The Harm We Cause: Spotlighting the Detrimental Consequences of Malicious Envy in Academic Medicine.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jamiu O Busari
{"title":"The Harm We Cause: Spotlighting the Detrimental Consequences of Malicious Envy in Academic Medicine.","authors":"Jamiu O Busari","doi":"10.3121/cmr.2025.2075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Phenomenon:</b> In academic medicine and healthcare, individuals may encounter peers or superiors who obstruct, hinder, or undermine their professional advancement. This phenomenon, termed <i>Career Sabotaging</i> (CS), reflects a form of malicious envy that occurs regardless of a subject's efforts toward career growth or promotion. Prompted by real-world experiences, this paper examines the conceptual understanding and defining components of CS.<b>Approach:</b> An open-source online survey was conducted over 2 months with 109 anonymous respondents. The 18-item questionnaire observed whether CS was a recognized phenomenon in academia and medicine. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data.<b>Findings:</b> Of the respondents, 87 (79.8%) were familiar with CS; 81 (74.3%) had personally experienced it, and 92 (84.4%) had observed it in peers. Most reported incidents occurred in non-academic professional workplaces (43.3% and 37%, respectively). The observations corroborated the description of the phenomenon of Career Sabotage.<b>Insights:</b> The findings provide preliminary support that many professionals recognize and label a pattern of career obstruction as CS. The survey did not investigate whether those who reportedly experienced CS were disproportionately targeted by ethnicity, gender, age, ability, or sexual orientation. These questions and more should form part of future inquiry in understanding CS.</p>","PeriodicalId":47429,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine & Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13061305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.2025.2075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phenomenon: In academic medicine and healthcare, individuals may encounter peers or superiors who obstruct, hinder, or undermine their professional advancement. This phenomenon, termed Career Sabotaging (CS), reflects a form of malicious envy that occurs regardless of a subject's efforts toward career growth or promotion. Prompted by real-world experiences, this paper examines the conceptual understanding and defining components of CS.Approach: An open-source online survey was conducted over 2 months with 109 anonymous respondents. The 18-item questionnaire observed whether CS was a recognized phenomenon in academia and medicine. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data.Findings: Of the respondents, 87 (79.8%) were familiar with CS; 81 (74.3%) had personally experienced it, and 92 (84.4%) had observed it in peers. Most reported incidents occurred in non-academic professional workplaces (43.3% and 37%, respectively). The observations corroborated the description of the phenomenon of Career Sabotage.Insights: The findings provide preliminary support that many professionals recognize and label a pattern of career obstruction as CS. The survey did not investigate whether those who reportedly experienced CS were disproportionately targeted by ethnicity, gender, age, ability, or sexual orientation. These questions and more should form part of future inquiry in understanding CS.

我们造成的伤害:强调学术医学中恶意嫉妒的有害后果。
现象:在学术医学和医疗保健中,个人可能会遇到同事或上级阻碍、阻碍或破坏他们的职业发展。这种现象被称为职业破坏(CS),反映了一种恶意嫉妒的形式,无论一个人在职业发展或晋升方面做出了多大的努力,这种嫉妒都会发生。在现实经验的推动下,本文探讨了CS的概念理解和定义组件。方法:对109名匿名受访者进行了为期2个月的开源在线调查。问卷共18项,观察CS是否为学术界和医学界公认的现象。采用描述性统计对数据进行汇总。调查结果:有87人(79.8%)熟悉计算机科学;81人(74.3%)亲身经历过,92人(84.4%)观察过同伴。大多数报告的事件发生在非学术专业工作场所(分别为43.3%和37%)。观察结果证实了对职业破坏现象的描述。见解:研究结果为许多专业人士认识到并将职业障碍模式标记为CS提供了初步支持。该调查没有调查那些据称经历过CS的人是否因种族、性别、年龄、能力或性取向而不成比例地成为攻击目标。这些问题以及更多的问题应该成为理解计算机科学的未来探究的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Medicine & Research
Clinical Medicine & Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Clinical Medicine & Research is a peer reviewed publication of original scientific medical research that is relevant to a broad audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Articles are published quarterly in the following topics: -Medicine -Clinical Research -Evidence-based Medicine -Preventive Medicine -Translational Medicine -Rural Health -Case Reports -Epidemiology -Basic science -History of Medicine -The Art of Medicine -Non-Clinical Aspects of Medicine & Science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书