Effect of Chromostereoscopic Stimulus on Accommodative Response and Subjective Perception.

Q3 Medicine
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Pub Date : 2026-03-04 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.22599/bioj.515
Vivek Suganthan Ramasubramanian, Kartheyaeni Jothi Madhavan, Shahid Afridi Hyder Ali, Johan Raj Jeyaraj, Swetha Selvakumar
{"title":"Effect of Chromostereoscopic Stimulus on Accommodative Response and Subjective Perception.","authors":"Vivek Suganthan Ramasubramanian, Kartheyaeni Jothi Madhavan, Shahid Afridi Hyder Ali, Johan Raj Jeyaraj, Swetha Selvakumar","doi":"10.22599/bioj.515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The phenomenon of chromostereopsis, where colours are perceived at different depths due to the eye's optics, creates a potential conflict during accommodation. This prospective, cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the effect of different chromostereoscopic stimuli on the objective accommodative response and subjective user comfort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty young, healthy adults (mean age 19.83 ± 1.18 years) read text passages presented on an iPad at a 50 cm viewing distance. Stimuli included red, green, blue, yellow, and mixed-colour text on a black background, compared to a standard black-on-white baseline. Accommodative lag was measured objectively using an open-field autorefractor, while subjective ratings of perceived depth and screen readability were collected via questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant main effect of stimulus colour on accommodative lag was found (p < .001). The short-wavelength (blue) stimulus induced the greatest mean accommodative lag (0.61 D). Conversely, the long-wavelength (red) stimulus produced the smallest lag (0.18 D), indicating the most accurate accommodative focus. Subjective data strongly corroborated these findings, with blue being perceived as most distant and most difficult to read (76.67% and 73.33% of participants, respectively), while red was perceived as closest and yellow was perceived as the easiest to read (53.33%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Colour is a critical factor in visual ergonomics for dark-themed interfaces. A pure blue stimulus on a black background acts as a poor driver for accommodation, leading to significant focusing errors and a diminished perceptual experience. These findings provide a physiological basis for user interface design guidelines, suggesting that the use of short-wavelength, saturated text for reading tasks should be avoided to optimize visual comfort and performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":36083,"journal":{"name":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"73-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12962248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The phenomenon of chromostereopsis, where colours are perceived at different depths due to the eye's optics, creates a potential conflict during accommodation. This prospective, cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the effect of different chromostereoscopic stimuli on the objective accommodative response and subjective user comfort.

Methods: Thirty young, healthy adults (mean age 19.83 ± 1.18 years) read text passages presented on an iPad at a 50 cm viewing distance. Stimuli included red, green, blue, yellow, and mixed-colour text on a black background, compared to a standard black-on-white baseline. Accommodative lag was measured objectively using an open-field autorefractor, while subjective ratings of perceived depth and screen readability were collected via questionnaire.

Results: A significant main effect of stimulus colour on accommodative lag was found (p < .001). The short-wavelength (blue) stimulus induced the greatest mean accommodative lag (0.61 D). Conversely, the long-wavelength (red) stimulus produced the smallest lag (0.18 D), indicating the most accurate accommodative focus. Subjective data strongly corroborated these findings, with blue being perceived as most distant and most difficult to read (76.67% and 73.33% of participants, respectively), while red was perceived as closest and yellow was perceived as the easiest to read (53.33%).

Conclusion: Colour is a critical factor in visual ergonomics for dark-themed interfaces. A pure blue stimulus on a black background acts as a poor driver for accommodation, leading to significant focusing errors and a diminished perceptual experience. These findings provide a physiological basis for user interface design guidelines, suggesting that the use of short-wavelength, saturated text for reading tasks should be avoided to optimize visual comfort and performance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

立体色刺激对调节反应和主观知觉的影响。
目的:由于眼睛的光学系统,颜色在不同的深度被感知,这一现象在调节过程中产生了潜在的冲突。本前瞻性横断面研究旨在探讨不同立体色刺激对客观调节反应和主观用户舒适度的影响。方法:30名年轻健康成人(平均年龄19.83±1.18岁)在50 cm的观看距离上阅读iPad上呈现的文本文章。刺激物包括红色、绿色、蓝色、黄色和黑色背景上的混合色文本,与标准的黑白基线相比。调节滞后采用开场自折射镜客观测量,而主观评分的感知深度和屏幕可读性通过问卷收集。结果:刺激颜色对调节滞后有显著的主效应(p < 0.001)。短波长(蓝色)刺激诱导的平均调节滞后最大(0.61 D)。相反,长波长(红色)刺激产生的滞后最小(0.18 D),表明调节焦点最准确。主观数据有力地证实了这些发现,蓝色被认为是最遥远和最难阅读的(分别为76.67%和73.33%的参与者),而红色被认为是最接近的,黄色被认为是最容易阅读的(53.33%)。结论:颜色是深色主题界面的视觉人机工程学的关键因素。黑色背景上的纯蓝色刺激对调节的作用很差,导致明显的聚焦错误和减少的感知体验。这些发现为用户界面设计指南提供了生理基础,建议在阅读任务中应避免使用短波长、饱和的文本,以优化视觉舒适性和性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书