CT perfusion ischemic core predicts PH-2 hemorrhagic transformation following intravenous alteplase bridging treatment prior to endovascular thrombectomy.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Pub Date : 2026-03-04 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864261425623
Asaf Honig, Aviva Alpernas, Yoel Schwartzmann, Hen Hallevi, Issa Metanis, Einor Ben-Assayag, Tali Jonas-Kimchi, Udi Sadeh, Hamza Jubran, Oz Haim, Jose Cohen, Ronen R Leker, Jeremy Molad
{"title":"CT perfusion ischemic core predicts PH-2 hemorrhagic transformation following intravenous alteplase bridging treatment prior to endovascular thrombectomy.","authors":"Asaf Honig, Aviva Alpernas, Yoel Schwartzmann, Hen Hallevi, Issa Metanis, Einor Ben-Assayag, Tali Jonas-Kimchi, Udi Sadeh, Hamza Jubran, Oz Haim, Jose Cohen, Ronen R Leker, Jeremy Molad","doi":"10.1177/17562864261425623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) administered as a bridging therapy prior to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke may increase the risk of hemorrhagic-transformation (HT). CT-perfusion (CTP) imaging enables quantitative assessment of ischemic core and penumbral tissue and may support individualized hemorrhagic risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether baseline CTP-defined ischemic core parameters are associated with parenchymal-hematoma type 2 (PH-2) following bridging IVT before EVT.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational-cohort-study.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with large-vessel occlusion treated within 4 h of symptom onset at two tertiary stroke centers between 2017 and 2023 were analyzed. All patients underwent baseline CTP imaging. Outcomes were compared between patients treated with IVT plus EVT and those treated with direct-EVT. HT was assessed on 24-h follow-up noncontrast-CT using ECASS-2 criteria. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of PH-2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 398 patients (50.6% male), 180 received IVT + EVT (mean age 70.2 ± 15.0 years) and 218 underwent direct-EVT (69.5 ± 14.5 years). Baseline characteristics, workflow times, thrombectomy passes, and reperfusion rates were comparable. PH-2 was associated with higher mortality (43.8% vs 11.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and worse 90-day functional outcome (median modified Rankin Score 4 (2-6) vs 3 (1-4), <i>p</i> = 0.002). Bridging-IVT was associated with higher PH-2 rates compared with direct EVT (6.1% vs 2.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.036), without increased symptomatic intracranial-hemorrhage. In sensitivity analyses, bridging-IVT was associated with higher PH-2 rates only in patients with any ischemic core (7.8% vs 1.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.014), core volume >10 mL (8.8% vs 0.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.004), and >20 mL (8.7% vs 1.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Penumbral volume was not associated with PH-2. In multivariable analysis, any ischemic core (odds ratio (OR) 12.67, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and core volume >10 mL (OR 11.12, <i>p</i> = 0.034) independently predicted PH-2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Baseline CTP-defined ischemic core volume is strongly associated with severe HT following bridging intravenous alteplase prior to EVT and may inform individualized risk-benefit assessment of bridging therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"19 ","pages":"17562864261425623"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12961106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864261425623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) administered as a bridging therapy prior to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke may increase the risk of hemorrhagic-transformation (HT). CT-perfusion (CTP) imaging enables quantitative assessment of ischemic core and penumbral tissue and may support individualized hemorrhagic risk stratification.

Objectives: To assess whether baseline CTP-defined ischemic core parameters are associated with parenchymal-hematoma type 2 (PH-2) following bridging IVT before EVT.

Design: Observational-cohort-study.

Data sources and methods: Consecutive patients with large-vessel occlusion treated within 4 h of symptom onset at two tertiary stroke centers between 2017 and 2023 were analyzed. All patients underwent baseline CTP imaging. Outcomes were compared between patients treated with IVT plus EVT and those treated with direct-EVT. HT was assessed on 24-h follow-up noncontrast-CT using ECASS-2 criteria. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of PH-2.

Results: Among 398 patients (50.6% male), 180 received IVT + EVT (mean age 70.2 ± 15.0 years) and 218 underwent direct-EVT (69.5 ± 14.5 years). Baseline characteristics, workflow times, thrombectomy passes, and reperfusion rates were comparable. PH-2 was associated with higher mortality (43.8% vs 11.7%, p < 0.001) and worse 90-day functional outcome (median modified Rankin Score 4 (2-6) vs 3 (1-4), p = 0.002). Bridging-IVT was associated with higher PH-2 rates compared with direct EVT (6.1% vs 2.0%, p = 0.036), without increased symptomatic intracranial-hemorrhage. In sensitivity analyses, bridging-IVT was associated with higher PH-2 rates only in patients with any ischemic core (7.8% vs 1.5%, p = 0.014), core volume >10 mL (8.8% vs 0.8%, p = 0.004), and >20 mL (8.7% vs 1.3%, p = 0.03). Penumbral volume was not associated with PH-2. In multivariable analysis, any ischemic core (odds ratio (OR) 12.67, p = 0.02) and core volume >10 mL (OR 11.12, p = 0.034) independently predicted PH-2.

Conclusion: Baseline CTP-defined ischemic core volume is strongly associated with severe HT following bridging intravenous alteplase prior to EVT and may inform individualized risk-benefit assessment of bridging therapy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

CT灌注缺血核心预测静脉阿替普酶桥接治疗后PH-2出血转化血管内取栓。
背景:静脉溶栓(IVT)作为急性缺血性卒中血管内取栓(EVT)前的桥接治疗可能增加出血性转化(HT)的风险。ct -灌注(CTP)成像能够定量评估缺血核心和半影组织,并可能支持个体化出血风险分层。目的:评估基线ctp定义的缺血性核心参数是否与EVT前桥接IVT后2型实质血肿(PH-2)相关。设计:Observational-cohort-study。数据来源和方法:分析2017年至2023年在两个三级脑卒中中心连续治疗的大血管闭塞患者,患者在症状出现后4小时内接受治疗。所有患者均行基线CTP成像。比较IVT + EVT治疗和直接EVT治疗的患者的结果。采用ECASS-2标准在24小时随访非对比ct上评估HT。采用多变量logistic回归确定PH-2的独立预测因子。结果:398例患者(男性50.6%)中,IVT + EVT 180例(平均年龄70.2±15.0岁),直接EVT 218例(69.5±14.5岁)。基线特征、工作时间、取栓次数和再灌注率具有可比性。PH-2与较高的死亡率相关(43.8% vs 11.7%, p p = 0.002)。与直接EVT相比,桥接- ivt与更高的PH-2率相关(6.1% vs 2.0%, p = 0.036),没有增加症状性颅内出血。在敏感性分析中,桥接- ivt与较高的PH-2率相关的患者仅存在于任何缺血性核心(7.8% vs 1.5%, p = 0.014),核心容量>0 mL (8.8% vs 0.8%, p = 0.004)和>20 mL (8.7% vs 1.3%, p = 0.03)。半影体积与PH-2无关。在多变量分析中,任何缺血核(比值比(OR) 12.67, p = 0.02)和核体积bbb10ml (OR 11.12, p = 0.034)独立预测PH-2。结论:基线ctp定义的缺血性核心体积与EVT前静脉注射阿替普酶桥接后的严重HT密切相关,可能为桥接治疗的个体化风险-收益评估提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书