Body composition analysis and handgrip strength as predictors of 12-month mortality in hospitalized adults receiving parenteral nutrition: A descriptive cohort study
Natalia Montero Madrid RN, Raul Rodríguez Juárez MD, Rocío Fernández-Jiménez PhD, Alvaro Vidal Suarez MD, Patricia Guirado Peláez MD, Maria Angeles Martín-Fontalba RN, Beatriz Fernández Medina MD, Isabel Vegas Aguilar BSc, Maria del Mar Amaya Campos BSc, Victor Simón Frapolli MD, Maria Teresa Zarco Martín PhD, Francisco Tinahones-Madueño PhD, Maria Luisa Fernández Soto PhD, José Manuel García-Almeida PhD
{"title":"Body composition analysis and handgrip strength as predictors of 12-month mortality in hospitalized adults receiving parenteral nutrition: A descriptive cohort study","authors":"Natalia Montero Madrid RN, Raul Rodríguez Juárez MD, Rocío Fernández-Jiménez PhD, Alvaro Vidal Suarez MD, Patricia Guirado Peláez MD, Maria Angeles Martín-Fontalba RN, Beatriz Fernández Medina MD, Isabel Vegas Aguilar BSc, Maria del Mar Amaya Campos BSc, Victor Simón Frapolli MD, Maria Teresa Zarco Martín PhD, Francisco Tinahones-Madueño PhD, Maria Luisa Fernández Soto PhD, José Manuel García-Almeida PhD","doi":"10.1002/jpen.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Nutrition assessment in patients receiving parenteral nutrition often relies on classical parameters with limited prognostic value. Morphofunctional tools such as phase angle and handgrip strength measurement offer a more comprehensive evaluation of nutrition status and may better predict clinical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the predictive value of phase angle and handgrip strength for 12-month mortality in hospitalized patients receiving parenteral nutrition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective observational study was conducted in 614 patients treated with parenteral nutrition. Anthropometric assessments were realized. Morphofunctional assessments included bioelectrical impedance analysis to determine phase angle and dynamometry to measure handgrip strength. Survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier curves and cutoff values by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Six hundred fourteen patients received parenteral nutrition, with a mean age of 64 ± 14.6 years; 58.2% were male. After 1 year, the mortality rate was 26.1%, and the average hospital stay was 27.9 ± 23.8 days. Twelve-month survival was reduced in patients with low phase angle (57%) and low handgrip strength (62.8%) compared with those with preserved values (84% and 82.2%, respectively). In the multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index, each unit increase in phase angle and handgrip strength was associated with a 4% and 2% reduction in mortality odds, respectively (phase angle: odds ratio [OR], 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5–0.7; <i>P</i> < 0.001; handgrip strength: OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.9–1.0; <i>P</i> = 0.03624).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Phase angle and handgrip strength are predictors of 12-month mortality in patients receiving parenteral nutrition.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","volume":"50 3","pages":"412-420"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13047292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpen.70069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Nutrition assessment in patients receiving parenteral nutrition often relies on classical parameters with limited prognostic value. Morphofunctional tools such as phase angle and handgrip strength measurement offer a more comprehensive evaluation of nutrition status and may better predict clinical outcomes.
Objective
To evaluate the predictive value of phase angle and handgrip strength for 12-month mortality in hospitalized patients receiving parenteral nutrition.
Methods
A retrospective observational study was conducted in 614 patients treated with parenteral nutrition. Anthropometric assessments were realized. Morphofunctional assessments included bioelectrical impedance analysis to determine phase angle and dynamometry to measure handgrip strength. Survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier curves and cutoff values by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Results
Six hundred fourteen patients received parenteral nutrition, with a mean age of 64 ± 14.6 years; 58.2% were male. After 1 year, the mortality rate was 26.1%, and the average hospital stay was 27.9 ± 23.8 days. Twelve-month survival was reduced in patients with low phase angle (57%) and low handgrip strength (62.8%) compared with those with preserved values (84% and 82.2%, respectively). In the multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index, each unit increase in phase angle and handgrip strength was associated with a 4% and 2% reduction in mortality odds, respectively (phase angle: odds ratio [OR], 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5–0.7; P < 0.001; handgrip strength: OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.9–1.0; P = 0.03624).
Conclusion
Phase angle and handgrip strength are predictors of 12-month mortality in patients receiving parenteral nutrition.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (JPEN) is the premier scientific journal of nutrition and metabolic support. It publishes original peer-reviewed studies that define the cutting edge of basic and clinical research in the field. It explores the science of optimizing the care of patients receiving enteral or IV therapies. Also included: reviews, techniques, brief reports, case reports, and abstracts.