Development and Validation of Prediction Models for Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Based on Periodic Health Examinations

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Kyoka Kanno, Hiromasa Ogawa, Toshiya Irokawa, Shinya Ohkouchi, Masao Tabata, Natsuko Ohko, Hajime Kurosawa
{"title":"Development and Validation of Prediction Models for Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Based on Periodic Health Examinations","authors":"Kyoka Kanno,&nbsp;Hiromasa Ogawa,&nbsp;Toshiya Irokawa,&nbsp;Shinya Ohkouchi,&nbsp;Masao Tabata,&nbsp;Natsuko Ohko,&nbsp;Hajime Kurosawa","doi":"10.1111/crj.70177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is not only associated with reduced work efficiency and an elevated risk of occupational accidents but also with hypertension, diabetes, and other lifestyle-related diseases, making it an important occupational health concern. Conventional questionnaire–based screening may fail to detect OSA because it frequently lacks subjective symptoms. Herein, we aimed to develop and validate a simple objective, questionnaire-independent prediction model for severe OSA using periodic health examination (PHE) data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Following the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD), we analyzed the data of 671 patients who underwent overnight polysomnography (PSG) at Tohoku University Hospital. Eight predictors—age group, sex, obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, polycythemia, and liver dysfunction—derived from routine PHE items—were included in logistic regression models to predict severe OSA, defined as an apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 30 or a 3% oxygen desaturation index (ODI) ≥ 30. Internal validity was assessed using bootstrap samples. External validation was performed using overnight percutaneous oxygen saturation data of 100 university employees.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.67 and 0.72 for the AHI- and ODI-based models, respectively. The internal validity was generally acceptable. In external validation, the AHI model had a sensitivity and specificity of 1.00 and 0.95, respectively, while the ODI model exhibited values of 0.50 and 0.97, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We developed and validated two predictive models for severe OSA using the PHE data. These models could be used for screening by occupational physicians and clinicians.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55247,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12962870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/crj.70177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is not only associated with reduced work efficiency and an elevated risk of occupational accidents but also with hypertension, diabetes, and other lifestyle-related diseases, making it an important occupational health concern. Conventional questionnaire–based screening may fail to detect OSA because it frequently lacks subjective symptoms. Herein, we aimed to develop and validate a simple objective, questionnaire-independent prediction model for severe OSA using periodic health examination (PHE) data.

Methods

Following the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD), we analyzed the data of 671 patients who underwent overnight polysomnography (PSG) at Tohoku University Hospital. Eight predictors—age group, sex, obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, polycythemia, and liver dysfunction—derived from routine PHE items—were included in logistic regression models to predict severe OSA, defined as an apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 30 or a 3% oxygen desaturation index (ODI) ≥ 30. Internal validity was assessed using bootstrap samples. External validation was performed using overnight percutaneous oxygen saturation data of 100 university employees.

Results

The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.67 and 0.72 for the AHI- and ODI-based models, respectively. The internal validity was generally acceptable. In external validation, the AHI model had a sensitivity and specificity of 1.00 and 0.95, respectively, while the ODI model exhibited values of 0.50 and 0.97, respectively.

Conclusion

We developed and validated two predictive models for severe OSA using the PHE data. These models could be used for screening by occupational physicians and clinicians.

Abstract Image

基于定期健康检查的严重阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停预测模型的建立与验证。
梗阻性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)不仅与工作效率降低和职业事故风险增加有关,而且与高血压、糖尿病和其他与生活方式相关的疾病有关,使其成为一个重要的职业健康问题。传统的基于问卷的筛查可能无法检测到OSA,因为它往往缺乏主观症状。在此,我们旨在利用定期健康检查(PHE)数据开发并验证一个简单客观、不依赖于问卷的严重OSA预测模型。方法:根据透明报告的个体预后或诊断多变量预测模型(TRIPOD),我们分析了在东北大学医院接受过夜多导睡眠图(PSG)治疗的671例患者的数据。8个预测因素——年龄组、性别、肥胖、高血压、糖尿病、血脂异常、红细胞增生症和肝功能障碍——来自常规PHE项目——被纳入logistic回归模型,以预测重度OSA,定义为呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)≥30或3%氧去饱和指数(ODI)≥30。采用自举样本评估内部效度。外部验证使用100名大学员工的夜间经皮氧饱和度数据进行。结果:AHI和odi模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.67和0.72。内部效度普遍可以接受。在外部验证中,AHI模型的敏感性和特异性分别为1.00和0.95,ODI模型的敏感性和特异性分别为0.50和0.97。结论:我们利用PHE数据建立并验证了两种严重OSA的预测模型。这些模型可用于职业医生和临床医生的筛选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Respiratory Journal
Clinical Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Overview Effective with the 2016 volume, this journal will be published in an online-only format. Aims and Scope The Clinical Respiratory Journal (CRJ) provides a forum for clinical research in all areas of respiratory medicine from clinical lung disease to basic research relevant to the clinic. We publish original research, review articles, case studies, editorials and book reviews in all areas of clinical lung disease including: Asthma Allergy COPD Non-invasive ventilation Sleep related breathing disorders Interstitial lung diseases Lung cancer Clinical genetics Rhinitis Airway and lung infection Epidemiology Pediatrics CRJ provides a fast-track service for selected Phase II and Phase III trial studies. Keywords Clinical Respiratory Journal, respiratory, pulmonary, medicine, clinical, lung disease, Abstracting and Indexing Information Academic Search (EBSCO Publishing) Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing) Embase (Elsevier) Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest) HEED: Health Economic Evaluations Database (Wiley-Blackwell) Hospital Premium Collection (ProQuest) Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics) MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM) ProQuest Central (ProQuest) Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate Analytics) SCOPUS (Elsevier)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书