Inter-observer variability for detection of suspected ileocolonic Crohn's disease with magnetic resonance enterography.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-09 DOI:10.1177/02841851261422702
Jacob Broder Brodersen, Michael Dam Jensen, Mathias Byriel, Claus Dam, Martina Loft, Søren Rafael Rafaelsen
{"title":"Inter-observer variability for detection of suspected ileocolonic Crohn's disease with magnetic resonance enterography.","authors":"Jacob Broder Brodersen, Michael Dam Jensen, Mathias Byriel, Claus Dam, Martina Loft, Søren Rafael Rafaelsen","doi":"10.1177/02841851261422702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMagnetic resonance enterography (MRE) can visualize Crohn's disease (CD) and its complications.PurposeTo determine the inter-observer agreement for the detection of ileocolonic CD.Material and MethodsThis post-hoc analysis included MRE scans from 48 patients selected from a prospective, blinded multicenter study of patients with suspected CD. Based on ileocolonoscopy in the main study, CD was diagnosed in 39 (81%) patients, with colonic involvement in 36 (69%). Two senior radiologists and two junior doctors undergoing specialist training, blinded to clinical data assessed the image quality, CD presence, and disease severity.ResultsThe inter-observer agreement for CD detection varied by location: terminal ileum (κ = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.63-0.89), colon (κ = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.42-0.74), and ileocolon (κ = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.49-0.80). Agreement was higher among senior radiologists than juniors: terminal ileum (κ = 0.83 vs. 0.73; <i>P</i> = 0.60) and colon (κ = 0.73 vs. 0.41; <i>P</i> = 0.11), though differences were not statistically significant. The inter-observer agreement for disease severity was poor to moderate with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of 0.51 (95% CI = 0.35-0.67) for the MaRIA and 0.46 (95% CI = 0.29-0.62) for the simplified MaRIA. Senior radiologists showed higher consistency, with moderate to good agreement: ICC of 0.69 for the MaRIA, 0.70 for the simplified MaRIA, and 0.80 for bowel wall thickness.ConclusionIn early CD, MRE demonstrated moderate to substantial inter-observer agreement for ileocolonic evaluation. Limitations in colonic assessment likely reflect early disease detection rather than observer variability, highlighting the need for a complementary assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"418-425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851261422702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMagnetic resonance enterography (MRE) can visualize Crohn's disease (CD) and its complications.PurposeTo determine the inter-observer agreement for the detection of ileocolonic CD.Material and MethodsThis post-hoc analysis included MRE scans from 48 patients selected from a prospective, blinded multicenter study of patients with suspected CD. Based on ileocolonoscopy in the main study, CD was diagnosed in 39 (81%) patients, with colonic involvement in 36 (69%). Two senior radiologists and two junior doctors undergoing specialist training, blinded to clinical data assessed the image quality, CD presence, and disease severity.ResultsThe inter-observer agreement for CD detection varied by location: terminal ileum (κ = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.63-0.89), colon (κ = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.42-0.74), and ileocolon (κ = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.49-0.80). Agreement was higher among senior radiologists than juniors: terminal ileum (κ = 0.83 vs. 0.73; P = 0.60) and colon (κ = 0.73 vs. 0.41; P = 0.11), though differences were not statistically significant. The inter-observer agreement for disease severity was poor to moderate with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of 0.51 (95% CI = 0.35-0.67) for the MaRIA and 0.46 (95% CI = 0.29-0.62) for the simplified MaRIA. Senior radiologists showed higher consistency, with moderate to good agreement: ICC of 0.69 for the MaRIA, 0.70 for the simplified MaRIA, and 0.80 for bowel wall thickness.ConclusionIn early CD, MRE demonstrated moderate to substantial inter-observer agreement for ileocolonic evaluation. Limitations in colonic assessment likely reflect early disease detection rather than observer variability, highlighting the need for a complementary assessment.

磁共振肠造影检测疑似回结肠克罗恩病的观察者间变异性。
背景磁共振肠造影(MRE)可以显示克罗恩病(CD)及其并发症。材料和方法本事后分析包括48例疑似CD患者的MRE扫描,这些患者来自一项前瞻性、多中心盲法研究。基于主要研究中的回肠结肠镜检查,39例(81%)患者诊断出CD, 36例(69%)患者累及结肠。两名高级放射科医生和两名接受专业培训的初级医生,对临床数据不知情,评估图像质量、CD存在和疾病严重程度。结果不同部位的观察者间CD检测一致性不同:回肠末端(κ = 0.77, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.63-0.89)、结肠(κ = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.42-0.74)和回肠(κ = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.49-0.80)。高级放射科医生的一致性高于初级放射科医生:回肠终末(κ = 0.83 vs. 0.73; P = 0.60)和结肠(κ = 0.73 vs. 0.41; P = 0.11),尽管差异无统计学意义。疾病严重程度的观察者间一致性差至中等,MaRIA的类内相关系数(ICCs)为0.51 (95% CI = 0.35-0.67),简化MaRIA的类内相关系数(ICCs)为0.46 (95% CI = 0.29-0.62)。资深放射科医生表现出更高的一致性,有中等到良好的一致性:MaRIA的ICC为0.69,简化MaRIA为0.70,肠壁厚度为0.80。结论在早期CD中,MRE在回肠结肠评估中表现出中度至实质性的观察者间一致性。结肠评估的局限性可能反映了疾病的早期发现,而不是观察者的可变性,这突出了补充评估的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书