Factors Influencing Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study Focusing on ER and HER-2 Status.

IF 1.9 Q4 ONCOLOGY
International Journal of Breast Cancer Pub Date : 2026-03-03 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijbc/6694023
Yadong Zhang, Shubian Qiu, Xin Wang
{"title":"Factors Influencing Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study Focusing on ER and HER-2 Status.","authors":"Yadong Zhang, Shubian Qiu, Xin Wang","doi":"10.1155/ijbc/6694023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify predictive factors of pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and to establish a \"clinical-imaging-molecular\" three-dimensional evaluation model to guide clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 55 breast cancer patients who underwent NAC at Nanyang Second People's Hospital from January 2023 to August 2024. Collected data included demographic variables (age, BMI, and menstrual status), tumor characteristics (tumor size, axillary lymph node [N] stage, histological grade, color Doppler ultrasound features including blood flow signal [CDFI], morphology, and aspect ratio), molecular markers (estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR], human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 [HER-2], and Ki-67), and treatment-related factors (chemotherapy regimen). Univariate analyses (Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test) were initially conducted to screen variables potentially associated with pCR (<i>p</i> < 0.05). To address potential multicollinearity among clinically relevant factors, binomial LASSO regression with 10-fold cross-validation was applied to select parsimonious predictors (variables with nonzero coefficients were retained), which were then incorporated into multivariate logistic regression to determine independent predictors of pCR. The discriminative power of key factors was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, with the area under the curve (AUC) as the primary metric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall pCR rate was 36.4% (20/55). Among molecular subtypes, HER-2-positive patients (40.0% of the cohort) had the highest pCR rate (73.0%, 16/22), followed by triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients (15.0% of the cohort, 50.0%, 4/8). Univariate analysis showed that N stage, chemotherapy regimen, Ki-67 index, ER status, PR status, and HER-2 status were significantly correlated with pCR (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). ROC analysis demonstrated excellent discriminative performance for ER (AUC = 0.84), HER-2 (AUC = 0.81), PR (AUC = 0.79), chemotherapy regimen (AUC = 0.71), and Ki-67 (AUC = 0.68). After LASSO-based dimension reduction, multivariate logistic regression confirmed that ER negativity (<i>p</i> = 0.039, OR = 15.079, 95% CI: 1.151-197.543) and HER-2 positivity (<i>p</i> = 0.044, OR = 0.014, 95% CI: 0.000-0.896) were independent predictors of higher pCR rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>pCR rates in breast cancer patients post-NAC vary significantly by molecular subtype. ER negativity and HER-2 positivity emerge as independent predictive factors for pCR, with ER and HER-2 exhibiting the strongest discriminative ability (AUC > 0.8). Clinicians should integrate patients' baseline clinical data, ultrasound features, and molecular markers to screen optimal NAC candidates and develop individualized strategies, thereby maximizing therapeutic benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":46159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Breast Cancer","volume":"2026 ","pages":"6694023"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12956846/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijbc/6694023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify predictive factors of pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and to establish a "clinical-imaging-molecular" three-dimensional evaluation model to guide clinical decision-making.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 55 breast cancer patients who underwent NAC at Nanyang Second People's Hospital from January 2023 to August 2024. Collected data included demographic variables (age, BMI, and menstrual status), tumor characteristics (tumor size, axillary lymph node [N] stage, histological grade, color Doppler ultrasound features including blood flow signal [CDFI], morphology, and aspect ratio), molecular markers (estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR], human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 [HER-2], and Ki-67), and treatment-related factors (chemotherapy regimen). Univariate analyses (Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test) were initially conducted to screen variables potentially associated with pCR (p < 0.05). To address potential multicollinearity among clinically relevant factors, binomial LASSO regression with 10-fold cross-validation was applied to select parsimonious predictors (variables with nonzero coefficients were retained), which were then incorporated into multivariate logistic regression to determine independent predictors of pCR. The discriminative power of key factors was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, with the area under the curve (AUC) as the primary metric.

