{"title":"Building a happy community: The relationship between community characteristics and the subjective well-being of older adults.","authors":"Ranran Li, Yibing Chen, Xunan Li, Xinyu Gao, Yixuan Liu, Ruirui Guo, Xuyang Zhao, Xiumin Zhang","doi":"10.1177/13591053261423660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As older people age and weaken physically, communities and neighborhoods become increasingly important in the lives of them. The pathways between these community factors and older adults' well-being were still unclear. This study explored the relationship and mechanisms between community public facilities, environment, and security and the subjective well-being of older residents. Data were obtained from the China Family Panel Study (CFPS). The study population consisted of 4606 older adults. This study used one-way analysis, linear regression, Shapley decomposition, and mediation analysis. The results indicated that community public facilities, environment, and security had significant positive associations with older adults' subjective well-being, with a high level of contribution; social connectedness and community sentiment played a chain mediating role in this. This pointed out the positive significance and the specific pathways of community conditions for the subjective well-being of older adults. It also provides reference for community managers and builders. Building a happy Chinese community or a happy Chinese cultural community requires consideration of the needs of the elderly regarding community factors, social interaction, and community integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"5275-5295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053261423660","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As older people age and weaken physically, communities and neighborhoods become increasingly important in the lives of them. The pathways between these community factors and older adults' well-being were still unclear. This study explored the relationship and mechanisms between community public facilities, environment, and security and the subjective well-being of older residents. Data were obtained from the China Family Panel Study (CFPS). The study population consisted of 4606 older adults. This study used one-way analysis, linear regression, Shapley decomposition, and mediation analysis. The results indicated that community public facilities, environment, and security had significant positive associations with older adults' subjective well-being, with a high level of contribution; social connectedness and community sentiment played a chain mediating role in this. This pointed out the positive significance and the specific pathways of community conditions for the subjective well-being of older adults. It also provides reference for community managers and builders. Building a happy Chinese community or a happy Chinese cultural community requires consideration of the needs of the elderly regarding community factors, social interaction, and community integration.
期刊介绍:
ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.