Orthopaedic burden in disaster: a scoping review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Joshua McIntyre, Sarah K Stewart, Arul Ramasamy
{"title":"Orthopaedic burden in disaster: a scoping review.","authors":"Joshua McIntyre, Sarah K Stewart, Arul Ramasamy","doi":"10.1136/military-2025-003157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Disasters are an increasing challenge to global healthcare systems due to climate change and geopolitical tensions. Traumatic injuries are prevalent in these crises, causing significant mortality and functional impairment. Understanding the burden of musculoskeletal trauma is crucial for enhancing disaster relief and rehabilitation efforts. This scoping review examines the orthopaedic burden in disaster.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, using PUBMED and EMBASE databases. Original studies published from 2003 to 2023 addressing orthopaedic trauma in disasters were included. Data on demographics, the anatomical distribution of injuries and orthopaedic intervention were extracted and analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 602 studies, with 10 satisfying the inclusion criteria, encompassing 24 621 patients. Earthquakes were the most common disaster type. Extremity injuries accounted for 52-93% of total injuries, with lower limb trauma predominating. In the majority of studies, the most common surgical intervention was wound debridement. The proportion of patients undergoing surgical intervention varied widely from 0.2% to 82.3%. Compartment syndrome when recorded ranged from 2% to 29.9% of cases. The quality of the studies was generally poor, with inconsistent reporting standards and limited outcome data.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Orthopaedic injuries form the largest component of trauma in disaster settings, emphasising the need for surgical expertise. Standardised reporting is vital for improving the understanding and comparison of injury profile associated with different catastrophes. Future research should focus on comprehensive reporting standards and long-term outcomes associated with disaster response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review underscores the critical role of orthopaedics in disaster response and the need for universal reporting standards to optimise care in austere environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":" ","pages":"410-416"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2025-003157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Disasters are an increasing challenge to global healthcare systems due to climate change and geopolitical tensions. Traumatic injuries are prevalent in these crises, causing significant mortality and functional impairment. Understanding the burden of musculoskeletal trauma is crucial for enhancing disaster relief and rehabilitation efforts. This scoping review examines the orthopaedic burden in disaster.

Method: A scoping review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, using PUBMED and EMBASE databases. Original studies published from 2003 to 2023 addressing orthopaedic trauma in disasters were included. Data on demographics, the anatomical distribution of injuries and orthopaedic intervention were extracted and analysed.

Results: The search identified 602 studies, with 10 satisfying the inclusion criteria, encompassing 24 621 patients. Earthquakes were the most common disaster type. Extremity injuries accounted for 52-93% of total injuries, with lower limb trauma predominating. In the majority of studies, the most common surgical intervention was wound debridement. The proportion of patients undergoing surgical intervention varied widely from 0.2% to 82.3%. Compartment syndrome when recorded ranged from 2% to 29.9% of cases. The quality of the studies was generally poor, with inconsistent reporting standards and limited outcome data.

Discussion: Orthopaedic injuries form the largest component of trauma in disaster settings, emphasising the need for surgical expertise. Standardised reporting is vital for improving the understanding and comparison of injury profile associated with different catastrophes. Future research should focus on comprehensive reporting standards and long-term outcomes associated with disaster response.

Conclusion: This review underscores the critical role of orthopaedics in disaster response and the need for universal reporting standards to optimise care in austere environments.

灾难中的骨科负担:范围审查。
由于气候变化和地缘政治紧张局势,灾害对全球医疗保健系统构成了越来越大的挑战。创伤性损伤在这些危机中很普遍,造成严重的死亡率和功能损害。了解肌肉骨骼创伤的负担对于加强救灾和重建工作至关重要。这篇综述探讨了灾害中的骨科负担。方法:使用PUBMED和EMBASE数据库,按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行范围审查。从2003年到2023年发表的关于灾害中骨科创伤的原始研究被纳入其中。统计数据,损伤的解剖分布和骨科干预提取和分析。结果:检索确定了602项研究,其中10项符合纳入标准,涵盖24621例患者。地震是最常见的灾害类型。肢体损伤占总损伤的52-93%,以下肢损伤为主。在大多数研究中,最常见的手术干预是伤口清创。接受手术干预的患者比例从0.2%到82.3%不等。筋膜间室综合征记录的病例从2%到29.9%不等。研究质量普遍较差,报告标准不一致,结果数据有限。讨论:骨科损伤是灾害环境中创伤的最大组成部分,强调了对外科专业知识的需求。标准化报告对于提高对与不同灾害相关的伤害概况的理解和比较至关重要。未来的研究应侧重于与灾害反应有关的综合报告标准和长期结果。结论:本综述强调了骨科在灾害应对中的关键作用,以及制定通用报告标准以优化恶劣环境下的护理的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bmj Military Health
Bmj Military Health MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书