Clinical prevalence of collateral sensitivity: a systematic exploration of multicentre antimicrobial surveillance data

IF 20.4 1区 生物学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Lancet Microbe Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.lanmic.2025.101274
Sebastian T Tandar MSc , Laura B Zwep PhD , Sjoukje H S Woudt MSc , Annelot F Schoffelen PhD , Wiep Klaas Smits PhD , Linda B S Aulin PhD , Apostolos Liakopoulos PhD , J G Coen van Hasselt PhD
{"title":"Clinical prevalence of collateral sensitivity: a systematic exploration of multicentre antimicrobial surveillance data","authors":"Sebastian T Tandar MSc ,&nbsp;Laura B Zwep PhD ,&nbsp;Sjoukje H S Woudt MSc ,&nbsp;Annelot F Schoffelen PhD ,&nbsp;Wiep Klaas Smits PhD ,&nbsp;Linda B S Aulin PhD ,&nbsp;Apostolos Liakopoulos PhD ,&nbsp;J G Coen van Hasselt PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.lanmic.2025.101274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Collateral effects arise when resistance to one antibiotic alters the susceptibility of a bacterial strain to another antibiotic, resulting in either increased (collateral sensitivity) or decreased (collateral resistance) susceptibility. Collateral sensitivity-based antibiotic treatment offers a promising strategy against antibiotic resistance. To date, the clinical occurrence of collateral sensitivity between bacterial strains and species remains to be further evaluated. Our study aims to evaluate the occurrence patterns of collateral sensitivity in clinical settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>For this systematic exploration of multicentre antimicrobial surveillance data, we analysed large-scale antimicrobial resistance surveillance data from three datasets, covering over 5 million minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) measurements across 86 antibiotics and 30 pathogen species, to identify collateral effect interactions. Pairwise and three-way collateral effects were quantified to assess species-wide trends in both collateral sensitivity and collateral resistance within individual pathogen species. Additionally, we compared the prevalence of collateral sensitivity between and within antibiotic classes. By comparing collateral sensitivity occurrence across species, we identified collateral sensitivity interactions conserved across several pathogens.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>We found a low occurrence of collateral sensitivity in clinical strains, with 364 of 12 024 species-antibiotic pairs (3·0%) affected, compared to 5044 cases (42·0%) of collateral resistance. Most collateral sensitivity interactions involved antibiotics from different classes, except for β-lactams, which showed 41 (34·2%) of 120 occurrences of intraclass collateral sensitivity. We identified six collateral sensitivity pairs that were conserved across four bacterial species, including several highly virulent pathogens belonging to the ESKAPEE group. Three of these conserved collateral sensitivity pairs were associated with a higher MIC towards colistin. Only one three-way collateral sensitivity interaction was shared across four pathogen species. The collateral effect network generated in this study is available via a web application, enabling further data exploration and supporting future research on antibiotic collateral effects.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Several collateral sensitivity interactions were conserved across several clinically relevant pathogens. The identified collateral sensitivity pairs can be considered for the development and application of collateral sensitivity-based antibiotic therapies to prevent and reverse antimicrobial resistance.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>The Longfonds foundation and the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sport.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46633,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Microbe","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 101274"},"PeriodicalIF":20.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Microbe","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666524725002022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Collateral effects arise when resistance to one antibiotic alters the susceptibility of a bacterial strain to another antibiotic, resulting in either increased (collateral sensitivity) or decreased (collateral resistance) susceptibility. Collateral sensitivity-based antibiotic treatment offers a promising strategy against antibiotic resistance. To date, the clinical occurrence of collateral sensitivity between bacterial strains and species remains to be further evaluated. Our study aims to evaluate the occurrence patterns of collateral sensitivity in clinical settings.

