Elif Yılmaz Biçer, Merve Bankoğlu Güngör, Cemal Aydın
{"title":"Effects of Substructure Color and Restoration Thickness on the Final Color of Ultra-Translucent Zirconia Ceramics","authors":"Elif Yılmaz Biçer, Merve Bankoğlu Güngör, Cemal Aydın","doi":"10.1111/jerd.70138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effects of substructure color and restoration thickness on the final color of shade-gradient ultra-translucent zirconia ceramics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 180 flat-shaped ultra-translucent zirconia specimens (5Y-PSZ) with thicknesses of 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 mm (<i>n</i> = 60) were fabricated and cemented onto composite substructures in six colors (A1, A2, B1, B2, C2, D2). Color parameters were measured before and after cementation, and color differences (Δ<i>E</i>\n <sub>00</sub>) were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula. The data were evaluated using the two-way repeated measures of ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis, Tukey HSD, and Bonferroni tests (<i>α</i> = 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Substructure color and restoration thickness had significant effects on Δ<i>E</i>\n <sub>00</sub> (<i>p</i> < 0.001) after cementation, with values exceeding the acceptability threshold (1.8) in all groups. Before and after cementation, A2 remained below the acceptability threshold relative to target color A1 and B2 achieved acceptable color matching with increased thickness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Restoration thickness and substructure color significantly influenced the final color of shade-gradient zirconia ceramics. A2 provided better color matching, while B2 required a minimum thickness of 0.8 mm for acceptable results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Significance</h3>\n \n <p>Increased zirconia thickness enhances masking of darker substructures. Additionally, the influence of the substructure color must be carefully considered, particularly in thinner ultra-translucent zirconia ceramics, to ensure predictable, harmonious color matching.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":"38 9","pages":"1773-1783"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jerd.70138","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jerd.70138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effects of substructure color and restoration thickness on the final color of shade-gradient ultra-translucent zirconia ceramics.
Material and Methods
A total of 180 flat-shaped ultra-translucent zirconia specimens (5Y-PSZ) with thicknesses of 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 mm (n = 60) were fabricated and cemented onto composite substructures in six colors (A1, A2, B1, B2, C2, D2). Color parameters were measured before and after cementation, and color differences (ΔE00) were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula. The data were evaluated using the two-way repeated measures of ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis, Tukey HSD, and Bonferroni tests (α = 0.05).
Results
Substructure color and restoration thickness had significant effects on ΔE00 (p < 0.001) after cementation, with values exceeding the acceptability threshold (1.8) in all groups. Before and after cementation, A2 remained below the acceptability threshold relative to target color A1 and B2 achieved acceptable color matching with increased thickness.
Conclusions
Restoration thickness and substructure color significantly influenced the final color of shade-gradient zirconia ceramics. A2 provided better color matching, while B2 required a minimum thickness of 0.8 mm for acceptable results.
Clinical Significance
Increased zirconia thickness enhances masking of darker substructures. Additionally, the influence of the substructure color must be carefully considered, particularly in thinner ultra-translucent zirconia ceramics, to ensure predictable, harmonious color matching.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features.
The range of topics covered in the journal includes:
- Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts
- Implants
- Conservative adhesive restorations
- Tooth Whitening
- Prosthodontic materials and techniques
- Dental materials
- Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics
- Esthetics related research
- Innovations in esthetics