Professional Inclusivity: Creating Professional Development Learning Environments to Facilitate Learning Across the Health Professions.

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Maura N Polansky, Jascha de Nooijer, Goetz Fabry
{"title":"Professional Inclusivity: Creating Professional Development Learning Environments to Facilitate Learning Across the Health Professions.","authors":"Maura N Polansky, Jascha de Nooijer, Goetz Fabry","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Learning environments involving multiple health professions may provide opportunities for interprofessional learning (IPL). However, not all multiprofessional settings provide the necessary conditions to support IPL. Using the concept of professional inclusivity, this study's purpose was to explore conditions that support professionally inclusive learning environments in professional development programs, using the example of Master in Health Professions Education (MHPE) programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews with 14 students and faculty from 4 MHPE programs were conducted. Member checking of key themes was performed to enhance validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Organizing principles for supporting professionally inclusive learning environments were identified: (1) being intentional, (2) leveling the playing field, and (3) focusing on commonalities. Intentionality refers to the essential role of faculty in considering how each aspect of the program can affect inclusivity. Leveling the playing field refers to establishing a culture where students (and often faculty) are seen as equal regardless of profession. Commonalities relates to the common background of students, in both clinical and teaching experiences, and their shared educational needs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Organizing principles for fostering professional inclusivity in professional development learning environments were identified. Specific recommendations for the application of these principles are provided. Professional inclusivity may be significantly valuable as a conceptual framework for further research regarding IPL.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000641","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Learning environments involving multiple health professions may provide opportunities for interprofessional learning (IPL). However, not all multiprofessional settings provide the necessary conditions to support IPL. Using the concept of professional inclusivity, this study's purpose was to explore conditions that support professionally inclusive learning environments in professional development programs, using the example of Master in Health Professions Education (MHPE) programs.

Methods: Semistructured interviews with 14 students and faculty from 4 MHPE programs were conducted. Member checking of key themes was performed to enhance validity.

Results: Organizing principles for supporting professionally inclusive learning environments were identified: (1) being intentional, (2) leveling the playing field, and (3) focusing on commonalities. Intentionality refers to the essential role of faculty in considering how each aspect of the program can affect inclusivity. Leveling the playing field refers to establishing a culture where students (and often faculty) are seen as equal regardless of profession. Commonalities relates to the common background of students, in both clinical and teaching experiences, and their shared educational needs.

Discussion: Organizing principles for fostering professional inclusivity in professional development learning environments were identified. Specific recommendations for the application of these principles are provided. Professional inclusivity may be significantly valuable as a conceptual framework for further research regarding IPL.

专业包容性:创造专业发展学习环境,促进卫生专业的学习。
涉及多个卫生专业的学习环境可能为跨专业学习(IPL)提供机会。然而,并不是所有的多专业设置都提供了支持IPL的必要条件。本研究运用专业包容的概念,以卫生专业教育硕士项目为例,探讨专业发展项目中支持专业包容学习环境的条件。方法:对来自4个MHPE专业的14名学生和教师进行半结构化访谈。对关键主题进行成员检验,提高效度。结果:确定了支持专业包容性学习环境的组织原则:(1)有意的,(2)公平的竞争环境,(3)关注共性。意向性指的是教师在考虑项目的各个方面如何影响包容性时所起的重要作用。公平竞争指的是建立一种文化,在这种文化中,无论职业如何,学生(通常是教师)都被视为平等。共性指的是学生在临床和教学经验方面的共同背景,以及他们共同的教育需求。讨论:确定了在专业发展学习环境中促进专业包容性的组织原则。提出了适用这些原则的具体建议。专业包容性作为IPL进一步研究的概念框架可能具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书