{"title":"Development and Validation of Prediction Models for Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Based on Periodic Health Examinations","authors":"Kyoka Kanno, Hiromasa Ogawa, Toshiya Irokawa, Shinya Ohkouchi, Masao Tabata, Natsuko Ohko, Hajime Kurosawa","doi":"10.1111/crj.70177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is not only associated with reduced work efficiency and an elevated risk of occupational accidents but also with hypertension, diabetes, and other lifestyle-related diseases, making it an important occupational health concern. Conventional questionnaire–based screening may fail to detect OSA because it frequently lacks subjective symptoms. Herein, we aimed to develop and validate a simple objective, questionnaire-independent prediction model for severe OSA using periodic health examination (PHE) data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Following the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD), we analyzed the data of 671 patients who underwent overnight polysomnography (PSG) at Tohoku University Hospital. Eight predictors—age group, sex, obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, polycythemia, and liver dysfunction—derived from routine PHE items—were included in logistic regression models to predict severe OSA, defined as an apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 30 or a 3% oxygen desaturation index (ODI) ≥ 30. Internal validity was assessed using bootstrap samples. External validation was performed using overnight percutaneous oxygen saturation data of 100 university employees.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.67 and 0.72 for the AHI- and ODI-based models, respectively. The internal validity was generally acceptable. In external validation, the AHI model had a sensitivity and specificity of 1.00 and 0.95, respectively, while the ODI model exhibited values of 0.50 and 0.97, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We developed and validated two predictive models for severe OSA using the PHE data. These models could be used for screening by occupational physicians and clinicians.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55247,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12962870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/crj.70177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is not only associated with reduced work efficiency and an elevated risk of occupational accidents but also with hypertension, diabetes, and other lifestyle-related diseases, making it an important occupational health concern. Conventional questionnaire–based screening may fail to detect OSA because it frequently lacks subjective symptoms. Herein, we aimed to develop and validate a simple objective, questionnaire-independent prediction model for severe OSA using periodic health examination (PHE) data.
Methods
Following the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD), we analyzed the data of 671 patients who underwent overnight polysomnography (PSG) at Tohoku University Hospital. Eight predictors—age group, sex, obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, polycythemia, and liver dysfunction—derived from routine PHE items—were included in logistic regression models to predict severe OSA, defined as an apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 30 or a 3% oxygen desaturation index (ODI) ≥ 30. Internal validity was assessed using bootstrap samples. External validation was performed using overnight percutaneous oxygen saturation data of 100 university employees.
Results
The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.67 and 0.72 for the AHI- and ODI-based models, respectively. The internal validity was generally acceptable. In external validation, the AHI model had a sensitivity and specificity of 1.00 and 0.95, respectively, while the ODI model exhibited values of 0.50 and 0.97, respectively.
Conclusion
We developed and validated two predictive models for severe OSA using the PHE data. These models could be used for screening by occupational physicians and clinicians.
期刊介绍:
Overview
Effective with the 2016 volume, this journal will be published in an online-only format.
Aims and Scope
The Clinical Respiratory Journal (CRJ) provides a forum for clinical research in all areas of respiratory medicine from clinical lung disease to basic research relevant to the clinic.
We publish original research, review articles, case studies, editorials and book reviews in all areas of clinical lung disease including:
Asthma
Allergy
COPD
Non-invasive ventilation
Sleep related breathing disorders
Interstitial lung diseases
Lung cancer
Clinical genetics
Rhinitis
Airway and lung infection
Epidemiology
Pediatrics
CRJ provides a fast-track service for selected Phase II and Phase III trial studies.
Keywords
Clinical Respiratory Journal, respiratory, pulmonary, medicine, clinical, lung disease,
Abstracting and Indexing Information
Academic Search (EBSCO Publishing)
Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing)
Embase (Elsevier)
Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest)
Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest)
HEED: Health Economic Evaluations Database (Wiley-Blackwell)
Hospital Premium Collection (ProQuest)
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics)
MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM)
ProQuest Central (ProQuest)
Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate Analytics)
SCOPUS (Elsevier)