Pekka Varje, Ari Väänänen, Olli Haavisto, Ilkka Kivimäki, Simo Taimela, Tiina Kalliomäki-Levanto
{"title":"Machine learning in the analysis of mental health at work: a scoping review.","authors":"Pekka Varje, Ari Väänänen, Olli Haavisto, Ilkka Kivimäki, Simo Taimela, Tiina Kalliomäki-Levanto","doi":"10.1093/joccuh/uiag014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review aims to assess the role of machine learning in workplace mental health research by systematically analyzing existing studies to understand current methodologies, applications, and trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including Ebsco, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, PsycINFO, IEEE, and ACM, screening a total of 5600 abstracts. Altogether, we analyzed 92 journal articles, conference papers, and book chapters published before September 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Since 2020, there has been a notable increase in publications on the topic. Studies have mainly employed cross-sectional designs (73%) and workplace questionnaires (51%) targeting specific occupational groups (67%), particularly from Asia excluding China (41%). Supervised learning methods, such as Random Forest and Neural Networks, have been frequently utilized to investigate conditions like depression, burnout, and anxiety. Most studies predicting mental health at work using machine learning are currently conducted by data scientists as single-measurement studies, whereas longitudinal studies from medicine, epidemiology, social sciences, or behavioral sciences are comparatively rare. In the context of machine learning, prediction denotes the model's ability to infer outcomes based on input data. However, most publications do not systematically analyze the temporal dynamics of mental health or forecast mental health outcomes from an epidemiological perspective.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The application of machine learning in occupational mental health research remains in its preliminary stages, with a primary focus on methodology and computer science. The review highlights the necessity for interdisciplinary collaboration to fully leverage the potential of machine learning in advancing occupational health research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiag014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This scoping review aims to assess the role of machine learning in workplace mental health research by systematically analyzing existing studies to understand current methodologies, applications, and trends.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including Ebsco, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, PsycINFO, IEEE, and ACM, screening a total of 5600 abstracts. Altogether, we analyzed 92 journal articles, conference papers, and book chapters published before September 2025.
Results: Since 2020, there has been a notable increase in publications on the topic. Studies have mainly employed cross-sectional designs (73%) and workplace questionnaires (51%) targeting specific occupational groups (67%), particularly from Asia excluding China (41%). Supervised learning methods, such as Random Forest and Neural Networks, have been frequently utilized to investigate conditions like depression, burnout, and anxiety. Most studies predicting mental health at work using machine learning are currently conducted by data scientists as single-measurement studies, whereas longitudinal studies from medicine, epidemiology, social sciences, or behavioral sciences are comparatively rare. In the context of machine learning, prediction denotes the model's ability to infer outcomes based on input data. However, most publications do not systematically analyze the temporal dynamics of mental health or forecast mental health outcomes from an epidemiological perspective.
Conclusions: The application of machine learning in occupational mental health research remains in its preliminary stages, with a primary focus on methodology and computer science. The review highlights the necessity for interdisciplinary collaboration to fully leverage the potential of machine learning in advancing occupational health research.
目的:本综述旨在通过系统分析现有研究来评估机器学习在工作场所心理健康研究中的作用,以了解当前的方法、应用和趋势。方法:对Ebsco、Scopus、ProQuest、Web of Science、PsycINFO、IEEE、ACM等数据库进行综合检索,共筛选5600篇摘要。我们总共分析了2025年9月之前发表的92篇期刊文章、会议论文和书籍章节。结果:自2020年以来,关于该主题的出版物显著增加。研究主要采用横断面设计(73%)和工作场所问卷调查(51%),针对特定的职业群体(67%),特别是来自亚洲(41%)。监督学习方法,如随机森林和神经网络,经常用于调查抑郁、倦怠和焦虑等情况。目前,大多数使用机器学习预测工作场所心理健康的研究都是由数据科学家进行的单一测量研究,而医学、流行病学、社会科学或行为科学的纵向研究相对较少。在机器学习的上下文中,预测是指模型根据输入数据推断结果的能力。然而,大多数出版物没有系统地分析精神健康的时间动态或从流行病学角度预测精神健康结果。结论:机器学习在职业心理健康研究中的应用仍处于初级阶段,主要侧重于方法论和计算机科学。该综述强调了跨学科合作的必要性,以充分利用机器学习在推进职业健康研究中的潜力。
期刊介绍:
The scope of the journal is broad, covering toxicology, ergonomics, psychosocial factors and other relevant health issues of workers, with special emphasis on the current developments in occupational health. The JOH also accepts various methodologies that are relevant to investigation of occupational health risk factors and exposures, such as large-scale epidemiological studies, human studies employing biological techniques and fundamental experiments on animals, and also welcomes submissions concerning occupational health practices and related issues.