Subphenotype- and complication-guided adjunctive fosfomycin versus standard monotherapy in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: pooled analysis of two randomised trials

IF 15.7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lancet Regional Health-Europe Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.lanepe.2026.101611
Francesc Escrihuela-Vidal , Julia García Larrauri , Joaquín López-Contreras , Gorane Euba , Andrea Vázquez , Silvia Gómez-Zorrilla , Luis Eduardo López-Cortés , Oriol Gasch , Eduardo Aparicio-Minguijón , Rosa Escudero-Sánchez , María Teresa Pérez-Rodríguez , Dolors Rodríguez-Pardo , Alfredo Jover-Sáenz , Graciano García-Pardo , Jesús Rodríguez-Baño , Miquel Pujol , Jordi Carratalà , Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez
{"title":"Subphenotype- and complication-guided adjunctive fosfomycin versus standard monotherapy in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: pooled analysis of two randomised trials","authors":"Francesc Escrihuela-Vidal ,&nbsp;Julia García Larrauri ,&nbsp;Joaquín López-Contreras ,&nbsp;Gorane Euba ,&nbsp;Andrea Vázquez ,&nbsp;Silvia Gómez-Zorrilla ,&nbsp;Luis Eduardo López-Cortés ,&nbsp;Oriol Gasch ,&nbsp;Eduardo Aparicio-Minguijón ,&nbsp;Rosa Escudero-Sánchez ,&nbsp;María Teresa Pérez-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Dolors Rodríguez-Pardo ,&nbsp;Alfredo Jover-Sáenz ,&nbsp;Graciano García-Pardo ,&nbsp;Jesús Rodríguez-Baño ,&nbsp;Miquel Pujol ,&nbsp;Jordi Carratalà ,&nbsp;Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2026.101611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Randomised trials of combination therapies for <em>S. aureus</em> bacteraemia (SAB) have failed to improve clinical outcomes—likely reflecting the lack of risk-targeted patient selection. The FEN-AUREUS classification enables early risk stratification based on clinical subphenotypes. We aimed to validate this framework in a pooled trial cohort and assess whether combining subphenotypes with IDSA-defined complicated SAB could identify patients most likely to benefit from adjunctive fosfomycin.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a post-hoc analysis of individual-level data from two multicentre randomised trials evaluating adjunctive fosfomycin in SAB. Participants were classified according to the FEN-AUREUS framework into phenotypes and risk subphenotypes. Associations between subphenotype, complicated bacteraemia, and 60-day mortality as the primary outcome and 30-day mortality and 8-week treatment success as secondary outcomes were assessed. A DOOR analysis provided an integrated assessment of overall outcomes. This study is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT07155590</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Among 369 patients (median age 68 years, IQR 56–78; 262/369 [68·8%] male), high-risk subphenotypes were associated with greater 60-day mortality (23·2% versus 6·6%; risk ratio [RR] 3·49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1·87–6·52; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3·38, 1·69–6·78), regardless of complication status. Combining risk subphenotypes with the IDSA classification showed heterogeneity in response to adjunctive fosfomycin. In patients with low-risk and uncomplicated SAB (n = 107), 60-day mortality was low with both monotherapy and adjunctive fosfomycin (2·1% versus 3·4%; risk difference [RD] −1·3% [95% CI −7·4 to 4·8]; p = 0·68), and treatment success at week 8 exceeded 89%. In the intermediate strata, 60-day mortality was 18·8% with monotherapy versus 7·4% (RD 11·3% [95% CI −5·4 to 28·1]; p = 0·20) with adjunctive fosfomycin in low-risk/complicated SAB (n = 59), and 15·0% versus 22·8% (RD −7·8% [95% CI −19·9 to 4·3]; p = 0·21) in high-risk/uncomplicated SAB (n = 159); week-8 treatment success was 78·1% versus 88·9% and 61·3% versus 54·4%, respectively. By contrast, in high-risk, complicated SAB (n = 44), adjunctive fosfomycin was associated with higher treatment success (25·8% versus 69·2%; RD −43·4% [−72·9 to −14·0]; p = 0·007) and a non-significant reduction in 60-day mortality (45·2% versus 23·1%). DOOR analysis suggested a more favourable overall outcome profile with adjunctive therapy in this subgroup.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Integrating early risk subphenotyping with IDSA complication criteria may enable more precise identification of SAB patients who may benefit from intensified therapy, while supporting monotherapy in those at lowest risk. This stratified approach provides a practical framework to refine patient selection for future trials and personalised therapeutic strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div><span>Instituto de Salud Carlos III</span>, Madrid, Spain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101611"},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776226000232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Randomised trials of combination therapies for S. aureus bacteraemia (SAB) have failed to improve clinical outcomes—likely reflecting the lack of risk-targeted patient selection. The FEN-AUREUS classification enables early risk stratification based on clinical subphenotypes. We aimed to validate this framework in a pooled trial cohort and assess whether combining subphenotypes with IDSA-defined complicated SAB could identify patients most likely to benefit from adjunctive fosfomycin.

