Surgical precision and clinical outcomes of 3D preformed titanium mesh in orbital blowout fracture reconstruction: a comparative study from Thailand.

Q2 Medicine
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-20 DOI:10.7181/acfs.2025.0070
Chatchai Pruksapong, Navin Klongkitkarnkha, Akaradech Attainsee, Chairat Burusapat, Suttisun Jankajorn, Nutthapong Wanichjaroen, Nuttadon Wongprakob, Rapeepat Sapruangthong, Pantip Suwansa-Ard
{"title":"Surgical precision and clinical outcomes of 3D preformed titanium mesh in orbital blowout fracture reconstruction: a comparative study from Thailand.","authors":"Chatchai Pruksapong, Navin Klongkitkarnkha, Akaradech Attainsee, Chairat Burusapat, Suttisun Jankajorn, Nutthapong Wanichjaroen, Nuttadon Wongprakob, Rapeepat Sapruangthong, Pantip Suwansa-Ard","doi":"10.7181/acfs.2025.0070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orbital floor fractures are frequently associated with head trauma, and the complex three-dimensional (3D) structure of the orbital cavity poses a significant challenge for accurate repair of orbital wall defects. Accordingly, this study aimed to compare preoperative titanium mesh bending using 3D-printed models with conventional intraoperative bending techniques, focusing on the accuracy of orbital geometry reconstruction and intraoperative efficiency, with the goal of determining potential advantages in optimizing surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study presents a comparative analysis between a prospective preoperative bending (3D pre-bent) of titanium mesh and retrospective data from conventional intraoperative bending. Clinical and radiographic evaluations of orbital geometry, along with intraoperative efficiency metrics, were assessed at both preoperative and postoperative stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four patients were included, with 32 in the 3D pre-bend titanium mesh group and 32 in the conventional bending group. Mean operative time was shorter in the 3D pre-bend group (81.07± 13.04 minutes) than in the conventional group (96.07± 4.46 minutes). The 3D pre-bend group achieved more accurate reconstruction, with orbital volume and height correction rates of 96.78% ± 4.91% and 100.62%± 3.77%, respectively, versus 94.88% ± 4.33% and 96.08% ± 5.44% in the conventional group. Patient and surgeon satisfaction was higher in the 3D pre-bend group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-bending titanium mesh using a 3D-printed model significantly reduces intraoperative time and improves orbital height correction. Additionally, this technique enhances both patient and surgeon satisfaction. However, long-term clinical outcomes remain comparable between groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":52238,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":"27 1","pages":"18-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12968646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2025.0070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Orbital floor fractures are frequently associated with head trauma, and the complex three-dimensional (3D) structure of the orbital cavity poses a significant challenge for accurate repair of orbital wall defects. Accordingly, this study aimed to compare preoperative titanium mesh bending using 3D-printed models with conventional intraoperative bending techniques, focusing on the accuracy of orbital geometry reconstruction and intraoperative efficiency, with the goal of determining potential advantages in optimizing surgical outcomes.

Methods: This study presents a comparative analysis between a prospective preoperative bending (3D pre-bent) of titanium mesh and retrospective data from conventional intraoperative bending. Clinical and radiographic evaluations of orbital geometry, along with intraoperative efficiency metrics, were assessed at both preoperative and postoperative stages.

Results: Sixty-four patients were included, with 32 in the 3D pre-bend titanium mesh group and 32 in the conventional bending group. Mean operative time was shorter in the 3D pre-bend group (81.07± 13.04 minutes) than in the conventional group (96.07± 4.46 minutes). The 3D pre-bend group achieved more accurate reconstruction, with orbital volume and height correction rates of 96.78% ± 4.91% and 100.62%± 3.77%, respectively, versus 94.88% ± 4.33% and 96.08% ± 5.44% in the conventional group. Patient and surgeon satisfaction was higher in the 3D pre-bend group.

Conclusion: Pre-bending titanium mesh using a 3D-printed model significantly reduces intraoperative time and improves orbital height correction. Additionally, this technique enhances both patient and surgeon satisfaction. However, long-term clinical outcomes remain comparable between groups.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

三维预成形钛网在眼眶爆裂性骨折重建中的手术精度和临床效果:来自泰国的比较研究。
背景:眶底骨折常与头部外伤相关,眶腔复杂的三维(3D)结构对眶壁缺损的准确修复提出了重大挑战。因此,本研究旨在比较术前使用3d打印模型的钛网弯曲与传统术中弯曲技术,重点关注眶几何重建的准确性和术中效率,以确定优化手术结果的潜在优势。方法:本研究对钛网术前预弯曲(3D预弯曲)与术中常规弯曲的回顾性数据进行对比分析。在术前和术后评估眼眶几何形状的临床和影像学评估,以及术中效率指标。结果:共纳入64例患者,其中3D预弯曲钛网组32例,常规弯曲组32例。3D预弯组平均手术时间(81.07±13.04分钟)短于常规组(96.07±4.46分钟)。3D预弯组眶体积矫正率为96.78%±4.91%,高度矫正率为100.62%±3.77%,而常规组为94.88%±4.33%,96.08%±5.44%。3D预弯曲组患者和外科医生的满意度更高。结论:使用3d打印模型预弯曲钛网可显著缩短术中时间,改善眶高度矫正。此外,该技术提高了患者和外科医生的满意度。然而,两组之间的长期临床结果仍然具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书