{"title":"Structural learning is enhanced by increasing blocked repetition of visuomotor perturbations","authors":"Alexander T. Brunfeldt , Florian A. Kagerer","doi":"10.1016/j.humov.2026.103472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Structural learning refers to the ability to extract and generalize the underlying structure of a set of perturbations—even when the specific perturbations vary from trial to trial. In visuomotor tasks, exposure to such variable but related perturbations has been shown to speed subsequent adaptation to a new, fixed perturbation. However, many center-out reaching studies present several repetitions of each perturbation—often cycling through a set of eight targets—before switching to the next one. This raises the question of whether these repeated exposures reduce the true variability that is thought to drive structural learning. To examine how the number of consecutive repetitions influences learning, we used a center-out reaching task with two targets and trained three groups with either two, four, or eight repetitions of a particular visual feedback rotation between ±90 degrees before presenting a new, pseudorandom rotation; a control group trained in a null field. We show that the different training regimes all facilitated adaptation in the subsequent fixed rotation testing compared to the control group, but a clear dose response was limited to the eight-repetition group who benefitted most, both in feedforward and feedback control of their performance. As shown in previous research, the facilitation was present only during the early testing phase. An exploratory retention test in a subgroup showed no effects after 24 h. We discuss these findings also in the context of earlier massed- vs distributed-practice approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55046,"journal":{"name":"Human Movement Science","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 103472"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Movement Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167945726000230","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Structural learning refers to the ability to extract and generalize the underlying structure of a set of perturbations—even when the specific perturbations vary from trial to trial. In visuomotor tasks, exposure to such variable but related perturbations has been shown to speed subsequent adaptation to a new, fixed perturbation. However, many center-out reaching studies present several repetitions of each perturbation—often cycling through a set of eight targets—before switching to the next one. This raises the question of whether these repeated exposures reduce the true variability that is thought to drive structural learning. To examine how the number of consecutive repetitions influences learning, we used a center-out reaching task with two targets and trained three groups with either two, four, or eight repetitions of a particular visual feedback rotation between ±90 degrees before presenting a new, pseudorandom rotation; a control group trained in a null field. We show that the different training regimes all facilitated adaptation in the subsequent fixed rotation testing compared to the control group, but a clear dose response was limited to the eight-repetition group who benefitted most, both in feedforward and feedback control of their performance. As shown in previous research, the facilitation was present only during the early testing phase. An exploratory retention test in a subgroup showed no effects after 24 h. We discuss these findings also in the context of earlier massed- vs distributed-practice approaches.
期刊介绍:
Human Movement Science provides a medium for publishing disciplinary and multidisciplinary studies on human movement. It brings together psychological, biomechanical and neurophysiological research on the control, organization and learning of human movement, including the perceptual support of movement. The overarching goal of the journal is to publish articles that help advance theoretical understanding of the control and organization of human movement, as well as changes therein as a function of development, learning and rehabilitation. The nature of the research reported may vary from fundamental theoretical or empirical studies to more applied studies in the fields of, for example, sport, dance and rehabilitation with the proviso that all studies have a distinct theoretical bearing. Also, reviews and meta-studies advancing the understanding of human movement are welcome.
These aims and scope imply that purely descriptive studies are not acceptable, while methodological articles are only acceptable if the methodology in question opens up new vistas in understanding the control and organization of human movement. The same holds for articles on exercise physiology, which in general are not supported, unless they speak to the control and organization of human movement. In general, it is required that the theoretical message of articles published in Human Movement Science is, to a certain extent, innovative and not dismissible as just "more of the same."