Methods

For this systematic exploration of multicentre antimicrobial surveillance data, we analysed large-scale antimicrobial resistance surveillance data from three datasets, covering over 5 million minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) measurements across 86 antibiotics and 30 pathogen species, to identify collateral effect interactions. Pairwise and three-way collateral effects were quantified to assess species-wide trends in both collateral sensitivity and collateral resistance within individual pathogen species. Additionally, we compared the prevalence of collateral sensitivity between and within antibiotic classes. By comparing collateral sensitivity occurrence across species, we identified collateral sensitivity interactions conserved across several pathogens.

Findings

We found a low occurrence of collateral sensitivity in clinical strains, with 364 of 12 024 species-antibiotic pairs (3·0%) affected, compared to 5044 cases (42·0%) of collateral resistance. Most collateral sensitivity interactions involved antibiotics from different classes, except for β-lactams, which showed 41 (34·2%) of 120 occurrences of intraclass collateral sensitivity. We identified six collateral sensitivity pairs that were conserved across four bacterial species, including several highly virulent pathogens belonging to the ESKAPEE group. Three of these conserved collateral sensitivity pairs were associated with a higher MIC towards colistin. Only one three-way collateral sensitivity interaction was shared across four pathogen species. The collateral effect network generated in this study is available via a web application, enabling further data exploration and supporting future research on antibiotic collateral effects.

Interpretation

Several collateral sensitivity interactions were conserved across several clinically relevant pathogens. The identified collateral sensitivity pairs can be considered for the development and application of collateral sensitivity-based antibiotic therapies to prevent and reverse antimicrobial resistance.

Funding

The Longfonds foundation and the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sport.
临床流行的侧枝敏感性:多中心抗菌药物监测数据的系统探索。
背景:当对一种抗生素的耐药性改变了细菌菌株对另一种抗生素的敏感性,导致敏感性增加(附带敏感性)或降低(附带耐药性)时,就会产生附带效应。基于侧枝敏感性的抗生素治疗为对抗抗生素耐药性提供了一种有希望的策略。到目前为止,临床发生的细菌菌株和物种之间的侧枝敏感性仍有待进一步评估。本研究旨在评估临床侧支敏感性的发生模式。方法:为了对多中心抗菌素监测数据进行系统探索,我们分析了来自三个数据集的大规模抗菌素耐药性监测数据,涵盖了86种抗生素和30种病原体的500多万次最低抑制浓度(MIC)测量,以确定附带效应相互作用。对两两和三向侧枝效应进行量化,以评估单个病原菌种内侧枝敏感性和侧枝抗性的全种趋势。此外,我们比较了抗生素类别之间和类别内侧支敏感性的患病率。通过比较不同物种间侧枝敏感性的发生,我们确定了几种病原体之间保守的侧枝敏感性相互作用。结果:临床菌株中侧枝敏感性发生率较低,12024种抗生素对中有364例(3.0%)受影响,而侧枝耐药5044例(42.0%)。大多数侧枝敏感性相互作用涉及不同类别的抗生素,但β-内酰胺类抗生素除外,在120例侧枝敏感性中有41例(34.2%)发生。我们确定了在4种细菌物种中保守的6对侧枝敏感对,包括属于ESKAPEE组的几种高毒力病原体。其中三个保守的侧枝敏感性对对粘菌素具有较高的MIC。在四种病原菌中,只有一种三方侧络敏感性相互作用是共享的。本研究生成的附带效应网络可通过web应用程序获得,从而实现进一步的数据探索,并支持未来对抗生素附带效应的研究。解释:几种侧枝敏感性相互作用在几种临床相关病原体中是保守的。鉴定出的侧支敏感性对可用于开发和应用基于侧支敏感性的抗生素治疗,以预防和逆转抗菌素耐药性。资助:Longfonds基金会和荷兰卫生、福利和体育部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Microbe
Lancet Microbe Multiple-
CiteScore
27.20
自引率
0.80%
发文量
278
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Microbe is a gold open access journal committed to publishing content relevant to clinical microbiologists worldwide, with a focus on studies that advance clinical understanding, challenge the status quo, and advocate change in health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书