Association of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use with clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and type 2 diabetes.

IF 3 3区 医学
Journal of Diabetes Investigation Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-07 DOI:10.1111/jdi.70281
Yu-Ting Yu, Ying Chun Lee, Yu-Wei Fang, Wen-Hui Hsieh, Ming-Hsien Tsai
{"title":"Association of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use with clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Yu-Ting Yu, Ying Chun Lee, Yu-Wei Fang, Wen-Hui Hsieh, Ming-Hsien Tsai","doi":"10.1111/jdi.70281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate whether glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are associated with improved survival and renal outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and type 2 diabetes, a population at high cardiometabolic risk.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using an active-comparator, new-user design within the TriNetX US Collaborative Network. Adults with rheumatoid arthritis and type 2 diabetes initiating GLP-1 RAs or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) between 2016 and 2023 were included. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major adverse kidney events (MAKE), and all-cause hospitalization. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox regression after 1:1 propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4,607 patients per group were followed for up to 4 years. GLP-1 RA use was associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.68; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.58-0.80), reduced MAKE (HR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97), and fewer hospitalizations (HR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.98), compared with DPP-4is. No significant difference was observed for MACE (HR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.89-1.04). Results were consistent across prespecified subgroups and sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with rheumatoid arthritis and type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 RA therapy was associated with 32% lower mortality, 11% fewer kidney events, and 8% fewer hospitalizations vs DPP-4is. These findings support GLP-1 RAs as a promising therapeutic option for this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"766-780"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13137280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.70281","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate whether glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are associated with improved survival and renal outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and type 2 diabetes, a population at high cardiometabolic risk.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using an active-comparator, new-user design within the TriNetX US Collaborative Network. Adults with rheumatoid arthritis and type 2 diabetes initiating GLP-1 RAs or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) between 2016 and 2023 were included. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major adverse kidney events (MAKE), and all-cause hospitalization. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox regression after 1:1 propensity score matching.

Results: A total of 4,607 patients per group were followed for up to 4 years. GLP-1 RA use was associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.68; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.58-0.80), reduced MAKE (HR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97), and fewer hospitalizations (HR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.98), compared with DPP-4is. No significant difference was observed for MACE (HR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.89-1.04). Results were consistent across prespecified subgroups and sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: In patients with rheumatoid arthritis and type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 RA therapy was associated with 32% lower mortality, 11% fewer kidney events, and 8% fewer hospitalizations vs DPP-4is. These findings support GLP-1 RAs as a promising therapeutic option for this high-risk population.

胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的使用与类风湿关节炎和2型糖尿病患者临床结局的关系
目的:评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)是否与类风湿关节炎和2型糖尿病患者(心脏代谢高风险人群)的生存率和肾脏预后改善相关。材料和方法:我们在TriNetX美国合作网络中使用主动比较器和新用户设计进行了回顾性队列研究。在2016年至2023年期间,患有类风湿性关节炎和2型糖尿病的成年人开始使用GLP-1 RAs或二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4is)。主要结局是全因死亡率;次要结局是主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、主要不良肾脏事件(MAKE)和全因住院。在1:1倾向评分匹配后,使用Cox回归估计风险比(hr)。结果:每组共4607例患者,随访时间长达4年。与dpp -4相比,GLP-1 RA的使用与更低的全因死亡率(HR 0.68; 95%可信区间(CI) 0.58-0.80)、更低的MAKE (HR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97)和更少的住院(HR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.98)相关。MACE无显著差异(HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.89-1.04)。结果在预先指定的亚组和敏感性分析中一致。结论:在类风湿性关节炎和2型糖尿病患者中,GLP-1 RA治疗与dpp -4相比,死亡率降低32%,肾脏事件减少11%,住院率降低8%。这些发现支持GLP-1 RAs作为一种有希望的治疗高危人群的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Journal of Diabetes Investigation Medicine-Internal Medicine
自引率
9.40%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes Investigation is your core diabetes journal from Asia; the official journal of the Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD). The journal publishes original research, country reports, commentaries, reviews, mini-reviews, case reports, letters, as well as editorials and news. Embracing clinical and experimental research in diabetes and related areas, the Journal of Diabetes Investigation includes aspects of prevention, treatment, as well as molecular aspects and pathophysiology. Translational research focused on the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers is also welcome. Journal of Diabetes Investigation is indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书