Asthma/COPD clinics increases adherence to management guidelines and associates with less morbidity and lower all-cause mortality - a prospective cohort study.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Jenny Nilsson, Helena Backman, Johanna Karlsson Sundbaum, Viktor Strandkvist, Linnea Hedman, Caroline Stridsman
{"title":"Asthma/COPD clinics increases adherence to management guidelines and associates with less morbidity and lower all-cause mortality - a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Jenny Nilsson, Helena Backman, Johanna Karlsson Sundbaum, Viktor Strandkvist, Linnea Hedman, Caroline Stridsman","doi":"10.1038/s41533-026-00497-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In asthma, suboptimal disease control is common due to limited knowledge about self-management, undertreatment and infrequent follow-up visits. Most patients are treated in primary care where asthma/COPD clinics (ACC) are recommended in Sweden, but evidence of the effects is limited. The aim was to compare certified ACCs with clinics providing regular care in terms of adherence to asthma management guidelines, and the associations with asthma symptom control, healthcare consumption, and mortality in adults with asthma. In this cohort study, we extracted data from the Swedish National Airway Register, on 84230 adults with asthma, cared for at certified ACCs (n = 17 primary care centres) and regular care clinics (n = 650 primary care centres) in Sweden. Data were linked to other national registers in order to obtain data about pharmaceuticals, healthcare consumption, and mortality. The index date was the years 2015-2017, and the study ended in 2022. A binary logistic regression was used to assess morbidity and mortality associations at the study's end. A higher proportion of patients at certified ACCs received interventions such as patient education, written asthma action plan, smoking cessation, Asthma Control Test, spirometry, and inhaled corticosteroids than patients at regular care clinics. Certified ACCs were associated with a lower probability of uncontrolled asthma (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.87), need of specialist/emergency care (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.92) and death (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.86). In conclusion, adherence to asthma management guidelines was higher in certified ACCs which were associated with a more well-controlled asthma, less secondary healthcare visits and lower all-cause mortality, but not with frequent exacerbations. Our findings highlight the importance of ACCs in providing evidence-based care in accordance with asthma management guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12992697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-026-00497-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In asthma, suboptimal disease control is common due to limited knowledge about self-management, undertreatment and infrequent follow-up visits. Most patients are treated in primary care where asthma/COPD clinics (ACC) are recommended in Sweden, but evidence of the effects is limited. The aim was to compare certified ACCs with clinics providing regular care in terms of adherence to asthma management guidelines, and the associations with asthma symptom control, healthcare consumption, and mortality in adults with asthma. In this cohort study, we extracted data from the Swedish National Airway Register, on 84230 adults with asthma, cared for at certified ACCs (n = 17 primary care centres) and regular care clinics (n = 650 primary care centres) in Sweden. Data were linked to other national registers in order to obtain data about pharmaceuticals, healthcare consumption, and mortality. The index date was the years 2015-2017, and the study ended in 2022. A binary logistic regression was used to assess morbidity and mortality associations at the study's end. A higher proportion of patients at certified ACCs received interventions such as patient education, written asthma action plan, smoking cessation, Asthma Control Test, spirometry, and inhaled corticosteroids than patients at regular care clinics. Certified ACCs were associated with a lower probability of uncontrolled asthma (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.87), need of specialist/emergency care (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.92) and death (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.86). In conclusion, adherence to asthma management guidelines was higher in certified ACCs which were associated with a more well-controlled asthma, less secondary healthcare visits and lower all-cause mortality, but not with frequent exacerbations. Our findings highlight the importance of ACCs in providing evidence-based care in accordance with asthma management guidelines.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项前瞻性队列研究表明,哮喘/慢性阻塞性肺病诊所增加了对管理指南的遵守,并降低了发病率和全因死亡率。
在哮喘中,由于自我管理知识有限、治疗不足和随访不频繁,疾病控制欠佳是常见的。大多数患者在瑞典推荐的哮喘/慢性阻塞性肺病诊所(ACC)的初级保健中接受治疗,但效果的证据有限。目的是比较经认证的ACCs与提供定期护理的诊所对哮喘管理指南的依从性,以及与哮喘症状控制、医疗保健消费和成人哮喘死亡率的关系。在这项队列研究中,我们从瑞典国家气道登记中提取了84230名哮喘成年人的数据,这些哮喘患者在瑞典认证的ACCs (n = 17个初级保健中心)和常规护理诊所(n = 650个初级保健中心)接受治疗。数据与其他国家登记册相联系,以便获得有关药品、保健消费和死亡率的数据。索引日期为2015-2017年,研究于2022年结束。在研究结束时,采用二元逻辑回归来评估发病率和死亡率的相关性。经认证的ACCs患者接受患者教育、书面哮喘行动计划、戒烟、哮喘控制试验、肺活量测定和吸入皮质类固醇等干预措施的比例高于常规护理诊所的患者。经认证的ACCs与哮喘不受控制(OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.87)、专科/急诊护理需求(OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.92)和死亡(OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.86)的概率较低相关。总之,在经认证的ACCs中,对哮喘管理指南的依从性更高,这与哮喘控制更良好、二次医疗就诊更少和全因死亡率更低有关,但与频繁发作无关。我们的研究结果强调了ACCs在根据哮喘管理指南提供循证护理方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine is an open access, online-only, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within the fields of primary care and respiratory medicine. We are particularly interested in receiving papers in relation to the following aspects of respiratory medicine, respiratory-related allergic diseases and tobacco control: epidemiology prevention clinical care service delivery and organisation of healthcare (including implementation science) global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书