Socioecological Perspectives on Healing After Child Sexual Abuse: An Application of the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Framework.

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Child Sexual Abuse Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-05 DOI:10.1080/10538712.2026.2638980
Kristi K Westphaln, Marie Masotya, Bridget Haas, Wendy Regoeczi, Lolita McDavid, Jennifer Johnson, Sarah Ronis
{"title":"Socioecological Perspectives on Healing After Child Sexual Abuse: An Application of the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Framework.","authors":"Kristi K Westphaln, Marie Masotya, Bridget Haas, Wendy Regoeczi, Lolita McDavid, Jennifer Johnson, Sarah Ronis","doi":"10.1080/10538712.2026.2638980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children who experience childhood sexual abuse (CSA) and their non-offending family members are frequently referred to Children's Advocacy Centers (CACs) for multisector service coordination and evidence-based treatments. Little is known about how interactions with the CAC model impact healing after CSA from a socioecological context (child, parent/caregiver, family). This qualitative study explored facilitators and barriers to healing after CSA within a socioecological context among families that received care at an urban Midwestern CAC. Semi-structured interviews (<i>n</i> = 15) were conducted with parents of children who experienced CSA and received services at the CCAC. Data was analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six phase method of thematic analysis and a family-centered adaptation of the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Framework. Findings reflected three main themes: healing, facilitators and barriers, and opportunities for CACs to promote healing after CSA. In conclusion, CAC-based interventions that incorporate a socioecological approach and community-engaged perspectives may reduce barriers to care and promote healing after CSA for children, parents, and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":47645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Sexual Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"91-116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Sexual Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2026.2638980","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children who experience childhood sexual abuse (CSA) and their non-offending family members are frequently referred to Children's Advocacy Centers (CACs) for multisector service coordination and evidence-based treatments. Little is known about how interactions with the CAC model impact healing after CSA from a socioecological context (child, parent/caregiver, family). This qualitative study explored facilitators and barriers to healing after CSA within a socioecological context among families that received care at an urban Midwestern CAC. Semi-structured interviews (n = 15) were conducted with parents of children who experienced CSA and received services at the CCAC. Data was analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six phase method of thematic analysis and a family-centered adaptation of the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Framework. Findings reflected three main themes: healing, facilitators and barriers, and opportunities for CACs to promote healing after CSA. In conclusion, CAC-based interventions that incorporate a socioecological approach and community-engaged perspectives may reduce barriers to care and promote healing after CSA for children, parents, and families.

儿童性虐待后康复的社会生态学观点:国家少数民族健康和健康差异研究框架研究所的应用。
遭受儿童期性虐待(CSA)的儿童及其无犯罪行为的家庭成员经常被转介到儿童倡导中心(CACs)进行多部门服务协调和循证治疗。从社会生态环境(儿童、父母/照顾者、家庭)来看,与CAC模型的相互作用如何影响CSA后的愈合,我们知之甚少。本定性研究探讨了在中西部城市CAC接受治疗的家庭在社会生态背景下CSA后愈合的促进因素和障碍。半结构化访谈(n = 15)对在CCAC接受服务并经历过CSA的儿童的父母进行。数据分析使用Braun和Clarke的六阶段主题分析方法和以家庭为中心的国家少数民族健康研究所和健康差异研究框架。研究结果反映了三个主要主题:愈合,促进因素和障碍,以及CACs促进CSA后愈合的机会。总之,结合社会生态学方法和社区参与观点的基于CSA的干预措施可以减少儿童、父母和家庭在CSA后的护理障碍并促进康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Child Sexual Abuse is interdisciplinary and provides an essential interface for researchers, academicians, attorneys, clinicians, and practitioners. The journal advocates for increased networking in the sexual abuse field, greater dissemination of information and research, a higher priority for this international epidemic, and development of effective assessment, intervention, and prevention programs. Divided into sections to provide clear information, the journal covers research issues, clinical issues, legal issues, prevention programs, case studies, and brief reports, focusing on three subject groups - child and adolescent victims of sexual abuse or incest, adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse or incest, and sexual abuse or incest offenders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书