Phenotyping and symptom diagnostic accuracy in unproven gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): An experience from Saudi GI Motility Labs.

IF 2
Mohammed A Alzahrani, Ibrahim M Almanjahi, Abdullah A Alquzi, Abdulaziz H Alamri, Abdullah M Shahrani, Mohammed S Mukharrib, Saad A AlQahtani, Eman A Almahjani, Aishah M Alahmari, Sarah H Asiri, Mohra S Alqahtani, Alanoud I Asiri, Bushra Y Alsharif, Bader S Alahmari, Osamah H Abu Hawi, Mushabbab S Hammad, Khalid Y Nabrawi, Ali M Alamari, Abdullah A Al-Shahrani, Abdullah M Alshehri, Abdullah M Algarni
{"title":"Phenotyping and symptom diagnostic accuracy in unproven gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): An experience from Saudi GI Motility Labs.","authors":"Mohammed A Alzahrani, Ibrahim M Almanjahi, Abdullah A Alquzi, Abdulaziz H Alamri, Abdullah M Shahrani, Mohammed S Mukharrib, Saad A AlQahtani, Eman A Almahjani, Aishah M Alahmari, Sarah H Asiri, Mohra S Alqahtani, Alanoud I Asiri, Bushra Y Alsharif, Bader S Alahmari, Osamah H Abu Hawi, Mushabbab S Hammad, Khalid Y Nabrawi, Ali M Alamari, Abdullah A Al-Shahrani, Abdullah M Alshehri, Abdullah M Algarni","doi":"10.4103/sjg.sjg_43_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The recent Saudi Gastroenterology Association (SGA) clinical care pathway for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) recommends objective physiologic testing in patients with persistent reflux symptoms and normal endoscopy. This study aimed to phenotype patients with unproven GERD using 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring and high-resolution manometry (HRM), and to evaluate the diagnostic utility of reflux symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients with reflux-like symptoms and either normal endoscopy or Los Angeles grade A esophagitis underwent off-proton pump inhibitor MII-pH monitoring and HRM, between July 2020 and September 2025. GERD phenotypes were classified as non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), reflux hypersensitivity (RH), or functional heartburn (FH) according to the Lyon Consensus v2.0 and SGA clinical care pathway guidelines. Manometric findings were interpreted using the Chicago Classification criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of typical and extra-esophageal symptoms for identifying NERD were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 117 patients were included (median age 39 years; 53.85% male). Phenotyping identified 27.35% as NERD, 47.86% as RH, and 24.79% as FH. Symptom profiles overlapped across groups. Median acid exposure time and mean nocturnal baseline impedance showed expected physiologic gradients, with the highest acid burden and lowest impedance in NERD. Abnormal esophageal motility was present in 34.2%, most commonly ineffective esophageal motility. Heartburn and regurgitation were highly sensitive (93.75% and 90.62%, respectively), but poorly specific (8.24% and 15.29%, respectively) for NERD, whereas cough and laryngitis were highly specific (88.24% and 84.71%, respectively), but minimally sensitive (6.25% and 9.38%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RH and FH predominate in patients with unproven GERD. Symptom assessment alone is insufficient for accurate diagnosis, although typical symptoms retain screening value due to their high sensitivity. These findings highlight the need for integrated physiologic testing to guide precise phenotyping and individualized management.</p>","PeriodicalId":520774,"journal":{"name":"Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_43_26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The recent Saudi Gastroenterology Association (SGA) clinical care pathway for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) recommends objective physiologic testing in patients with persistent reflux symptoms and normal endoscopy. This study aimed to phenotype patients with unproven GERD using 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring and high-resolution manometry (HRM), and to evaluate the diagnostic utility of reflux symptoms.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients with reflux-like symptoms and either normal endoscopy or Los Angeles grade A esophagitis underwent off-proton pump inhibitor MII-pH monitoring and HRM, between July 2020 and September 2025. GERD phenotypes were classified as non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), reflux hypersensitivity (RH), or functional heartburn (FH) according to the Lyon Consensus v2.0 and SGA clinical care pathway guidelines. Manometric findings were interpreted using the Chicago Classification criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of typical and extra-esophageal symptoms for identifying NERD were assessed.

Results: A total of 117 patients were included (median age 39 years; 53.85% male). Phenotyping identified 27.35% as NERD, 47.86% as RH, and 24.79% as FH. Symptom profiles overlapped across groups. Median acid exposure time and mean nocturnal baseline impedance showed expected physiologic gradients, with the highest acid burden and lowest impedance in NERD. Abnormal esophageal motility was present in 34.2%, most commonly ineffective esophageal motility. Heartburn and regurgitation were highly sensitive (93.75% and 90.62%, respectively), but poorly specific (8.24% and 15.29%, respectively) for NERD, whereas cough and laryngitis were highly specific (88.24% and 84.71%, respectively), but minimally sensitive (6.25% and 9.38%, respectively).

Conclusion: RH and FH predominate in patients with unproven GERD. Symptom assessment alone is insufficient for accurate diagnosis, although typical symptoms retain screening value due to their high sensitivity. These findings highlight the need for integrated physiologic testing to guide precise phenotyping and individualized management.

未经证实的胃食管反流病(GERD)的表型和症状诊断准确性:来自沙特胃肠运动实验室的经验。
背景:最近沙特胃肠病学协会(SGA)对胃食管反流病(GERD)的临床护理路径建议对持续反流症状和内镜检查正常的患者进行客观生理检查。本研究旨在通过24小时多通道腔内阻抗- ph (MII-pH)监测和高分辨率压力测定(HRM)对未经证实的胃食管反流患者进行表型分析,并评估反流症状的诊断价值。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,在2020年7月至2025年9月期间,有反流样症状和正常内窥镜检查或洛杉矶A级食管炎的成年患者接受了非质子泵抑制剂MII-pH监测和HRM。根据里昂共识v2.0和SGA临床护理路径指南,GERD表型分为非糜烂性反流病(NERD)、反流超敏反应(RH)或功能性胃灼热(FH)。压力测量结果使用芝加哥分类标准进行解释。评估典型和食管外症状对诊断NERD的敏感性和特异性。结果:共纳入117例患者,中位年龄39岁,男性53.85%。表型鉴定为27.35%为NERD, 47.86%为RH, 24.79%为FH。症状概要在不同组之间重叠。中位酸暴露时间和平均夜间基线阻抗显示出预期的生理梯度,NERD患者的酸负荷最高,阻抗最低。34.2%的患者存在食管运动异常,最常见的是食管运动无效。胃灼热和反流对NERD高度敏感(分别为93.75%和90.62%),但特异性较差(分别为8.24%和15.29%);咳嗽和喉炎对NERD高度敏感(分别为88.24%和84.71%),但敏感性较低(分别为6.25%和9.38%)。结论:RH和FH在未证实的GERD患者中占主导地位。单纯的症状评估不足以准确诊断,但典型症状因其高敏感性而保留筛查价值。这些发现强调需要综合的生理测试来指导精确的表型和个性化的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书