Assessment of construct validity and reliability of the Canadian Ultra-Processed Product Screener.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Virginie Hamel, Sara Desmarais, Sharon Kirkpatrick, Jane Y Polsky, Carmen Byker Shanks, Maria Laura da Costa Louzada, Lana Vanderlee, David Hamond, Didier Gariguet, Jean-Claude Moubarac
{"title":"Assessment of construct validity and reliability of the Canadian Ultra-Processed Product Screener.","authors":"Virginie Hamel, Sara Desmarais, Sharon Kirkpatrick, Jane Y Polsky, Carmen Byker Shanks, Maria Laura da Costa Louzada, Lana Vanderlee, David Hamond, Didier Gariguet, Jean-Claude Moubarac","doi":"10.1017/S1368980026102304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Canadian Ultra-Processed Product Screener (CUPS) was developed to rapidly assess ultra-processed food (UPF) and drink product intake among Canadian adults. The CUPS is an online self-administered screener that includes twenty-eight questions and assesses the intake of a variety of UPF available in Canada, both in French and English. This study aimed to assess the construct validity and reliability of the CUPS among a sample of adults in Canada.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study (between July and November 2023).</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Participants completed the online CUPS screener in three versions (1-d (twice), 7-d and 30-d CUPS) and three 24-h dietary recalls (24HR) (the reference measure) over the course of 26-28 d.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>354 Canadians aged 18-60 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CUPS had an acceptable construct validity, with moderate correlation coefficients between the CUPS score and UPF consumption level measured using multiple 24HR (from 0·33 to 0·44). Reproducibility was also acceptable (intraclass correlation = 0·61) and internal consistency ranged from good to excellent (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0·72 for the 1-d and 0·86 for the 30-d CUPS). CUPS scores were also associated with higher intake of added sugars, saturated fats and Na.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides evidence supporting the construct validity and reliability of the CUPS among Canadian adults. The CUPS is useful for identifying low and high consumers of UPF and could serve as a proxy measure for one key dimension of diet quality, which is the type of food processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"e69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13087981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980026102304","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Canadian Ultra-Processed Product Screener (CUPS) was developed to rapidly assess ultra-processed food (UPF) and drink product intake among Canadian adults. The CUPS is an online self-administered screener that includes twenty-eight questions and assesses the intake of a variety of UPF available in Canada, both in French and English. This study aimed to assess the construct validity and reliability of the CUPS among a sample of adults in Canada.

Design: Cross-sectional study (between July and November 2023).

Settings: Participants completed the online CUPS screener in three versions (1-d (twice), 7-d and 30-d CUPS) and three 24-h dietary recalls (24HR) (the reference measure) over the course of 26-28 d.

Participants: 354 Canadians aged 18-60 years.

Results: The CUPS had an acceptable construct validity, with moderate correlation coefficients between the CUPS score and UPF consumption level measured using multiple 24HR (from 0·33 to 0·44). Reproducibility was also acceptable (intraclass correlation = 0·61) and internal consistency ranged from good to excellent (Cronbach's α = 0·72 for the 1-d and 0·86 for the 30-d CUPS). CUPS scores were also associated with higher intake of added sugars, saturated fats and Na.

Conclusions: This study provides evidence supporting the construct validity and reliability of the CUPS among Canadian adults. The CUPS is useful for identifying low and high consumers of UPF and could serve as a proxy measure for one key dimension of diet quality, which is the type of food processing.

加拿大超加工产品筛选器的结构效度与信度评估。
目的:开发加拿大超加工产品筛选器(CUPS)以快速评估加拿大成年人的超加工食品和饮料产品(UPF)摄入量。CUPS是一个在线自我管理的筛选程序,包括28个问题,并评估加拿大提供的各种UPF的摄入量,包括法语和英语。本研究旨在评估加拿大成人问卷的结构效度和信度。设计:横断面研究(2023年7月至11月)。设置:参与者在26至28天的时间内完成了三个版本的在线CUPS筛查(1天(两次),7天和30天的CUPS)和三次24小时饮食回忆(24HR)(参考测量)。参与者:354名年龄在18至60岁之间的加拿大人。结果:CUPS具有可接受的结构效度,CUPS得分与多次24HR测量的UPF消耗水平之间存在适度的相关系数(0.33 ~ 0.44)。重复性也可接受(类内相关性= 0.61),内部一致性从好到优(1天的Cronbach's alpha = 0.72, 30天的CUPS = 0.86)。CUPS得分还与添加糖、饱和脂肪和钠的摄入量较高有关。结论:本研究为加拿大成人CUPS的结构效度和信度提供了证据。CUPS可用于识别UPF的低消费者和高消费者,并可作为饮食质量的一个关键维度(即食品加工类型)的代理度量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书