Improving Questioning Skills of Nursing Faculty in the Clinical Learning Environment.

IF 1.9
The Journal of nursing education Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-09 DOI:10.3928/01484834-20251124-04
Jana M Goodwin, Nicole E Smith, Denise G Owens
{"title":"Improving Questioning Skills of Nursing Faculty in the Clinical Learning Environment.","authors":"Jana M Goodwin, Nicole E Smith, Denise G Owens","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20251124-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Literature indicates that clinical faculty across disciplines often ask lower-level recall and comprehension questions, limiting opportunities for students to develop clinical reasoning and judgment. This educational project aimed to enhance faculty's skills in higher order questioning by using application and analysis level questions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirteen clinical faculty teaching a junior-level baccalaureate medical surgical course attended a 2.5-hour virtual synchronous workshop on using the Questioning Aid for Rich and Real-Time Discussion (QARRD) tool. Questioning skills were assessed pre- and postworkshop, with follow-up surveys on QARRD usage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postworkshop data showed increased use of higher-order questions from 16% to 63.6%. Faculty reported varying QARRD use during the semester from rarely (11%), occasionally or sometimes (55%), and almost always (33%). When used, faculty perceived improved student critical thinking and treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The QARRD tool can strengthen clinical faculty's questioning techniques and potentially develop thinking, reasoning, and judgment in nursing students.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":" ","pages":"e69-e72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20251124-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Literature indicates that clinical faculty across disciplines often ask lower-level recall and comprehension questions, limiting opportunities for students to develop clinical reasoning and judgment. This educational project aimed to enhance faculty's skills in higher order questioning by using application and analysis level questions.

Method: Thirteen clinical faculty teaching a junior-level baccalaureate medical surgical course attended a 2.5-hour virtual synchronous workshop on using the Questioning Aid for Rich and Real-Time Discussion (QARRD) tool. Questioning skills were assessed pre- and postworkshop, with follow-up surveys on QARRD usage.

Results: Postworkshop data showed increased use of higher-order questions from 16% to 63.6%. Faculty reported varying QARRD use during the semester from rarely (11%), occasionally or sometimes (55%), and almost always (33%). When used, faculty perceived improved student critical thinking and treatment planning.

Conclusion: The QARRD tool can strengthen clinical faculty's questioning techniques and potentially develop thinking, reasoning, and judgment in nursing students.

临床学习环境下护理教师提问技巧的提高。
背景:文献表明,跨学科的临床教师经常提出较低水平的回忆和理解问题,限制了学生发展临床推理和判断的机会。这个教育项目旨在通过应用和分析水平的问题来提高教师在更高层次的问题中的技能。方法:13名教授医学外科初级课程的临床教师参加了2.5小时的虚拟同步研讨会,讨论如何使用问答辅助工具进行丰富和实时讨论(QARRD)。在研讨会前后对提问技巧进行评估,并对QARRD的使用情况进行跟踪调查。结果:工作坊后的数据显示,高阶问题的使用率从16%增加到63.6%。教师报告说,在学期内很少(11%)、偶尔或有时(55%)和几乎总是(33%)使用QARRD。当使用时,教师认为学生的批判性思维和治疗计划得到改善。结论:QARRD工具可以加强临床教师的提问技巧,培养护生的思维、推理和判断能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书