Psychometric evaluation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0 in adults with chronic pain.

IF 1.6 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2026-03-09 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2025-0037
Fillip Ferreira Eikeseth, Geir Pedersen, Audun Stubhaug, Stefan Sütterlin, Gunnvald Kvarstein
{"title":"Psychometric evaluation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0 in adults with chronic pain.","authors":"Fillip Ferreira Eikeseth, Geir Pedersen, Audun Stubhaug, Stefan Sütterlin, Gunnvald Kvarstein","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2025-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Chronic pain and personality disorders frequently co-occur. This co-occurrence may pose challenges in pain management and should be addressed by clinicians to optimize outcomes. The Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF) is a time-efficient screening tool for impairments in personality functioning based on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study evaluates the psychometric properties of the LPFS-BF in a sample of adults with chronic pain. Data was retrieved from the Oslo University Hospital Pain Registry and includes 892 participants referred to outpatient pain management. The psychometric properties of the LPFS-BF were investigated in terms of factor structure, scale reliability, and concurrent validity with anxiety and depression, health-related quality of life, and past week usual pain intensity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 49 years and 64 % were female. A bifactor structure showed best model fit: Comparative fit index=0.995, Tucker-Lewis index=0.993, root mean square error of approximation=0.023, standardized root mean square residual=0.030. Scale reliability was good for the general factor (ω <sub><i>t</i></sub> =0.89, ω <sub><i>h</i></sub> =0.79), poor for the self domain (ω <sub><i>t</i></sub> =0.25, ω <sub><i>h</i></sub> =0.05), and questionable for the interpersonal domain (ω <sub><i>t</i></sub> =0.68, ω <sub><i>h</i></sub> =0.40). Explained common variance for the general factor was 68 % which supported essential unidimensionality. The magnitudes of the associations between the LPFS-BF and the investigated variables were comparable to previous research, thus supporting its concurrent validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that the LPFS-BF is best viewed as a unidimensional scale in the current sample and support the LPFS-BF as a valid and reliable screening tool for impairments in personality functioning among individuals with chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2025-0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Chronic pain and personality disorders frequently co-occur. This co-occurrence may pose challenges in pain management and should be addressed by clinicians to optimize outcomes. The Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF) is a time-efficient screening tool for impairments in personality functioning based on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.

Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluates the psychometric properties of the LPFS-BF in a sample of adults with chronic pain. Data was retrieved from the Oslo University Hospital Pain Registry and includes 892 participants referred to outpatient pain management. The psychometric properties of the LPFS-BF were investigated in terms of factor structure, scale reliability, and concurrent validity with anxiety and depression, health-related quality of life, and past week usual pain intensity.

Results: Mean age was 49 years and 64 % were female. A bifactor structure showed best model fit: Comparative fit index=0.995, Tucker-Lewis index=0.993, root mean square error of approximation=0.023, standardized root mean square residual=0.030. Scale reliability was good for the general factor (ω t =0.89, ω h =0.79), poor for the self domain (ω t =0.25, ω h =0.05), and questionable for the interpersonal domain (ω t =0.68, ω h =0.40). Explained common variance for the general factor was 68 % which supported essential unidimensionality. The magnitudes of the associations between the LPFS-BF and the investigated variables were comparable to previous research, thus supporting its concurrent validity.

Conclusions: The results suggest that the LPFS-BF is best viewed as a unidimensional scale in the current sample and support the LPFS-BF as a valid and reliable screening tool for impairments in personality functioning among individuals with chronic pain.

成人慢性疼痛患者人格功能水平量表简表2.0的心理测量评估。
目的:慢性疼痛和人格障碍经常同时发生。这种共存可能对疼痛管理构成挑战,临床医生应该解决这一问题,以优化结果。人格功能水平量表-简表2.0 (LPFS-BF)是一种基于DSM-5人格障碍备选模型的人格功能障碍筛查工具。方法:本横断面研究评估了LPFS-BF在慢性疼痛成人样本中的心理测量特性。数据从奥斯陆大学医院疼痛登记处检索,包括892名门诊疼痛管理的参与者。从因素结构、量表信度、焦虑抑郁、健康相关生活质量、过去一周通常疼痛强度的并发效度等方面考察了LPFS-BF的心理测量特性。结果:患者平均年龄49岁,女性占64 %。双因子结构模型拟合最佳:比较拟合指数=0.995,Tucker-Lewis指数=0.993,近似均方根误差=0.023,标准化均方根残差=0.030。一般因素的量表信度较好(ω t =0.89, ω h =0.79),自我领域的量表信度较差(ω t =0.25, ω h =0.05),人际领域的量表信度值得怀疑(ω t =0.68, ω h =0.40)。一般因子的解释共同方差为68% %,支持基本单维性。LPFS-BF与被调查变量之间的关联程度与以往的研究相当,从而支持其并发效度。结论:在目前的样本中,LPFS-BF最适合作为一种单维量表,并支持LPFS-BF作为一种有效可靠的慢性疼痛患者人格功能障碍筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书