Sensitivity of Literature T 1 $$ {T}_1 $$ Mapping Methods to the Underlying Magnetization Transfer Parameters.

Abstract

Magnetization transfer (MT) has been identified as the principal source of $T_1$ variability in the MRI literature. This study assesses the sensitivity of established $T_1$ mapping techniques to variations in the underlying MT parameters. For each $T_1$ -mapping method, the observed $T_1$ was simulated as a function of the underlying MT parameters $p_i^{\text{MT}}$ , corresponding to different brain regions of interest (ROIs) at 3T. As measures of sensitivity, the derivatives $\partial T_1^{\text{observed}}/\partial p_i^{\text{MT}}$ were computed and analyzed with a linear mixed-effects model as a function of $p_i^{\text{MT}}$ , ROI, pulse sequence type (e.g., inversion-recovery and variable-flip angle), and the individual sequences. The analyzed $T_1$ -mapping sequences have a considerable sensitivity to changes in the semisolid spin pool size $m_0^{\text{s}},T_1^{\text{f}}$ of the free, $T_1^{\text{s}}$ of the semisolid spin pool, and the (inverse) exchange rate $T_{\text{x}}$ . All derivatives vary considerably with the underlying MT parameters and between pulse sequences. In general, the derivatives cannot be determined by the sequence type but rather depend on the implementation details of the sequence. One notable exception is that variable-flip-angle methods are, in general, more sensitive to the exchange rate than inversion-recovery methods. Variations in the observed $T_1$ can be caused by several underlying MT parameters, and the sensitivity to each parameter depends on both the underlying MT parameters and the sequence.