{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Salivary Nitric Oxide in Caries-free and Affected Children before and after Total Oral Rehabilitation.","authors":"Krishna Priya, Swagata Saha, Kavita Rai, Prajna P Nayak, Manju R Nair, Prajna Bhandary, Sharmila Kameyanda Poonacha, Nishi Joshi, Aishani Baksi","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early childhood caries (ECC) is a multifactorial disease and a major public health concern. Saliva, a noninvasive diagnostic medium, plays a vital role in oral health. Nitric oxide (NO), beyond its physiological functions, exhibits potent antimicrobial properties and may serve as a biomarker for caries activity.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To estimate salivary NO levels in children with ECC and severe ECC (S-ECC) before and after total oral rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Sixty-six physically and mentally healthy children aged 3-5 years were categorized into three groups: group I (caries-free), group II (ECC), and group III (S-ECC). Salivary NO and dietary nitrate were assessed at baseline. Groups II and III were reassessed at 1 week and 3 months postrehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline salivary NO and dietary nitrate levels were significantly higher in the caries-free group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). A significant increase in NO levels was observed in ECC and S-ECC groups at 3 months postrehabilitation (<i>p</i> < 0.05), but not at 1 week (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher NO levels in caries-free children and postrehabilitation increase in NO suggest its potential as a prognostic biomarker.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Priya K, Saha S, Rai K, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Evaluation of Salivary Nitric Oxide in Caries-free and Affected Children before and after Total Oral Rehabilitation. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2026;19(2):238-243.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"19 2","pages":"238-243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12964423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Early childhood caries (ECC) is a multifactorial disease and a major public health concern. Saliva, a noninvasive diagnostic medium, plays a vital role in oral health. Nitric oxide (NO), beyond its physiological functions, exhibits potent antimicrobial properties and may serve as a biomarker for caries activity.
Aim: To estimate salivary NO levels in children with ECC and severe ECC (S-ECC) before and after total oral rehabilitation.
Design: Sixty-six physically and mentally healthy children aged 3-5 years were categorized into three groups: group I (caries-free), group II (ECC), and group III (S-ECC). Salivary NO and dietary nitrate were assessed at baseline. Groups II and III were reassessed at 1 week and 3 months postrehabilitation.
Results: Baseline salivary NO and dietary nitrate levels were significantly higher in the caries-free group (p < 0.05). A significant increase in NO levels was observed in ECC and S-ECC groups at 3 months postrehabilitation (p < 0.05), but not at 1 week (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Higher NO levels in caries-free children and postrehabilitation increase in NO suggest its potential as a prognostic biomarker.
How to cite this article: Priya K, Saha S, Rai K, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Salivary Nitric Oxide in Caries-free and Affected Children before and after Total Oral Rehabilitation. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2026;19(2):238-243.