{"title":"Impact of a Dental Vibratory Device on Self-Perceived Pain With a Dental Anesthetic Injection: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Studies.","authors":"Maryam Altuhafy, Ruqaya Lilo, Virda Baig, Vikranth Ravipati, Ghida Askar, Junad Khan","doi":"10.2344/24-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to evaluate the potential of dental vibratory devices (DVD) in dental anesthetic injections to improve patient comfort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024552433). A comprehensive electronic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed up to August 2024 using keywords related to dental vibratory devices, local anesthesia, and pain, and 1,081,360 manuscripts were revealed. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included comparing dental vibratory devices to other interventions or no intervention in patients receiving dental anesthetic injections. Two independent reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed study quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 RCTs were included, following the eligibility requirements. Various self-assessed pain tools, like the Visual Analog Scale, Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, and Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale, were used. Across 8 RCTs evaluating methods to reduce pain during dental needle injections, most reported a positive impact of distraction (eg, DVD) or vibration techniques on pain reduction, with significant improvements in patient comfort. Although some variability existed, most studies demonstrated reduced pain scores compared to controls, particularly when vibration was used. Only 2 studies showed less consistent or neutral outcomes. No significant adverse effects were reported across the interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the current evidence, a DVD may reduce pain related to dental anesthetic injections. Although effective, such devices may cause mild discomfort or tingling in sensitive patients and may be ineffective for those with high anxiety. Future standardized studies are needed to conclude the significance of dental vibratory devices for reducing pain in patients who receive dental anesthetic injections.</p>","PeriodicalId":94296,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"73 1","pages":"22-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12976867/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/24-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate the potential of dental vibratory devices (DVD) in dental anesthetic injections to improve patient comfort.
Methods: A systematic review followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024552433). A comprehensive electronic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed up to August 2024 using keywords related to dental vibratory devices, local anesthesia, and pain, and 1,081,360 manuscripts were revealed. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included comparing dental vibratory devices to other interventions or no intervention in patients receiving dental anesthetic injections. Two independent reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed study quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.
Results: A total of 12 RCTs were included, following the eligibility requirements. Various self-assessed pain tools, like the Visual Analog Scale, Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, and Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale, were used. Across 8 RCTs evaluating methods to reduce pain during dental needle injections, most reported a positive impact of distraction (eg, DVD) or vibration techniques on pain reduction, with significant improvements in patient comfort. Although some variability existed, most studies demonstrated reduced pain scores compared to controls, particularly when vibration was used. Only 2 studies showed less consistent or neutral outcomes. No significant adverse effects were reported across the interventions.
Conclusion: Based on the current evidence, a DVD may reduce pain related to dental anesthetic injections. Although effective, such devices may cause mild discomfort or tingling in sensitive patients and may be ineffective for those with high anxiety. Future standardized studies are needed to conclude the significance of dental vibratory devices for reducing pain in patients who receive dental anesthetic injections.
目的:本系统综述旨在评价牙科振动装置(DVD)在牙科麻醉注射中改善患者舒适度的潜力。方法:系统评价遵循PRISMA(首选报告项目用于系统评价和荟萃分析)指南,并在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024552433)。截止2024年8月,我们对PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane Library进行了全面的电子检索,检索关键词为牙科振动装置、局部麻醉和疼痛,共检索到1081360篇论文。仅纳入随机对照试验(rct),比较牙科振动装置与其他干预或不干预接受牙科麻醉注射的患者。两名独立审稿人筛选文章,提取数据,并使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。结果:共纳入12项rct,符合入选条件。使用了各种自我评估的疼痛工具,如视觉模拟量表、Wong-Baker面部疼痛评定量表和面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安慰量表。在评估减轻牙科针注射疼痛方法的8项随机对照试验中,大多数报告了分散(例如DVD)或振动技术对减轻疼痛的积极影响,显著改善了患者的舒适度。尽管存在一些可变性,但大多数研究表明,与对照组相比,疼痛评分有所降低,尤其是在使用振动时。只有2项研究的结果不太一致或中性。所有干预措施均未发现明显的不良反应。结论:根据目前的证据,DVD可以减轻与牙科麻醉注射相关的疼痛。虽然有效,但这种装置可能会对敏感患者造成轻微的不适或刺痛,对高度焦虑的患者可能无效。未来的标准化研究需要得出结论,牙科振动装置的意义,以减轻疼痛的患者接受牙科麻醉注射。