Modified socket shield technique versus unassisted socket healing: A randomized controlled clinical trial using CBCT-based dimensional analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
L-M Sáez-Alcaide, C Cobo-Vázquez, J Cortés-Bretón-Brinkmann, L Sánchez-Labrador, R-M López-Pintor, J López-Quiles, J-T García-Denche
{"title":"Modified socket shield technique versus unassisted socket healing: A randomized controlled clinical trial using CBCT-based dimensional analysis.","authors":"L-M Sáez-Alcaide, C Cobo-Vázquez, J Cortés-Bretón-Brinkmann, L Sánchez-Labrador, R-M López-Pintor, J López-Quiles, J-T García-Denche","doi":"10.4317/medoral.27936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tooth loss leads to alveolar bone resorption due to deficiency of blood supply and socket shield technique was introduced to prevent this bone loss. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of the modified socket shield technique (mSST) without immediate implant placement (test group) compared with unassisted socket healing (USH) (control group) on vertical and horizontal bone dimensional changes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients requiring dental extraction at a non-molar site were recruited and randomly allocated to the test or control group. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans obtained before and 4 months after surgery were superimposed to assess horizontal ridge width and vertical bone height changes. Group comparisons were performed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences between the groups were found for buccal height (BH) reduction (p<0.001), buccal bone width (BW) reduction at 1mm, 3mm and 5mm (p<0.001), and overall bone resorption (p<0.001). The test group showed reduced dimensional changes, with mean differences of 1.527mm in BH, 0.982mm in BW1, 0.783mm in BW3, 0.545mm in BW5, and 26.2mm³ in volume resorption (p<0.001). No significant differences were observed in vertical or horizontal bone resorption on the lingual side. Regarding the influence of buccal bone thickness (BBT) on buccal socket dimensional changes, significant differences between groups were detected. A critical threshold of 1.5mm BBT was identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified socket shield technique without immediate implant placement appears to be a protective factor against post-extraction bone remodeling, particularly in sites with buccal bone thickness less than 1.5mm.</p>","PeriodicalId":49016,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13312319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.27936","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tooth loss leads to alveolar bone resorption due to deficiency of blood supply and socket shield technique was introduced to prevent this bone loss. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of the modified socket shield technique (mSST) without immediate implant placement (test group) compared with unassisted socket healing (USH) (control group) on vertical and horizontal bone dimensional changes.

Material and methods: Patients requiring dental extraction at a non-molar site were recruited and randomly allocated to the test or control group. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans obtained before and 4 months after surgery were superimposed to assess horizontal ridge width and vertical bone height changes. Group comparisons were performed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).

Results: Significant differences between the groups were found for buccal height (BH) reduction (p<0.001), buccal bone width (BW) reduction at 1mm, 3mm and 5mm (p<0.001), and overall bone resorption (p<0.001). The test group showed reduced dimensional changes, with mean differences of 1.527mm in BH, 0.982mm in BW1, 0.783mm in BW3, 0.545mm in BW5, and 26.2mm³ in volume resorption (p<0.001). No significant differences were observed in vertical or horizontal bone resorption on the lingual side. Regarding the influence of buccal bone thickness (BBT) on buccal socket dimensional changes, significant differences between groups were detected. A critical threshold of 1.5mm BBT was identified.

Conclusions: The modified socket shield technique without immediate implant placement appears to be a protective factor against post-extraction bone remodeling, particularly in sites with buccal bone thickness less than 1.5mm.

改良眼窝屏蔽技术与无辅助眼窝愈合:一项基于cbct的随机对照临床试验。
背景:牙槽骨因缺血导致牙槽骨吸收,为了防止牙槽骨的流失,提出了牙槽骨屏蔽技术。因此,本研究旨在评价无即刻种植体置入的改良窝盾技术(mSST)(试验组)与无辅助窝骨愈合(USH)(对照组)对垂直和水平骨尺寸变化的影响。材料和方法:招募需要在非磨牙部位拔牙的患者并随机分配到实验组或对照组。将术前和术后4个月的锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)进行叠加,评估水平脊宽和垂直骨高的变化。采用协方差分析(ANCOVA)进行组间比较。结果:两组间的颊高度(BH)降低有显著差异(p)结论:改良的不立即植入种植体的窝护技术似乎是防止拔牙后骨重塑的保护因素,特别是在颊骨厚度小于1.5mm的部位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal
Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: 1. Oral Medicine and Pathology: Clinicopathological as well as medical or surgical management aspects of diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands, maxillary bones, as well as orofacial neurological disorders, and systemic conditions with an impact on the oral cavity. 2. Oral Surgery: Surgical management aspects of diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands, maxillary bones, teeth, implants, oral surgical procedures. Surgical management of diseases affecting head and neck areas. 3. Medically compromised patients in Dentistry: Articles discussing medical problems in Odontology will also be included, with a special focus on the clinico-odontological management of medically compromised patients, and considerations regarding high-risk or disabled patients. 4. Implantology 5. Periodontology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书