Strengthening and sustaining gender-based violence (GBV) coordination in emergencies: a synthesis of practitioner-driven, globally applicable recommendations.

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Philomena Raftery, Alina Potts, Melanie Hyde, Yermeyn York Wuyke, Hira Hashmey, Liliane Munezero, Ligia Kiss, Mazeda Hossain, Jennifer Palmer
{"title":"Strengthening and sustaining gender-based violence (GBV) coordination in emergencies: a synthesis of practitioner-driven, globally applicable recommendations.","authors":"Philomena Raftery, Alina Potts, Melanie Hyde, Yermeyn York Wuyke, Hira Hashmey, Liliane Munezero, Ligia Kiss, Mazeda Hossain, Jennifer Palmer","doi":"10.1186/s13031-026-00770-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>INTRODUCTION: Gender-based violence (GBV) is a global public health and human rights crisis, requiring coordinated efforts to ensure effective prevention, risk mitigation, and response, particularly in emergencies. Despite policy commitments underlining the importance of addressing GBV in emergencies, funding remains insufficient, inconsistent, and poorly aligned with aid prioritisation in the changing humanitarian and global health financing landscape. This paper synthesizes evidence on GBV coordination in humanitarian and public health emergencies and presents global recommendations to inform policy and practice in the context of the ongoing Humanitarian Reset. METHODS: Using a three-phase qualitative methodology—comprising evidence synthesis, case study analysis, and a global expert practitioner consultation—we developed a framework and present strategic recommendations to strengthen and sustain GBV coordination in emergencies. RESULTS: Our findings identify seven strategic recommendations aimed at investing in, sustaining, and transforming GBV coordination efforts globally. Key investment priorities include expanding the GBV coordination workforce, including for risk mitigation, prioritizing and systematically addressing GBV within public health emergencies, and investing in information management systems and strategic research. To sustain GBV coordination, we recommend adapting funding models, diversifying financial sources, advancing national leadership and localization, and implementing context-specific coordination approaches, including at the sub-national level. Furthermore, we propose that emergencies can serve as catalysts for broader social and legal transformations that advance GBV prevention and gender equality. CONCLUSION: Rather than accepting the deprioritisation of GBV coordination as an inevitable consequence of funding reductions framed as efficiency gains, our findings underscore the critical value of maintaining a dedicated focus on GBV within humanitarian coordination. Our findings provide practical, evidence-based recommendations and a global framework for policymakers, donors, and practitioners to strengthen and sustain GBV coordination in diverse emergency contexts. Sustained progress will require collective commitment to address GBV, even as funding landscapes change, and the backlash against gender equality continues to intensify. </p>","PeriodicalId":54287,"journal":{"name":"Conflict and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13001181/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-026-00770-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Gender-based violence (GBV) is a global public health and human rights crisis, requiring coordinated efforts to ensure effective prevention, risk mitigation, and response, particularly in emergencies. Despite policy commitments underlining the importance of addressing GBV in emergencies, funding remains insufficient, inconsistent, and poorly aligned with aid prioritisation in the changing humanitarian and global health financing landscape. This paper synthesizes evidence on GBV coordination in humanitarian and public health emergencies and presents global recommendations to inform policy and practice in the context of the ongoing Humanitarian Reset. METHODS: Using a three-phase qualitative methodology—comprising evidence synthesis, case study analysis, and a global expert practitioner consultation—we developed a framework and present strategic recommendations to strengthen and sustain GBV coordination in emergencies. RESULTS: Our findings identify seven strategic recommendations aimed at investing in, sustaining, and transforming GBV coordination efforts globally. Key investment priorities include expanding the GBV coordination workforce, including for risk mitigation, prioritizing and systematically addressing GBV within public health emergencies, and investing in information management systems and strategic research. To sustain GBV coordination, we recommend adapting funding models, diversifying financial sources, advancing national leadership and localization, and implementing context-specific coordination approaches, including at the sub-national level. Furthermore, we propose that emergencies can serve as catalysts for broader social and legal transformations that advance GBV prevention and gender equality. CONCLUSION: Rather than accepting the deprioritisation of GBV coordination as an inevitable consequence of funding reductions framed as efficiency gains, our findings underscore the critical value of maintaining a dedicated focus on GBV within humanitarian coordination. Our findings provide practical, evidence-based recommendations and a global framework for policymakers, donors, and practitioners to strengthen and sustain GBV coordination in diverse emergency contexts. Sustained progress will require collective commitment to address GBV, even as funding landscapes change, and the backlash against gender equality continues to intensify.

Abstract Image

在紧急情况下加强和维持基于性别的暴力协调:综合从业人员驱动的、全球适用的建议。
导言:基于性别的暴力(GBV)是全球公共卫生和人权危机,需要协调努力,确保有效预防、减轻风险和应对,特别是在紧急情况下。尽管政策承诺强调在紧急情况下解决基于性别的暴力的重要性,但在不断变化的人道主义和全球卫生筹资格局中,资金仍然不足、不一致,而且与援助优先次序不协调。本文综合了关于人道主义和公共卫生紧急情况中性别暴力协调的证据,并提出了在正在进行的人道主义重置背景下为政策和实践提供信息的全球建议。方法:采用三阶段定性方法——包括证据综合、案例研究分析和全球专家从业者咨询——我们制定了一个框架,并提出了战略建议,以加强和维持紧急情况下的性别暴力协调。结果:我们的研究结果确定了七项战略建议,旨在投资、维持和改变全球性别暴力协调工作。主要投资重点包括扩大性别暴力协调工作队伍,包括减轻风险,在突发公共卫生事件中优先考虑和系统地解决性别暴力问题,以及投资于信息管理系统和战略研究。为维持性别暴力协调,我们建议调整供资模式,使资金来源多样化,加强国家领导和本地化,并实施具体情况的协调方法,包括在国家以下一级。此外,我们建议紧急情况可以成为推动更广泛的社会和法律变革的催化剂,从而促进性别暴力的预防和性别平等。结论:我们的研究结果强调了在人道主义协调中保持对性别暴力的专注的关键价值,而不是接受将减少资金作为提高效率的不可避免的结果而降低性别暴力协调的优先级。我们的研究结果为政策制定者、捐助者和从业人员在各种紧急情况下加强和维持性别暴力协调提供了实用的、基于证据的建议和全球框架。要取得持续进展,就需要集体承诺解决基于性别的暴力问题,即使资金格局发生变化,反对性别平等的反弹继续加剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conflict and Health
Conflict and Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
57
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Conflict and Health is a highly-accessed, open access journal providing a global platform to disseminate insightful and impactful studies documenting the public health impacts and responses related to armed conflict, humanitarian crises, and forced migration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书