Revised Swedish visual field standards for a driver's licence: Threshold perimetry as a predictor of eligibility according to the current Swedish and current Norwegian suprathreshold standards.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Acta Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-07 DOI:10.1111/aos.70111
Wid Saadi, Tomas Bro, Susanna Sagerfors
{"title":"Revised Swedish visual field standards for a driver's licence: Threshold perimetry as a predictor of eligibility according to the current Swedish and current Norwegian suprathreshold standards.","authors":"Wid Saadi, Tomas Bro, Susanna Sagerfors","doi":"10.1111/aos.70111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore whether threshold perimetry can predict fulfilment of the current Swedish and current Norwegian Esterman perimetry standards for Group 1 driver's licence, and differences in compliance between the former and current Swedish visual field standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included perimetry examinations from individuals aged ≥18 years who underwent threshold perimetry (24-2 or 30-2) and binocular Esterman visual field testing on the same day during September 2010 to December 2022. Data were collected over 12 years from three Departments of Ophthalmology in Region Örebro County, Sweden. Threshold perimetry data were used to predict fulfilment of the current Swedish and current Norwegian Esterman visual field standards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 798 individuals were included. Altogether (33%) failed the Swedish visual field standards for a Group 1 driver's licence in the past; by comparison, a significantly smaller proportion would have failed the current Swedish standards today, (18%) (p < 0.001; McNemar's test). Threshold perimetry, if all test points within the central 20° had values of ≥10 dB, could predict compliance with a sensitivity of 89% and 88% and a specificity of 73% and 78% for the current Swedish and current Norwegian Esterman standards, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Threshold perimetry may predict compliance with the current Swedish and current Norwegian Esterman visual field test standard for driving. A larger proportion of individuals may meet the current Swedish visual field standard for a Group 1 driver's licence compared with the former Swedish standard.</p>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":"e709-e717"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13460349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.70111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore whether threshold perimetry can predict fulfilment of the current Swedish and current Norwegian Esterman perimetry standards for Group 1 driver's licence, and differences in compliance between the former and current Swedish visual field standards.

Methods: This study included perimetry examinations from individuals aged ≥18 years who underwent threshold perimetry (24-2 or 30-2) and binocular Esterman visual field testing on the same day during September 2010 to December 2022. Data were collected over 12 years from three Departments of Ophthalmology in Region Örebro County, Sweden. Threshold perimetry data were used to predict fulfilment of the current Swedish and current Norwegian Esterman visual field standards.

Results: In all, 798 individuals were included. Altogether (33%) failed the Swedish visual field standards for a Group 1 driver's licence in the past; by comparison, a significantly smaller proportion would have failed the current Swedish standards today, (18%) (p < 0.001; McNemar's test). Threshold perimetry, if all test points within the central 20° had values of ≥10 dB, could predict compliance with a sensitivity of 89% and 88% and a specificity of 73% and 78% for the current Swedish and current Norwegian Esterman standards, respectively.

Conclusion: Threshold perimetry may predict compliance with the current Swedish and current Norwegian Esterman visual field test standard for driving. A larger proportion of individuals may meet the current Swedish visual field standard for a Group 1 driver's licence compared with the former Swedish standard.

修订的瑞典驾驶执照视野标准:根据当前瑞典和挪威的超阈值标准,阈值视野作为资格的预测指标。
目的:探讨阈值视距是否可以预测瑞典和挪威现行的Esterman驾驶执照视距标准的满足情况,以及瑞典现行视野标准和瑞典现行视野标准在依从性方面的差异。方法:本研究纳入了2010年9月至2022年12月期间,年龄≥18岁的患者在同一天接受阈值视野检查(24-2或30-2)和双眼Esterman视野检查。数据收集于瑞典Örebro县地区的三个眼科,历时12年。阈值视距数据用于预测当前瑞典和挪威伊斯特曼视野标准的满足情况。结果:共纳入798人。在过去,总共有33%的人没有达到瑞典第一组驾驶执照的视野标准;相比之下,今天不符合瑞典现行标准的比例要小得多,(18%)(p结论:阈值视野测量可以预测符合当前瑞典和挪威的伊斯特曼驾驶视野测试标准。与以前的瑞典标准相比,更大比例的人可能符合瑞典目前的第一类驾驶执照的视野标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书