Reframing advisory as leadership to promote equity in trauma-informed community-engaged research: A case study of Yolo County, CA.

IF 2.7 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2026-02-10 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2026.10693
Leigh Ann Simmons, Jasmine Cuellar, Jennifer Phipps
{"title":"Reframing advisory as leadership to promote equity in trauma-informed community-engaged research: A case study of Yolo County, CA.","authors":"Leigh Ann Simmons, Jasmine Cuellar, Jennifer Phipps","doi":"10.1017/cts.2026.10693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community engagement that emphasizes shared leadership is essential in clinical and translational science, and language, naming, and framing have the potential to shape power dynamics. This study explored how renaming and restructuring a Community Advisory Board (CAB) into a Community Leadership Board (CLB) could strengthen a trauma-informed network of care (TINoC) by elevating community power, cultural responsiveness, and equitable participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guided by the Trauma and Resilience Informed Research Principles and Practice(TRIRPP) framework, we established a paid CLB in Yolo County, California, composed of six individuals who identified as members of groups underrepresented in science. We reviewed timesheets and TINoC products and conducted an inductive thematic analysis of meeting minutes to determine the CLB's main areas of influence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CLB met 25 times over two years, provided iterative feedback on more than a dozen educational materials, clinical workflows, trauma-informed trainings, and communication strategies, and co-presented at community meetings. Eight recurring areas of influence were identified: trauma-informed ACE screening, accessibility, workflow feasibility, community- and patient-centered feedback, health communication, participant compensation, engagement, and post-screening navigation. CLB members highlighted gaps not identified by the academic and community members of the TINoC, including translation accuracy, time allowed for ACE screening, and ensuring voluntary patient participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Renaming the CLB as a \"leadership\" body signaled a shift in accountability, deepened engagement, and underscored how naming practices can drive more equitable translational research. Virtual-only meetings potentially limited the representativeness of the CLB; however, results suggest naming is a critical component of trauma-informed community-engaged research(CEnR).</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"e34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12964070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2026.10693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community engagement that emphasizes shared leadership is essential in clinical and translational science, and language, naming, and framing have the potential to shape power dynamics. This study explored how renaming and restructuring a Community Advisory Board (CAB) into a Community Leadership Board (CLB) could strengthen a trauma-informed network of care (TINoC) by elevating community power, cultural responsiveness, and equitable participation.

Methods: Guided by the Trauma and Resilience Informed Research Principles and Practice(TRIRPP) framework, we established a paid CLB in Yolo County, California, composed of six individuals who identified as members of groups underrepresented in science. We reviewed timesheets and TINoC products and conducted an inductive thematic analysis of meeting minutes to determine the CLB's main areas of influence.

Results: The CLB met 25 times over two years, provided iterative feedback on more than a dozen educational materials, clinical workflows, trauma-informed trainings, and communication strategies, and co-presented at community meetings. Eight recurring areas of influence were identified: trauma-informed ACE screening, accessibility, workflow feasibility, community- and patient-centered feedback, health communication, participant compensation, engagement, and post-screening navigation. CLB members highlighted gaps not identified by the academic and community members of the TINoC, including translation accuracy, time allowed for ACE screening, and ensuring voluntary patient participation.

Conclusions: Renaming the CLB as a "leadership" body signaled a shift in accountability, deepened engagement, and underscored how naming practices can drive more equitable translational research. Virtual-only meetings potentially limited the representativeness of the CLB; however, results suggest naming is a critical component of trauma-informed community-engaged research(CEnR).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

重塑咨询作为领导促进创伤知情社区参与研究的公平性:加利福尼亚州约洛县的案例研究。
背景:强调共同领导的社区参与在临床和转化科学中是必不可少的,语言、命名和框架有可能塑造权力动态。本研究探讨了如何将社区咨询委员会(CAB)重新命名和重组为社区领导委员会(CLB),从而通过提升社区权力、文化响应和公平参与来加强创伤知情护理网络(TINoC)。方法:在创伤和恢复力知情研究原则和实践(TRIRPP)框架的指导下,我们在加利福尼亚州Yolo县建立了一个付费CLB,由6名被认为是科学界代表性不足群体的成员组成。我们审查了时间表和TINoC产品,并对会议纪要进行了归纳性专题分析,以确定CLB的主要影响领域。结果:CLB在两年内召开了25次会议,就十几种教育材料、临床工作流程、创伤知情培训和沟通策略提供了反复反馈,并在社区会议上共同发表。确定了八个反复出现的影响领域:创伤知情ACE筛查、可及性、工作流程可行性、以社区和患者为中心的反馈、健康沟通、参与者补偿、参与和筛查后导航。CLB成员强调了TINoC的学术和社区成员没有发现的差距,包括翻译的准确性、ACE筛查的时间,以及确保患者自愿参与。结论:将CLB重新命名为“领导”机构标志着问责制的转变,参与的加深,并强调命名实践如何推动更公平的翻译研究。纯虚拟会议可能会限制劳工事务局的代表性;然而,结果表明,命名是创伤知情社区参与研究(CEnR)的关键组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书