Why might members of racially minoritized groups seek anonymity when interacting with White people online? Codeswitching, emotional labour and burnout

IF 3.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Lewis Nitschinsk, Melinda Hewett, Audree Grand'Pierre, Michael Thai, Fiona Kate Barlow
{"title":"Why might members of racially minoritized groups seek anonymity when interacting with White people online? Codeswitching, emotional labour and burnout","authors":"Lewis Nitschinsk,&nbsp;Melinda Hewett,&nbsp;Audree Grand'Pierre,&nbsp;Michael Thai,&nbsp;Fiona Kate Barlow","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>People can alter the nature of online intergroup interactions by becoming anonymous. Across three studies (<i>N</i> = 1107), we surveyed Black (Studies 1–3) and White (Study 2) participants in majority-White nations. We argue that Black people living in these countries face substantial pressures in interracial interactions, and that responses associated with the performative pressures of contact might predict a desire for anonymity in interracial settings online. We operationalized these responses in three distinct yet related ways: codeswitching (adjusting language or behaviour), emotional labour (suppressing negative and displaying positive emotions) and experiencing burnout from intergroup contact. As proposed: (1) Black participants who engaged in more codeswitching and emotional labour, and who felt more burned out when interacting with White people, were more likely to seek anonymity in an interracial interaction; (2) Black participants were more likely than White participants to engage in codeswitching and emotional labour, to feel burned out from interracial contact, and, in turn, to seek anonymity in interracial interactions; and (3) stigma consciousness and perceived discrimination partly explained the relationship between codeswitching, emotional labour, and burnout and seeking anonymity. Our findings elucidate how group processes might affect whether members of racially minoritised groups might seek anonymity online.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"65 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.70060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjso.70060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People can alter the nature of online intergroup interactions by becoming anonymous. Across three studies (N = 1107), we surveyed Black (Studies 1–3) and White (Study 2) participants in majority-White nations. We argue that Black people living in these countries face substantial pressures in interracial interactions, and that responses associated with the performative pressures of contact might predict a desire for anonymity in interracial settings online. We operationalized these responses in three distinct yet related ways: codeswitching (adjusting language or behaviour), emotional labour (suppressing negative and displaying positive emotions) and experiencing burnout from intergroup contact. As proposed: (1) Black participants who engaged in more codeswitching and emotional labour, and who felt more burned out when interacting with White people, were more likely to seek anonymity in an interracial interaction; (2) Black participants were more likely than White participants to engage in codeswitching and emotional labour, to feel burned out from interracial contact, and, in turn, to seek anonymity in interracial interactions; and (3) stigma consciousness and perceived discrimination partly explained the relationship between codeswitching, emotional labour, and burnout and seeking anonymity. Our findings elucidate how group processes might affect whether members of racially minoritised groups might seek anonymity online.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

为什么少数种族群体的成员在网上与白人互动时会寻求匿名?代码转换、情绪劳动和倦怠。
人们可以通过匿名来改变在线群组间互动的本质。在三项研究(N = 1107)中,我们调查了白人占多数的国家的黑人(研究1-3)和白人(研究2)参与者。我们认为,生活在这些国家的黑人在跨种族互动中面临着巨大的压力,而与接触的表演性压力相关的反应可能预示着他们在跨种族网络环境中对匿名的渴望。我们将这些反应以三种不同但相关的方式进行操作:代码转换(调整语言或行为)、情绪劳动(抑制消极情绪和表现积极情绪)以及群体间接触造成的倦怠。结果表明:(1)参与更多代码转换和情绪劳动的黑人参与者,以及在与白人互动时感到更疲惫的黑人参与者,更有可能在种族间互动中寻求匿名;(2)黑人参与者比白人参与者更有可能进行代码转换和情绪劳动,在跨种族接触中感到倦怠,并在跨种族互动中寻求匿名;(3)污名意识和感知歧视在一定程度上解释了编码转换、情绪劳动、倦怠和匿名寻求之间的关系。我们的研究结果阐明了群体过程如何影响少数种族群体的成员是否会在网上寻求匿名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Social Psychology publishes work from scholars based in all parts of the world, and manuscripts that present data on a wide range of populations inside and outside the UK. It publishes original papers in all areas of social psychology including: • social cognition • attitudes • group processes • social influence • intergroup relations • self and identity • nonverbal communication • social psychological aspects of personality, affect and emotion • language and discourse Submissions addressing these topics from a variety of approaches and methods, both quantitative and qualitative are welcomed. We publish papers of the following kinds: • empirical papers that address theoretical issues; • theoretical papers, including analyses of existing social psychological theories and presentations of theoretical innovations, extensions, or integrations; • review papers that provide an evaluation of work within a given area of social psychology and that present proposals for further research in that area; • methodological papers concerning issues that are particularly relevant to a wide range of social psychologists; • an invited agenda article as the first article in the first part of every volume. The editorial team aims to handle papers as efficiently as possible. In 2016, papers were triaged within less than a week, and the average turnaround time from receipt of the manuscript to first decision sent back to the authors was 47 days.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书