Results: The overall pCR rate was 36.4% (20/55). Among molecular subtypes, HER-2-positive patients (40.0% of the cohort) had the highest pCR rate (73.0%, 16/22), followed by triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients (15.0% of the cohort, 50.0%, 4/8). Univariate analysis showed that N stage, chemotherapy regimen, Ki-67 index, ER status, PR status, and HER-2 status were significantly correlated with pCR (all p < 0.05). ROC analysis demonstrated excellent discriminative performance for ER (AUC = 0.84), HER-2 (AUC = 0.81), PR (AUC = 0.79), chemotherapy regimen (AUC = 0.71), and Ki-67 (AUC = 0.68). After LASSO-based dimension reduction, multivariate logistic regression confirmed that ER negativity (p = 0.039, OR = 15.079, 95% CI: 1.151-197.543) and HER-2 positivity (p = 0.044, OR = 0.014, 95% CI: 0.000-0.896) were independent predictors of higher pCR rates.

Conclusion: pCR rates in breast cancer patients post-NAC vary significantly by molecular subtype. ER negativity and HER-2 positivity emerge as independent predictive factors for pCR, with ER and HER-2 exhibiting the strongest discriminative ability (AUC > 0.8). Clinicians should integrate patients' baseline clinical data, ultrasound features, and molecular markers to screen optimal NAC candidates and develop individualized strategies, thereby maximizing therapeutic benefits.

影响乳腺癌新辅助化疗后病理完全缓解的因素:一项关注ER和HER-2状态的单中心回顾性研究
目的:探讨乳腺癌新辅助化疗(NAC)患者病理完全缓解(pCR)的预测因素,建立“临床-影像-分子”三维评价模型,指导临床决策。方法:对2023年1月至2024年8月在南阳市第二人民医院行NAC的55例乳腺癌患者进行回顾性研究。收集的资料包括人口统计学变量(年龄、BMI、月经状况)、肿瘤特征(肿瘤大小、腋窝淋巴结分期、组织学分级、彩色多普勒超声特征(包括血流信号[CDFI]、形态、宽高比)、分子标志物(雌激素受体[ER]、孕激素受体[PR]、人表皮生长因子受体-2 [HER-2]、Ki-67)以及治疗相关因素(化疗方案)。最初进行单因素分析(Pearson卡方检验或Fisher精确检验)以筛选可能与pCR相关的变量(p < 0.05)。为了解决临床相关因素之间潜在的多重共线性问题,采用10倍交叉验证的二项式LASSO回归来选择简约的预测因子(保留非零系数的变量),然后将其纳入多因素logistic回归以确定pCR的独立预测因子。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价关键因素的判别能力,以曲线下面积(AUC)为主要指标。结果:总pCR率为36.4%(20/55)。在分子亚型中,her -2阳性患者的pCR率最高(73.0%,16/22),占队列的40.0%,其次是三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者(15.0%,50.0%,4/8)。单因素分析显示,N分期、化疗方案、Ki-67指数、ER状态、PR状态、HER-2状态与pCR有显著相关(均p < 0.05)。ROC分析显示,ER (AUC = 0.84)、HER-2 (AUC = 0.81)、PR (AUC = 0.79)、化疗方案(AUC = 0.71)和Ki-67 (AUC = 0.68)具有良好的判别性能。基于lasso的降维后,多因素logistic回归证实,ER阴性(p = 0.039, OR = 15.079, 95% CI: 1.151-197.543)和HER-2阳性(p = 0.044, OR = 0.014, 95% CI: 0.000-0.896)是较高pCR率的独立预测因子。结论:不同分子亚型乳腺癌nac后患者pCR率差异显著。ER阴性和HER-2阳性是pCR的独立预测因子,其中ER和HER-2的判别能力最强(AUC > 0.8)。临床医生应综合患者的基线临床数据、超声特征和分子标记,筛选最佳NAC候选药物,制定个体化策略,从而最大限度地提高治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for scientists, clinicians, and health care professionals working in breast cancer research and management. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to molecular pathology, genomics, genetic predisposition, screening and diagnosis, disease markers, drug sensitivity and resistance, as well as novel therapies, with a specific focus on molecular targeted agents and immune therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书