The Safety, Efficacy, and Feasibility of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in a Population With Bipolar Disorder During Depressive Episodes: A Pilot Parallel Arm Randomized Controlled Trial: Sécurité, efficacité et faisabilité de la transplantation de microbiote fécal chez une population atteinte de troubles bipolaires, au cours d'épisodes dépressifs : essai pilote contrôlé à répartition aléatoire et à groupes parallèles.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Shahrokh Shekarriz, Simone N Vigod, Teresa Bianco, Asem Bala, Chenhui Hao, Johane P Allard, Susy Hota, Susan Poutanen, Michael G Surette, Valerie H Taylor
{"title":"The Safety, Efficacy, and Feasibility of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in a Population With Bipolar Disorder During Depressive Episodes: A Pilot Parallel Arm Randomized Controlled Trial: Sécurité, efficacité et faisabilité de la transplantation de microbiote fécal chez une population atteinte de troubles bipolaires, au cours d'épisodes dépressifs : essai pilote contrôlé à répartition aléatoire et à groupes parallèles.","authors":"Shahrokh Shekarriz, Simone N Vigod, Teresa Bianco, Asem Bala, Chenhui Hao, Johane P Allard, Susy Hota, Susan Poutanen, Michael G Surette, Valerie H Taylor","doi":"10.1177/07067437261420877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe gut microbiome has been proposed as a potential modifiable target to treat mental illness. This double-blind randomized control trial investigated fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) in bipolar disorder (BD) to assess efficacy, safety, and feasibility. The primary outcome evaluated the effectiveness of standard approved therapy for BD depression + FMT in individuals not responding to standard treatment, measured by change in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score from baseline to week 24. Secondary outcomes included FMT's impact on anxiety, global function, side-effects, and safety. The feasibility of this novel intervention was also assessed. Microbial analysis utilized whole-genome shotgun metagenomic sequencing, comparing outcomes between allogenic (donor) and autologous (participants own) FMT.MethodsA total of 35 participants (28 women and 7 men) with at least moderate depressive-phase BD (MADRS) were randomized to receive either allogenic FMT (n = 17) or autologous FMT (n = 18) via colonoscopy and were followed for 24 weeks.ResultsMADRS scores significantly improved from baseline to the last visit in both treatment arms. There was no significant difference between allogenic FMT (16.74-point improvement) and autologous FMT (15.4-point improvement) regarding clinical efficacy (t = -0.47, p-value = .64, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -7.3-4.6). Microbiota analysis showed that allogenic FMT let to a bacterial profile similar to the healthy donor and increased bacterial diversity at the 6-month mark, whereas those receiving autologous FMT did not. The intervention was well tolerated with no significant adverse events. Recruitment, randomization, and retention metrics support feasibility of a larger trial.ConclusionFeasibility and tolerability data indicate further investigation into microbial manipulation in BD is warranted. The absence of efficacy differences between the two types of FMT, despite microbial change, highlights the importance of a true placebo in future studies, as well as the importance of understanding exactly what bacteria are linked to improvements. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT0327922Plain Language Summary TitleResults of a Double-Blind Randomized Control Trial Investigating Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) as an Add-on Treatment for Depression in Bipolar Disorder and Analyzing Microbial Diversity Changes Over 24 Weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"675-690"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12962988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437261420877","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe gut microbiome has been proposed as a potential modifiable target to treat mental illness. This double-blind randomized control trial investigated fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) in bipolar disorder (BD) to assess efficacy, safety, and feasibility. The primary outcome evaluated the effectiveness of standard approved therapy for BD depression + FMT in individuals not responding to standard treatment, measured by change in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score from baseline to week 24. Secondary outcomes included FMT's impact on anxiety, global function, side-effects, and safety. The feasibility of this novel intervention was also assessed. Microbial analysis utilized whole-genome shotgun metagenomic sequencing, comparing outcomes between allogenic (donor) and autologous (participants own) FMT.MethodsA total of 35 participants (28 women and 7 men) with at least moderate depressive-phase BD (MADRS) were randomized to receive either allogenic FMT (n = 17) or autologous FMT (n = 18) via colonoscopy and were followed for 24 weeks.ResultsMADRS scores significantly improved from baseline to the last visit in both treatment arms. There was no significant difference between allogenic FMT (16.74-point improvement) and autologous FMT (15.4-point improvement) regarding clinical efficacy (t = -0.47, p-value = .64, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -7.3-4.6). Microbiota analysis showed that allogenic FMT let to a bacterial profile similar to the healthy donor and increased bacterial diversity at the 6-month mark, whereas those receiving autologous FMT did not. The intervention was well tolerated with no significant adverse events. Recruitment, randomization, and retention metrics support feasibility of a larger trial.ConclusionFeasibility and tolerability data indicate further investigation into microbial manipulation in BD is warranted. The absence of efficacy differences between the two types of FMT, despite microbial change, highlights the importance of a true placebo in future studies, as well as the importance of understanding exactly what bacteria are linked to improvements. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT0327922Plain Language Summary TitleResults of a Double-Blind Randomized Control Trial Investigating Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) as an Add-on Treatment for Depression in Bipolar Disorder and Analyzing Microbial Diversity Changes Over 24 Weeks.

“安全、有效性和可行性Fecal Microbiota移植in With a人口双Disorder During Depressive件:a Pilot Parallel Arm的随机控制试验:安全性、有效性和可行性的粪便微生物移植家里人口患有双相情感障碍、抑郁发作的期间:受控试验随机分布及平行组。
肠道微生物群已被认为是治疗精神疾病的潜在可修改靶点。这项双盲随机对照试验研究了粪便微生物群移植(FMT)治疗双相情感障碍(BD)的疗效、安全性和可行性。主要结局是通过Montgomery-Åsberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评分从基线到第24周的变化来评估标准批准治疗对标准治疗无反应的双相抑郁+ FMT个体的有效性。次要结局包括FMT对焦虑、整体功能、副作用和安全性的影响。我们还评估了这种新型干预措施的可行性。微生物分析利用全基因组散弹枪宏基因组测序,比较异体(供体)和自体(参与者自己)FMT的结果。方法35例中度抑郁期BD (MADRS)患者(28名女性和7名男性)通过结肠镜随机接受同种异体FMT (n = 17)或自体FMT (n = 18),随访24周。结果两组患者的smadrs评分从基线到最后一次就诊均有显著提高。同种异体FMT与自体FMT的临床疗效差异无统计学意义(t = -0.47, p值=)。64, 95%可信区间[CI] = -7.3-4.6)。微生物群分析显示,同种异体FMT使细菌谱与健康供体相似,并在6个月时增加了细菌多样性,而接受自体FMT的人则没有。该干预措施耐受性良好,无明显不良事件。招募、随机化和保留指标支持更大规模试验的可行性。结论可行性和耐受性数据表明,有必要进一步研究微生物治疗BD的方法。尽管微生物发生了变化,但两种类型的FMT之间没有疗效差异,这突出了在未来研究中真正的安慰剂的重要性,以及确切了解哪些细菌与改善有关的重要性。ClinicalTrials.gov NCT0327922。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1956, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (The CJP) has been keeping psychiatrists up-to-date on the latest research for nearly 60 years. The CJP provides a forum for psychiatry and mental health professionals to share their findings with researchers and clinicians. The CJP includes peer-reviewed scientific articles analyzing ongoing developments in Canadian and international psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书