A systematic review of specialized psychosocial and complex psychosocial interventions for early psychosis, early depression, early bipolar disorder, and early borderline personality disorder.

IF 6.7
Andreas Bechdolf, Hendrik Müller, Daniel Richter, Stefan Weinmann, Thomas Becker, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Uta Gühne
{"title":"A systematic review of specialized psychosocial and complex psychosocial interventions for early psychosis, early depression, early bipolar disorder, and early borderline personality disorder.","authors":"Andreas Bechdolf, Hendrik Müller, Daniel Richter, Stefan Weinmann, Thomas Becker, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Uta Gühne","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2026.10158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review evaluates specialized psychosocial and complex interventions for early bipolar disorder (BD), early borderline personality disorder (BPD), early depression, early psychosis, and first-episode mental illness in general (FEMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions with psychosocial components, excluding trials that focused on pharmacological-only interventions and stand-alone psychotherapies. Searches were conducted in January 2023 across five databases. Review quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2 and risk of bias for RCTs using the Cochrane tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies met the inclusion criteria: seven reviews and three RCTs. High-to moderate-quality evidence supports complex psychosocial interventions combined with pharmacotherapy for early psychosis. The most robust effects were reductions in relapse and improvements in psychosocial functioning; additional benefits were observed for symptom burden, remission, treatment discontinuation, and hospital admissions. Benefits were most sustained in longer-duration, community-based programs. For early BD, limited evidence suggests that combining pharmacotherapy with family-focused therapy or structured psychoeducation may improve the course of illness and treatment satisfaction. One RCT in early BPD reported improved engagement with a developmentally tailored program. Two FEMI RCTs found that nurse-led psychoeducation and psychosocial programs improved in-patient duration, symptoms, insight, self-efficacy, quality of life, and engagement. No eligible studies addressed early-stage depression, indicating a notable evidence gap for multimodal psychosocial interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Complex psychosocial interventions are strongly supported for early psychosis. Preliminary data in BD, BPD, and FEMI suggest consistent benefits for engagement, but further rigorous trials - especially in early depression - focusing on different outcomes - are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":520621,"journal":{"name":"European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists","volume":" ","pages":"e47"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13122531/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2026.10158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This systematic review evaluates specialized psychosocial and complex interventions for early bipolar disorder (BD), early borderline personality disorder (BPD), early depression, early psychosis, and first-episode mental illness in general (FEMI).

Methods: We included systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions with psychosocial components, excluding trials that focused on pharmacological-only interventions and stand-alone psychotherapies. Searches were conducted in January 2023 across five databases. Review quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2 and risk of bias for RCTs using the Cochrane tool.

Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria: seven reviews and three RCTs. High-to moderate-quality evidence supports complex psychosocial interventions combined with pharmacotherapy for early psychosis. The most robust effects were reductions in relapse and improvements in psychosocial functioning; additional benefits were observed for symptom burden, remission, treatment discontinuation, and hospital admissions. Benefits were most sustained in longer-duration, community-based programs. For early BD, limited evidence suggests that combining pharmacotherapy with family-focused therapy or structured psychoeducation may improve the course of illness and treatment satisfaction. One RCT in early BPD reported improved engagement with a developmentally tailored program. Two FEMI RCTs found that nurse-led psychoeducation and psychosocial programs improved in-patient duration, symptoms, insight, self-efficacy, quality of life, and engagement. No eligible studies addressed early-stage depression, indicating a notable evidence gap for multimodal psychosocial interventions.

Conclusions: Complex psychosocial interventions are strongly supported for early psychosis. Preliminary data in BD, BPD, and FEMI suggest consistent benefits for engagement, but further rigorous trials - especially in early depression - focusing on different outcomes - are required.

对早期精神病、早期抑郁症、早期双相情感障碍和早期边缘型人格障碍的专业社会心理和复杂社会心理干预的系统回顾。
背景:本系统综述评估了早期双相情感障碍(BD)、早期边缘型人格障碍(BPD)、早期抑郁、早期精神病和首发精神疾病(FEMI)的专业心理社会和复杂干预措施。方法:我们纳入了系统评价和随机对照试验(rct)的干预与社会心理成分,排除试验的重点是药物干预和独立的心理治疗。搜索于2023年1月在五个数据库中进行。采用AMSTAR-2评价评价质量,采用Cochrane工具评价随机对照试验的偏倚风险。结果:10项研究符合纳入标准:7篇综述和3篇随机对照试验。高到中等质量的证据支持复杂的社会心理干预结合药物治疗早期精神病。最显著的效果是减少复发和改善社会心理功能;在症状负担、缓解、停止治疗和住院方面观察到额外的益处。在持续时间较长、以社区为基础的项目中,效益最为持续。对于早期双相障碍,有限的证据表明,将药物治疗与以家庭为中心的治疗或结构化的心理教育相结合,可能会改善病程和治疗满意度。早期BPD的一项随机对照试验报告称,通过量身定制的发展计划,患者的参与度有所提高。两项FEMI随机对照试验发现,护士主导的心理教育和社会心理项目改善了住院时间、症状、洞察力、自我效能感、生活质量和参与度。没有符合条件的研究涉及早期抑郁症,表明多模式社会心理干预存在显著的证据缺口。结论:复杂的社会心理干预是早期精神病治疗的有力支持。BD、BPD和FEMI的初步数据表明,参与的好处是一致的,但需要进一步严格的试验——尤其是在早期抑郁症中——关注不同的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书