Comparative evaluation of conventional and nanopore approaches in onychomycosis diagnosis

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Janeth Villanueva-Reyes , Andrés Mauricio González-Ríos , Maria del Pilar Crespo-Ortiz , María Inés Álvarez-Valle
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of conventional and nanopore approaches in onychomycosis diagnosis","authors":"Janeth Villanueva-Reyes ,&nbsp;Andrés Mauricio González-Ríos ,&nbsp;Maria del Pilar Crespo-Ortiz ,&nbsp;María Inés Álvarez-Valle","doi":"10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2026.117348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Onychomycosis is a frequent and chronic nail infection caused by dermatophytes, yeast, and non-dermatophyte molds (NDM). Detection of the causative agent is relevant to overcoming recurrent infections and improving treatment. Combined microscopy and culture are the diagnostic gold standard; however, more sensitive tests are needed to speed detection. This work aimed to assess fungal nail diagnosis using conventional and molecular techniques. We explored the potential of nanopore sequencing for fungal detection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 104 nail samples from 51 patients with onychomycosis and 53 individuals with healthy nails were subjected to potassium hydroxide(KOH) microscopy, culture, PCR, and nanopore sequencing. Sensitivity was calculated using a composite reference standard based on microscopy and culture.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Distal subungual onychomycosis was the most frequent clinical presentation (43.1%). Infections were primarily caused by dermatophytes 60% (21), followed by yeast 22.9% (8) and NDM 11.4% (4), 5.7% (2) were mixed infections. The prevalent pathogens were <em>T. rubrum</em> (40%), <em>T. mentagrophytes</em> (14.3%), and <em>C. albicans</em> (14.3%). 90.2% (46/51) of patients were positive by KOH, 68.6% (35/51) by culture (58.8%, 30/51 positive in both), and 58.8%(30/51) were sequenced by nanopore. Fungal DNA sequences were identified in 65.7% (23/35) of culture-positive patients. Eight samples from healthy nails were positive for fungal DNA and were considered transient microbiota.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dermatophytes are the predominant causative agent; however, at least 30% of nail infections are caused by yeast and NDM. Conventional diagnosis remains challenging; alternatively, nanopore sequencing represents a complementary diagnostic tool that should be further optimized for clinical application.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11329,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","volume":"115 3","pages":"Article 117348"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732889326000982","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Onychomycosis is a frequent and chronic nail infection caused by dermatophytes, yeast, and non-dermatophyte molds (NDM). Detection of the causative agent is relevant to overcoming recurrent infections and improving treatment. Combined microscopy and culture are the diagnostic gold standard; however, more sensitive tests are needed to speed detection. This work aimed to assess fungal nail diagnosis using conventional and molecular techniques. We explored the potential of nanopore sequencing for fungal detection.

Methods

A total of 104 nail samples from 51 patients with onychomycosis and 53 individuals with healthy nails were subjected to potassium hydroxide(KOH) microscopy, culture, PCR, and nanopore sequencing. Sensitivity was calculated using a composite reference standard based on microscopy and culture.

Results

Distal subungual onychomycosis was the most frequent clinical presentation (43.1%). Infections were primarily caused by dermatophytes 60% (21), followed by yeast 22.9% (8) and NDM 11.4% (4), 5.7% (2) were mixed infections. The prevalent pathogens were T. rubrum (40%), T. mentagrophytes (14.3%), and C. albicans (14.3%). 90.2% (46/51) of patients were positive by KOH, 68.6% (35/51) by culture (58.8%, 30/51 positive in both), and 58.8%(30/51) were sequenced by nanopore. Fungal DNA sequences were identified in 65.7% (23/35) of culture-positive patients. Eight samples from healthy nails were positive for fungal DNA and were considered transient microbiota.

Conclusion

Dermatophytes are the predominant causative agent; however, at least 30% of nail infections are caused by yeast and NDM. Conventional diagnosis remains challenging; alternatively, nanopore sequencing represents a complementary diagnostic tool that should be further optimized for clinical application.
传统方法与纳米孔方法诊断甲真菌病的比较评价。
背景:甲真菌病是由皮肤真菌、酵母菌和非皮肤真菌(NDM)引起的一种常见的慢性指甲感染。病原的检测对克服复发性感染和改善治疗具有重要意义。联合显微镜和培养是诊断的金标准;然而,需要更灵敏的检测来加快检测速度。这项工作旨在评估真菌指甲诊断使用传统和分子技术。我们探索了纳米孔测序在真菌检测中的潜力。方法:对51例甲癣患者和53例健康人的104个指甲标本进行氢氧化钾显微镜、培养、PCR和纳米孔测序。使用基于显微镜和培养的复合参考标准来计算灵敏度。结果:远端甲下真菌病是最常见的临床表现(43.1%)。感染以皮癣菌为主,占60%(21例),其次为酵母菌22.9%(8例),NDM 11.4%(4例),混合感染5.7%(2例)。流行的病原菌为红螺旋体(40%)、红植螺旋体(14.3%)和白色念珠菌(14.3%)。90.2%(46/51)的患者KOH阳性,68.6%(35/51)的患者培养(58.8%,30/51均阳性),58.8%(30/51)的患者纳米孔测序。65.7%(23/35)培养阳性患者检出真菌DNA序列。来自健康指甲的8个样本的真菌DNA呈阳性,被认为是短暂的微生物群。结论:皮肤真菌是主要病原;然而,至少30%的指甲感染是由酵母菌和NDM引起的。常规诊断仍然具有挑战性;另外,纳米孔测序代表了一种补充诊断工具,应该进一步优化临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease keeps you informed of the latest developments in clinical microbiology and the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Packed with rigorously peer-reviewed articles and studies in bacteriology, immunology, immunoserology, infectious diseases, mycology, parasitology, and virology, the journal examines new procedures, unusual cases, controversial issues, and important new literature. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease distinguished independent editorial board, consisting of experts from many medical specialties, ensures you extensive and authoritative coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书