medical field, with favorable applications ranging from generation to dissemination and application of clinical knowledge. However, further refinements are required to ensure that its output can be directly applied to medical activities while protecting patient safety and rights.

一篇涵盖了42篇关于ChatGPT医学应用的系统综述的总括性综述。
ChatGPT作为一种新型的人工智能(AI)工具,自发布以来已成为一种全球现象,其应用于生活的各个领域。特别是,ChatGPT在医疗领域有许多潜在的用途,其证据基础正在迅速扩大。因此,我们旨在综合ChatGPT的医学应用证据。在检索多个数据库后,最初检索了4351篇文章,最终我们检索了42篇系统综述或元分析。主要应用领域为医学教育、医学研究和临床实际应用。文献中涉及的其他领域集中在伦理问题上,使用ChatGPT作为医学写作和研究的辅助,以及ChatGPT展示的医学知识。虽然这些综述展示了ChatGPT在医学领域的潜在变革作用,但文章中也表达了一些共同的关注领域。一个经常被注意到的问题是不准确,以及产生幻觉的风险。其他关键限制包括有限的有效性、可靠性和隐私问题。综上所述,所有证据表明,ChatGPT在医学领域是一个有价值的工具,在临床知识的生成、传播和应用方面都有良好的应用。但是,需要进一步改进,以确保其产出能够直接应用于医疗活动,同时保护患者的安全和权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书