Feasibility of a Condensed EEG Curriculum Using a Procedural Based Learning Model.

IF 1.7
Clinical EEG and neuroscience Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-05 DOI:10.1177/15500594261430384
Alexandria Valdrighi, Susannah Cornes, Vanja Douglas, Audrey Foster-Barber, Ernesto Gonzalez-Giraldo
{"title":"Feasibility of a Condensed EEG Curriculum Using a Procedural Based Learning Model.","authors":"Alexandria Valdrighi, Susannah Cornes, Vanja Douglas, Audrey Foster-Barber, Ernesto Gonzalez-Giraldo","doi":"10.1177/15500594261430384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundNeurology residency time constraints limit requisite EEG training, contributing to discomfort with this core skill. EEG interpretation is a procedural skill, and educational models utilizing cognitive and procedural elements may increase education efficacy and efficiency. We applied the Fitts-Posner procedural model to create a condensed EEG curriculum and assessed feasibility and efficacy.MethodsWe identified EEG education barriers then designed a curriculum including asynchronous didactics, EEG reading/staffing, and report writing. The curriculum was incorporated 2023-2024 into a 2-week (adult neurology) or 4-week (child neurology) epilepsy rotation. We evaluated EEG interpretation knowledge and confidence before, after and following a 3-month delay and solicited feedback.ResultsPrimary barriers to EEG education were insufficient practice and clinical responsibility. Ninety percent (19/21) of residents completed the curriculum. Residents identified reading/staffing EEGs and writing reports as instrumental curriculum components. Compared with pre-rotation, confidence and knowledge increased immediately post-rotation and following a 3-month delay but were lower at 3-months than immediately post-rotation. Child neurology residents had higher confidence than adult residents on post and 3-month surveys despite no knowledge differences.ConclusionsA condensed EEG curriculum using a procedural learning model was associated with improved confidence and knowledge after a 3-month delay. Confidence and knowledge were lower at 3-months than immediately post-rotation, indicating the need for reinforcing activities. Confidence was higher for child neurology residents with two extra rotation weeks suggesting additional training may also enhance confidence gains. Asynchronous didactics maximized efficiency, but residents valued reading/staffing EEGs and writing reports, highlighting the importance of sociocultural approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":93940,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"351-357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13242535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594261430384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundNeurology residency time constraints limit requisite EEG training, contributing to discomfort with this core skill. EEG interpretation is a procedural skill, and educational models utilizing cognitive and procedural elements may increase education efficacy and efficiency. We applied the Fitts-Posner procedural model to create a condensed EEG curriculum and assessed feasibility and efficacy.MethodsWe identified EEG education barriers then designed a curriculum including asynchronous didactics, EEG reading/staffing, and report writing. The curriculum was incorporated 2023-2024 into a 2-week (adult neurology) or 4-week (child neurology) epilepsy rotation. We evaluated EEG interpretation knowledge and confidence before, after and following a 3-month delay and solicited feedback.ResultsPrimary barriers to EEG education were insufficient practice and clinical responsibility. Ninety percent (19/21) of residents completed the curriculum. Residents identified reading/staffing EEGs and writing reports as instrumental curriculum components. Compared with pre-rotation, confidence and knowledge increased immediately post-rotation and following a 3-month delay but were lower at 3-months than immediately post-rotation. Child neurology residents had higher confidence than adult residents on post and 3-month surveys despite no knowledge differences.ConclusionsA condensed EEG curriculum using a procedural learning model was associated with improved confidence and knowledge after a 3-month delay. Confidence and knowledge were lower at 3-months than immediately post-rotation, indicating the need for reinforcing activities. Confidence was higher for child neurology residents with two extra rotation weeks suggesting additional training may also enhance confidence gains. Asynchronous didactics maximized efficiency, but residents valued reading/staffing EEGs and writing reports, highlighting the importance of sociocultural approaches.

基于过程学习模型的脑电图浓缩课程的可行性。
背景:神经内科住院医师时间的限制限制了必要的脑电图训练,导致对这一核心技能的不适应。脑电解释是一种程序性技能,利用认知和程序元素的教育模式可以提高教育的有效性和效率。我们应用Fitts-Posner程序模型来创建一个精简的脑电图课程,并评估可行性和有效性。方法确定脑电图教育障碍,设计包括异步教学、脑电图阅读/人员配置和报告写作在内的课程。课程将于2023-2024年纳入2周(成人神经病学)或4周(儿童神经病学)癫痫轮转。我们在延迟3个月之前、之后和之后评估脑电图解释知识和信心,并征求反馈。结果脑电图教育的主要障碍是实践不足和临床责任不足。90%(19/21)的住院医师完成了课程。住院医师认为阅读/编制脑电图和写报告是重要的课程组成部分。与轮换前相比,信心和知识在轮换后和延迟3个月后立即增加,但在3个月时低于轮换后。儿童神经内科住院医师在事后和3个月的调查中比成人住院医师有更高的信心,尽管没有知识差异。结论采用程序性学习模式的精简脑电图课程可提高延迟3个月后的自信心和知识水平。信心和知识在3个月时低于轮调后立即,表明需要加强活动。有两个额外轮转周的儿童神经内科住院医生的信心更高,这表明额外的培训也可以增强信心。异步教学使效率最大化,但住院医生重视阅读/配备脑电图和撰写报告,强调了社会文化方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书