Single-Leg Balance: Bias for the Non-Preferred Leg in Complex Tasks, But no Association with Footedness.

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of Motor Behavior Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-09 DOI:10.1080/00222895.2026.2637973
Alexandre Jehan Marcori, Matheus Giuseppe Gamberini, Matheus Felipe da Silva Freitas, Pedro Henrique Martins Monteiro, Carla Daniele Pacheco Rinaldin, Sebastian Ocklenburg, Victor Hugo Alves Okazaki
{"title":"Single-Leg Balance: Bias for the Non-Preferred Leg in Complex Tasks, But no Association with Footedness.","authors":"Alexandre Jehan Marcori, Matheus Giuseppe Gamberini, Matheus Felipe da Silva Freitas, Pedro Henrique Martins Monteiro, Carla Daniele Pacheco Rinaldin, Sebastian Ocklenburg, Victor Hugo Alves Okazaki","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2026.2637973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In unchallenging single-leg balance (SLB) tasks, the lower limbs demonstrate symmetrical control and stability. Balance asymmetries between the legs are expected to increase with task demands, being evident in complex motor tasks. In this study, we tested two hypotheses: (1) whether task complexity increases asymmetries in a single-leg balance task, and (2) whether general and specific foot preferences are correlated with performance asymmetries. Twenty-seven right-footed young adults participated by performing two tasks: (1) SLB on a stable surface (SB); and (2) SLB on an unstable surface in the anteroposterior axis (UB). Stability was provided by placing the pressure plate on the floor or on an unstable platform with a hemi-cylinder-shaped support base. Balance performance measurements were obtained through center of pressure displacement and area. Task complexity affected asymmetry direction, showing better performance with the left leg in the UB. The magnitude of asymmetries did not increase between tasks. No correlations were found between preference and performance, with preference matching the side of better performance in only ≅ 50% of the participants. These findings show that more complex motor tasks are necessary for the potential advantages of hemispheric specificity related to motor control balance mechanisms to be manifested.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"266-276"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2026.2637973","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In unchallenging single-leg balance (SLB) tasks, the lower limbs demonstrate symmetrical control and stability. Balance asymmetries between the legs are expected to increase with task demands, being evident in complex motor tasks. In this study, we tested two hypotheses: (1) whether task complexity increases asymmetries in a single-leg balance task, and (2) whether general and specific foot preferences are correlated with performance asymmetries. Twenty-seven right-footed young adults participated by performing two tasks: (1) SLB on a stable surface (SB); and (2) SLB on an unstable surface in the anteroposterior axis (UB). Stability was provided by placing the pressure plate on the floor or on an unstable platform with a hemi-cylinder-shaped support base. Balance performance measurements were obtained through center of pressure displacement and area. Task complexity affected asymmetry direction, showing better performance with the left leg in the UB. The magnitude of asymmetries did not increase between tasks. No correlations were found between preference and performance, with preference matching the side of better performance in only ≅ 50% of the participants. These findings show that more complex motor tasks are necessary for the potential advantages of hemispheric specificity related to motor control balance mechanisms to be manifested.

单腿平衡:复杂任务中非首选腿的偏倚,但与足性无关。
在无挑战性的单腿平衡(SLB)任务中,下肢表现出对称的控制和稳定性。随着任务要求的增加,双腿之间的平衡不对称也会增加,在复杂的运动任务中尤为明显。在这项研究中,我们检验了两个假设:(1)任务复杂性是否会增加单腿平衡任务中的不对称性;(2)一般和特定的足部偏好是否与表现不对称性相关。27名右脚年轻人参与了两项任务:(1)在稳定的表面上进行SLB;(2)在前后轴(UB)不稳定表面上的SLB。通过将压力板放置在地板上或带有半圆柱形支撑基座的不稳定平台上,可以提供稳定性。通过压力中心、位移和面积来测量平衡性能。任务复杂性影响不对称方向,左腿在UB中表现更好。任务之间不对称的程度并没有增加。在偏好和表现之间没有发现相关性,只有50%的参与者的偏好与更好的表现相匹配。这些发现表明,需要更复杂的运动任务才能体现与运动控制平衡机制相关的半球特异性的潜在优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Motor Behavior
Journal of Motor Behavior 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书