Methods

We conducted a post-hoc analysis of individual-level data from two multicentre randomised trials evaluating adjunctive fosfomycin in SAB. Participants were classified according to the FEN-AUREUS framework into phenotypes and risk subphenotypes. Associations between subphenotype, complicated bacteraemia, and 60-day mortality as the primary outcome and 30-day mortality and 8-week treatment success as secondary outcomes were assessed. A DOOR analysis provided an integrated assessment of overall outcomes. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT07155590.

Findings

Among 369 patients (median age 68 years, IQR 56–78; 262/369 [68·8%] male), high-risk subphenotypes were associated with greater 60-day mortality (23·2% versus 6·6%; risk ratio [RR] 3·49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1·87–6·52; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3·38, 1·69–6·78), regardless of complication status. Combining risk subphenotypes with the IDSA classification showed heterogeneity in response to adjunctive fosfomycin. In patients with low-risk and uncomplicated SAB (n = 107), 60-day mortality was low with both monotherapy and adjunctive fosfomycin (2·1% versus 3·4%; risk difference [RD] −1·3% [95% CI −7·4 to 4·8]; p = 0·68), and treatment success at week 8 exceeded 89%. In the intermediate strata, 60-day mortality was 18·8% with monotherapy versus 7·4% (RD 11·3% [95% CI −5·4 to 28·1]; p = 0·20) with adjunctive fosfomycin in low-risk/complicated SAB (n = 59), and 15·0% versus 22·8% (RD −7·8% [95% CI −19·9 to 4·3]; p = 0·21) in high-risk/uncomplicated SAB (n = 159); week-8 treatment success was 78·1% versus 88·9% and 61·3% versus 54·4%, respectively. By contrast, in high-risk, complicated SAB (n = 44), adjunctive fosfomycin was associated with higher treatment success (25·8% versus 69·2%; RD −43·4% [−72·9 to −14·0]; p = 0·007) and a non-significant reduction in 60-day mortality (45·2% versus 23·1%). DOOR analysis suggested a more favourable overall outcome profile with adjunctive therapy in this subgroup.

Interpretation

Integrating early risk subphenotyping with IDSA complication criteria may enable more precise identification of SAB patients who may benefit from intensified therapy, while supporting monotherapy in those at lowest risk. This stratified approach provides a practical framework to refine patient selection for future trials and personalised therapeutic strategies.

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

亚表型和并发症引导的辅助磷霉素与标准单药治疗金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症:两项随机试验的汇总分析
背景:金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症(SAB)联合治疗的随机试验未能改善临床结果,这可能反映了缺乏针对风险的患者选择。FEN-AUREUS分类能够基于临床亚表型进行早期风险分层。我们的目的是在一项合并试验队列中验证这一框架,并评估将亚表型与idsa定义的复杂SAB结合是否可以识别最有可能从辅助磷霉素中获益的患者。方法:我们对两项多中心随机试验的个体水平数据进行事后分析,以评估磷霉素在SAB中的辅助治疗作用。根据FEN-AUREUS框架将参与者分为表型和风险亚表型。评估亚表型、复杂菌血症和60天死亡率作为主要结局,以及30天死亡率和8周治疗成功作为次要结局之间的关系。DOOR分析提供了对总体结果的综合评估。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT07155590。结果:在369例患者(中位年龄68岁,IQR为56-78;男性为262/369[68.8%])中,高危亚表型与较高的60天死亡率相关(23.2%对6.6%;风险比[RR] 3.49, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.87 - 6.52;校正风险比[aHR] 3.38, 1.69 - 6.78),与并发症状态无关。将危险亚表型与IDSA分类相结合,发现对辅助磷霉素的反应存在异质性。在低风险、无并发症的SAB患者(n = 107)中,单药治疗和辅助使用磷霉素的60天死亡率都很低(2.1% vs . 3.4%;风险差[RD] - 1.3% [95% CI - 7.4 ~ 4.8]; p = 0.68),第8周的治疗成功率超过89%。在中间阶段,低风险/复杂SAB (n = 59)中,单药组60天死亡率为18.8%,辅助磷霉素组为7.4% (RD为11.3% [95% CI - 5.4至28.1],p = 0.20);高风险/无复杂SAB (n = 159)中,单药组60天死亡率为15.0%,辅助磷霉素组为22.8% (RD为- 7.8% [95% CI - 5.9至4.3],p = 0.21);第8周的治疗成功率分别为78.1%对88.9%和61.3%对54.4%。相比之下,在高风险,复杂的SAB (n = 44)中,辅助磷霉素与更高的治疗成功率相关(25.8%比69.2%;RD - 43.4%[- 72.9至- 14.0];p = 0.007), 60天死亡率无显著降低(45.2%比23.1%)。DOOR分析表明,在该亚组中,辅助治疗的总体结果更有利。解释:将早期风险亚表型与IDSA并发症标准相结合,可以更精确地识别可能受益于强化治疗的SAB患者,同时支持对风险最低的患者进行单药治疗。这种分层的方法提供了一个实用的框架,以完善患者选择,为未来的试验和个性化的治疗策略。资助:西班牙马德里卡洛斯三世研究所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
260
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Europe, a gold open access journal, is part of The Lancet's global effort to promote healthcare quality and accessibility worldwide. It focuses on advancing clinical practice and health policy in the European region to enhance health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research advocating changes in clinical practice and health policy. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces on regional health topics, such as infection and disease prevention, healthy aging, and reducing health disparities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书