Applying distinct approaches to racial and ethnic classification to the surveillance of obstetric and neonatal outcomes in the U.S. military, 2010-2021.

Q3 Medicine
MSMR Pub Date : 2026-02-24
Celeste J Romano, Clinton Hall, Monica Burrell, Anna T Bukowinski, Jackielyn Lanning, Sandra Maduforo, Sandra Michelle Magallon, Zeina G Khodr, Gia R Gumbs, Ava Marie S Conlin
{"title":"Applying distinct approaches to racial and ethnic classification to the surveillance of obstetric and neonatal outcomes in the U.S. military, 2010-2021.","authors":"Celeste J Romano, Clinton Hall, Monica Burrell, Anna T Bukowinski, Jackielyn Lanning, Sandra Maduforo, Sandra Michelle Magallon, Zeina G Khodr, Gia R Gumbs, Ava Marie S Conlin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditional, mutually exclusive approaches to racial and ethnic classification obscure important differences within major demographic groups and among multiracial populations. This study offers a novel examination of obstetric and neonatal outcomes among pregnant U.S. military service members, by applying multiple approaches to racial and ethnic classification and presenting disaggregated data. Overall, 235,608 births were identified among pregnant service members from 2010 through 2021. Inclusion of service members who identified with each racial group, whether alone or in combination with any other group, increased the American Indian or Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander birth populations by 209.7% and 94.0%, respectively, when compared to mutually exclusive classifications. Prevalences of obstetric outcomes such as cesarean delivery varied among racial and ethnic groups, particularly Asian and Latino populations, for example, Asian Indian, 36.7%; Filipino, 32.3%; Chinese, 26.5%; Puerto Rican, 30.2%; Mexican, 23.2%; and between distinct multiracial populations. Disaggregated estimates ultimately increased visibility of multiracial and Native service members and elucidated patterns indiscernible in aggregated data. Wider adoption of disaggregated racial and ethnic data methods is needed to improve understanding of health outcomes in the Military Health System. Reporting of non-mutually exclusive racial and ethnic groups as well as disaggregated Asian, Hispanic or Latino, and multiracial populations elucidates important differences in obstetric and neonatal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":38856,"journal":{"name":"MSMR","volume":"33 1","pages":"12-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13016958/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MSMR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional, mutually exclusive approaches to racial and ethnic classification obscure important differences within major demographic groups and among multiracial populations. This study offers a novel examination of obstetric and neonatal outcomes among pregnant U.S. military service members, by applying multiple approaches to racial and ethnic classification and presenting disaggregated data. Overall, 235,608 births were identified among pregnant service members from 2010 through 2021. Inclusion of service members who identified with each racial group, whether alone or in combination with any other group, increased the American Indian or Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander birth populations by 209.7% and 94.0%, respectively, when compared to mutually exclusive classifications. Prevalences of obstetric outcomes such as cesarean delivery varied among racial and ethnic groups, particularly Asian and Latino populations, for example, Asian Indian, 36.7%; Filipino, 32.3%; Chinese, 26.5%; Puerto Rican, 30.2%; Mexican, 23.2%; and between distinct multiracial populations. Disaggregated estimates ultimately increased visibility of multiracial and Native service members and elucidated patterns indiscernible in aggregated data. Wider adoption of disaggregated racial and ethnic data methods is needed to improve understanding of health outcomes in the Military Health System. Reporting of non-mutually exclusive racial and ethnic groups as well as disaggregated Asian, Hispanic or Latino, and multiracial populations elucidates important differences in obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

2010-2021年美国军队产科和新生儿结局监测应用不同的种族和民族分类方法
传统的、相互排斥的种族和族裔分类方法掩盖了主要人口群体内部和多种族人口之间的重要差异。本研究通过应用多种方法对种族和民族进行分类,并提供分类数据,对怀孕的美国军人的产科和新生儿结局进行了新颖的检查。总体而言,从2010年到2021年,怀孕的服役人员中有235,608人出生。与相互排斥的分类相比,无论是单独还是与任何其他种族相结合,将每个种族认同的服役人员包括在内,都使美国印第安人、阿拉斯加原住民、夏威夷原住民或太平洋岛民的出生人口分别增加了209.7%和94.0%。剖宫产等产科结果的患病率在种族和族裔群体中有所不同,特别是亚洲和拉丁裔人群,例如,亚洲印第安人为36.7%;菲律宾,32.3%;中国人,26.5%;波多黎各,30.2%;墨西哥,23.2%;在不同的多种族人群之间。分类估计最终增加了多种族和土著服役人员的可见性,并阐明了在汇总数据中无法识别的模式。需要更广泛地采用分类的种族和民族数据方法,以提高对军事卫生系统健康结果的了解。非相互排斥的种族和族裔群体以及分类的亚洲人、西班牙裔或拉丁裔和多种族人群的报告阐明了产科和新生儿结局的重要差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MSMR
MSMR Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书