Beyond single metrics: Multi-parameter home-cage monitoring improves welfare assessment.

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Laboratory Animals Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-09 DOI:10.1177/00236772251374406
Steven R Talbot, René H Tolba, André Bleich
{"title":"Beyond single metrics: Multi-parameter home-cage monitoring improves welfare assessment.","authors":"Steven R Talbot, René H Tolba, André Bleich","doi":"10.1177/00236772251374406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Single outcome measures often fall short of the sensitivity and objectivity expected under European Directive 2010/63, particularly in fast progressing disease models. To address this gap, the German Research Foundation consortium FOR2591 collated data from 55 routinely used models in six species and narrowed more than 50 candidate readouts down to a 15-parameter core panel spanning behaviour, physiology, biochemistry and imaging. Quantitative tools such as the Composite Measure Schemes, the endpointR and the Relative Severity Assessment algorithm fuse these multidimensional streams into more objective severity scores that outperform singular readouts such as body weight change and clinical scoring in detecting early distress and refine humane endpoint decisions. More than 10 external laboratories have already integrated the open-source toolbox, illustrating practical scalability. A consortium survey showed that no single metric is both widely applied and consistently valued, underscoring the need for multi-parameter monitoring. Ongoing Phase III analyses extract model specific digital fingerprints that trigger real-time risk alerts in home-cage systems. By providing a shared yet adaptable framework, FOR2591 charts a feasible path toward Directive 2010/63 compliance, improved model validity and individualized animal care, establishing a path of a more evidence-based severity assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":18013,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Animals","volume":" ","pages":"20-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13219768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772251374406","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Single outcome measures often fall short of the sensitivity and objectivity expected under European Directive 2010/63, particularly in fast progressing disease models. To address this gap, the German Research Foundation consortium FOR2591 collated data from 55 routinely used models in six species and narrowed more than 50 candidate readouts down to a 15-parameter core panel spanning behaviour, physiology, biochemistry and imaging. Quantitative tools such as the Composite Measure Schemes, the endpointR and the Relative Severity Assessment algorithm fuse these multidimensional streams into more objective severity scores that outperform singular readouts such as body weight change and clinical scoring in detecting early distress and refine humane endpoint decisions. More than 10 external laboratories have already integrated the open-source toolbox, illustrating practical scalability. A consortium survey showed that no single metric is both widely applied and consistently valued, underscoring the need for multi-parameter monitoring. Ongoing Phase III analyses extract model specific digital fingerprints that trigger real-time risk alerts in home-cage systems. By providing a shared yet adaptable framework, FOR2591 charts a feasible path toward Directive 2010/63 compliance, improved model validity and individualized animal care, establishing a path of a more evidence-based severity assessment.

超越单一指标:多参数家庭笼监测改善福利评估。
单一结果衡量标准往往达不到欧洲指令2010/63所期望的敏感性和客观性,特别是在快速进展的疾病模型中。为了解决这一差距,德国研究基金会联盟FOR2591整理了来自6个物种的55个常规使用模型的数据,并将50多个候选读数缩小到15个参数的核心小组,涵盖行为,生理学,生物化学和成像。诸如复合测量方案、终点和相对严重程度评估算法等定量工具将这些多维流融合成更客观的严重程度评分,在检测早期痛苦和改进人道终点决策方面优于单一读数(如体重变化和临床评分)。超过10个外部实验室已经集成了开源工具箱,说明了实际的可扩展性。一项联合调查显示,没有一个单一的指标既被广泛应用,又得到一致的重视,这强调了多参数监测的必要性。正在进行的第三阶段分析提取模型特定的数字指纹,从而触发家庭笼系统中的实时风险警报。通过提供共享但适应性强的框架,FOR2591为实现指令2010/63的合规性,提高模型有效性和个性化动物护理绘制了可行的路径,建立了更基于证据的严重性评估路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laboratory Animals
Laboratory Animals 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal of laboratory animal science and welfare, Laboratory Animals publishes peer-reviewed original papers and reviews on all aspects of the use of animals in biomedical research. The journal promotes improvements in the welfare or well-being of the animals used, it particularly focuses on research that reduces the number of animals used or which replaces animal models with in vitro alternatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书