Mediating effect of catastrophising in correlation between pain and disability amongst patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.

IF 1.6 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2026-03-09 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2025-0055
Veikko Sainio, Mikhail Saltychev, Annika Miikkulainen, Hanna-Stiina Taskinen
{"title":"Mediating effect of catastrophising in correlation between pain and disability amongst patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.","authors":"Veikko Sainio, Mikhail Saltychev, Annika Miikkulainen, Hanna-Stiina Taskinen","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2025-0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the mediating role of catastrophizing in the relationship between pain and disability among patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional register of 141 patients with CTS. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) was used. Mediation analysis was used to assess the indirect effect of pain catastrophizing on pain-related disability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age was 54.0 (SD 16.1) years and 89 (63 %) were women. For the total PCS score, the indirect effect was responsible for 31 % (95 % CI 15 %-47 %) to 33 % (95 % CI 15 %-52 %). The highest proportion was observed in the helplessness domain, 37 % (95 % CI 19 %-55 %). The lowest effect of 11 % (95 % CI 0 %-23 %) was seen for the magnification domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mediating effect of catastrophizing was responsible for over 30 % of the total effect seen in correlation between pain and disability experienced by patients with CTS. While the effect of magnification sub-score was borderline and could probably be ignored in clinical context, domain of helplessness reached the effect size of almost 40 %. The results suggest that catastrophizing should be considered when treating or rehabilitating people with CTS. Catastrophizing may play a significant role in the development of pain-related disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2025-0055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the mediating role of catastrophizing in the relationship between pain and disability among patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Methods: Cross-sectional register of 141 patients with CTS. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) was used. Mediation analysis was used to assess the indirect effect of pain catastrophizing on pain-related disability.

Results: The average age was 54.0 (SD 16.1) years and 89 (63 %) were women. For the total PCS score, the indirect effect was responsible for 31 % (95 % CI 15 %-47 %) to 33 % (95 % CI 15 %-52 %). The highest proportion was observed in the helplessness domain, 37 % (95 % CI 19 %-55 %). The lowest effect of 11 % (95 % CI 0 %-23 %) was seen for the magnification domain.

Conclusions: The mediating effect of catastrophizing was responsible for over 30 % of the total effect seen in correlation between pain and disability experienced by patients with CTS. While the effect of magnification sub-score was borderline and could probably be ignored in clinical context, domain of helplessness reached the effect size of almost 40 %. The results suggest that catastrophizing should be considered when treating or rehabilitating people with CTS. Catastrophizing may play a significant role in the development of pain-related disability.

腕管综合征患者疼痛与残疾相关性的突变化中介作用。
目的:探讨灾难化在腕管综合征(CTS)患者疼痛与残疾关系中的中介作用。方法:对141例CTS患者进行横断面登记。采用疼痛灾变量表(PCS)。采用中介分析评估疼痛灾难化对疼痛相关失能的间接影响。结果:平均年龄54.0岁(SD 16.1),女性89例(63 %)。对于总PCS得分,间接效应负责31 %(95 % CI 15 %-47 %)至33 %(95 % CI 15 %-52 %)。在无助领域观察到的比例最高,为37 %(95 % CI 19 %-55 %)。放大区域的最低效应为11 %(95 % CI 0 %-23 %)。结论:灾难化的中介作用占CTS患者疼痛与失能相关总效应的30% %以上。放大分的影响是边缘性的,在临床情境中可能被忽略,而无助感领域的影响几乎达到了40% %。结果表明,在治疗或康复CTS患者时应考虑灾难化。灾难化可能在疼痛相关残疾的发展中起着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书