[DiGA, non-DiGA and realities of practice : A questionnaire study on opportunities and challenges of health apps in the field of mental healthcare].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Gina Vollert, Bianca Jansky, Ömer Akif, Paul Wolf, Verina Wild
{"title":"[DiGA, non-DiGA and realities of practice : A questionnaire study on opportunities and challenges of health apps in the field of mental healthcare].","authors":"Gina Vollert, Bianca Jansky, Ömer Akif, Paul Wolf, Verina Wild","doi":"10.1007/s00115-026-01955-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digitalization in the German healthcare system is advancing. Digital services are increasingly being incorporated into mental healthcare.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>This questionnaire study examined the assessment of professionals working in mental healthcare regarding the opportunities and challenges of digital health services. It takes digital health applications (DiGA) and non-DiGA (apps and web services without reimbursement and governmental regulation) into account.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The online questionnaire included e.g. Likert scales for assessing the success of therapy, the quality of care, the doctor-patient relationship and the willingness to undergo further training. The quantitative questions were supplemented by free text comment fields.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on 200 participants the analysis shows that a slight majority do not incorporate digital services into their therapy. The majority of respondents stated that digital services can support prevention and psychoeducation; however, whether they could meet the requirements in other areas of psychotherapy was mostly considered questionable. Challenges were largely seen in the high costs and insufficient information available to practitioners. In addition, the risk of exacerbating health inequalities (e.g., due to insufficient digital literacy) was discussed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>It can be concluded that digital services can certainly add value to mental healthcare; however, the sustainable integration into care is linked to improvements in structural conditions (such as the cost-benefit ratio and better information for those providing treatment) as well as consideration and compensation for socially unequal access conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-026-01955-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digitalization in the German healthcare system is advancing. Digital services are increasingly being incorporated into mental healthcare.

Research question: This questionnaire study examined the assessment of professionals working in mental healthcare regarding the opportunities and challenges of digital health services. It takes digital health applications (DiGA) and non-DiGA (apps and web services without reimbursement and governmental regulation) into account.

Method: The online questionnaire included e.g. Likert scales for assessing the success of therapy, the quality of care, the doctor-patient relationship and the willingness to undergo further training. The quantitative questions were supplemented by free text comment fields.

Results: Based on 200 participants the analysis shows that a slight majority do not incorporate digital services into their therapy. The majority of respondents stated that digital services can support prevention and psychoeducation; however, whether they could meet the requirements in other areas of psychotherapy was mostly considered questionable. Challenges were largely seen in the high costs and insufficient information available to practitioners. In addition, the risk of exacerbating health inequalities (e.g., due to insufficient digital literacy) was discussed.

Discussion: It can be concluded that digital services can certainly add value to mental healthcare; however, the sustainable integration into care is linked to improvements in structural conditions (such as the cost-benefit ratio and better information for those providing treatment) as well as consideration and compensation for socially unequal access conditions.

[DiGA,非DiGA和实践的现实:关于健康应用程序在精神卫生领域的机遇和挑战的问卷调查研究]。
背景:数字化在德国医疗保健系统正在推进。数字服务越来越多地被纳入精神保健。研究问题:本问卷研究调查了对从事精神卫生保健工作的专业人员关于数字卫生服务的机遇和挑战的评估。它考虑了数字健康应用程序(DiGA)和非DiGA(没有报销和政府监管的应用程序和网络服务)。方法:采用李克特量表(Likert scale)等在线问卷,对治疗效果、护理质量、医患关系和接受进一步培训的意愿进行评估。定量问题由自由文本评论字段补充。结果:基于200名参与者的分析显示,略占多数的人没有将数字服务纳入他们的治疗中。大多数受访者表示,数字服务可以支持预防和心理教育;然而,他们是否能满足心理治疗其他领域的要求,大多被认为是有问题的。挑战主要体现在高成本和从业者可获得的信息不足。此外,还讨论了加剧保健不平等的风险(例如,由于数字素养不足)。讨论:可以得出结论,数字服务肯定可以增加精神卫生保健的价值;然而,可持续融入护理与结构性条件的改善(例如成本效益比和提供治疗的人获得更好的信息)以及对社会不平等获取条件的考虑和补偿有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nervenarzt
Nervenarzt 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书