Group Sparse Representation Enhances Brain Network Classification of Major Depressive Disorder in Two Chinese Cohorts.

IF 3.5 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Alpha psychiatry Pub Date : 2026-02-25 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI:10.31083/AP40685
Defu Zhang, Cancan Lin, Aoxue Zhang, Xubo Wang, Wenjie Xia, Yue Wang, Yuxin Du, Hao Yu, Shanling Ji
{"title":"Group Sparse Representation Enhances Brain Network Classification of Major Depressive Disorder in Two Chinese Cohorts.","authors":"Defu Zhang, Cancan Lin, Aoxue Zhang, Xubo Wang, Wenjie Xia, Yue Wang, Yuxin Du, Hao Yu, Shanling Ji","doi":"10.31083/AP40685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with altered organization of functional brain networks. This study aims to evaluate the classification efficacy of three brain networks constructed by Pearson correlation (PC), sparse representation (SR), and group sparse representation (GSR) in distinguishing patients with MDD from healthy controls (HCs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study involved the recruitment of 117 Chinese participants, comprising 61 individuals diagnosed with MDD and 56 HCs, all of whom underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Brain time-series signals were extracted from 116 regions to construct whole-brain networks utilizing PC, SR, and GSR. A linear support vector machine (SVM) classifier with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) feature selection was trained using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) to optimize generalizability. An independent dataset of Chinese (124 first-episode drug-naïve MDD and 105 HCs) was utilized for additional validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the PC and SR, the GSR network yielded superior classification results, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85, an accuracy of 0.81, and a sensitivity of 0.95. Similar results were observed in the independent MDD dataset. We identified 17 brain connections and 27 brain regions within the GSR network.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the adoption of GSR-based brain networks as a robust tool for MDD diagnosis, challenging the conventional reliance on PC in neuroimaging research.</p>","PeriodicalId":72151,"journal":{"name":"Alpha psychiatry","volume":"27 1","pages":"40685"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12957975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/AP40685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with altered organization of functional brain networks. This study aims to evaluate the classification efficacy of three brain networks constructed by Pearson correlation (PC), sparse representation (SR), and group sparse representation (GSR) in distinguishing patients with MDD from healthy controls (HCs).

Methods: The present study involved the recruitment of 117 Chinese participants, comprising 61 individuals diagnosed with MDD and 56 HCs, all of whom underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Brain time-series signals were extracted from 116 regions to construct whole-brain networks utilizing PC, SR, and GSR. A linear support vector machine (SVM) classifier with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) feature selection was trained using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) to optimize generalizability. An independent dataset of Chinese (124 first-episode drug-naïve MDD and 105 HCs) was utilized for additional validation.

Results: Compared to the PC and SR, the GSR network yielded superior classification results, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85, an accuracy of 0.81, and a sensitivity of 0.95. Similar results were observed in the independent MDD dataset. We identified 17 brain connections and 27 brain regions within the GSR network.

Conclusions: Our findings support the adoption of GSR-based brain networks as a robust tool for MDD diagnosis, challenging the conventional reliance on PC in neuroimaging research.

背景:重度抑郁障碍(MDD)与功能性脑网络组织的改变有关。本研究旨在评估Pearson correlation (PC)、sparse representation (SR)和group sparse representation (GSR)构建的三种脑网络在区分MDD患者和健康对照(hc)中的分类效果。方法:本研究招募了117名中国参与者,包括61名诊断为重度抑郁症和56名hcc的个体,他们都接受了功能磁共振成像(fMRI)检查。从116个脑区提取时间序列信号,利用PC、SR和GSR构建全脑网络。利用留一交叉验证(LOOCV)优化可泛化性,对具有最小绝对收缩和LASSO特征选择的线性支持向量机(SVM)分类器进行了训练。使用一个独立的中国人数据集(124例首发drug-naïve MDD和105例hcc)进行进一步验证。结果:与PC法和SR法相比,GSR法的分类效果更好,受者工作特征曲线下面积为0.85,准确率为0.81,灵敏度为0.95。在独立的MDD数据集中也观察到类似的结果。我们在GSR网络中确定了17个大脑连接和27个大脑区域。结论:我们的研究结果支持采用基于gsr的脑网络作为MDD诊断的强大工具,挑战了传统的神经影像学研究中对PC的依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书