Sex Differences in Preferred Under-Correction of Contact Lenses and Their Potential Relevance to Presbyopia Management.

IF 2.4 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Clinical Optometry Pub Date : 2026-02-27 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTO.S575883
Masahiko Ayaki, Akiko Hanyuda, Kazuno Negishi
{"title":"Sex Differences in Preferred Under-Correction of Contact Lenses and Their Potential Relevance to Presbyopia Management.","authors":"Masahiko Ayaki, Akiko Hanyuda, Kazuno Negishi","doi":"10.2147/OPTO.S575883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine sex differences in preferred refraction for presbyopic correction in daily life, determined by the power of prescribed contact lenses.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Near add power and preferred contact lens power were examined in participants aged from 20 to 79 years who were divided into three age groups (20-39, 40-59, and 60-79 years). The difference (Δ) in lens power (preferred corrective power of contact lens - full correction power) was compared between both sexes in each age group. Regression analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between Δ lens power and ocular parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 768 men and 2314 women were enrolled in the study. Sex differences were prominent in the 40-59 year age group; namely Δ lens power was larger (<i>P</i> < 0.05) and visual acuity with contact lenses was lower in women than men (<i>P</i> < 0.05), whilst astigmatic errors and anisometropia were greater in men than women. Mean near add power was similar between both sexes in all age groups. Ocular surface parameters were worse in women compared with men, except for the Shirmer test. The results of regression analyses indicated that Δ lens power for women was associated with myopic spherical equivalent, astigmatic errors, anisometropia, near add power, contact lens power, and visual acuity with contact lenses. For men, Δ lens power was associated with myopic spherical equivalent, astigmatic errors, visual acuity with contact lenses, and tear break-up time. Age was not a significant factor for either sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current results revealed sex differences in the preferred power of contact lenses for presbyopic correction for optimal daily living. The magnitude of under-correction was significantly greater in women than men aged 40 to 59 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":43701,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Optometry","volume":"18 ","pages":"575883"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12956865/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S575883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine sex differences in preferred refraction for presbyopic correction in daily life, determined by the power of prescribed contact lenses.

Patients and methods: Near add power and preferred contact lens power were examined in participants aged from 20 to 79 years who were divided into three age groups (20-39, 40-59, and 60-79 years). The difference (Δ) in lens power (preferred corrective power of contact lens - full correction power) was compared between both sexes in each age group. Regression analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between Δ lens power and ocular parameters.

Results: A total of 768 men and 2314 women were enrolled in the study. Sex differences were prominent in the 40-59 year age group; namely Δ lens power was larger (P < 0.05) and visual acuity with contact lenses was lower in women than men (P < 0.05), whilst astigmatic errors and anisometropia were greater in men than women. Mean near add power was similar between both sexes in all age groups. Ocular surface parameters were worse in women compared with men, except for the Shirmer test. The results of regression analyses indicated that Δ lens power for women was associated with myopic spherical equivalent, astigmatic errors, anisometropia, near add power, contact lens power, and visual acuity with contact lenses. For men, Δ lens power was associated with myopic spherical equivalent, astigmatic errors, visual acuity with contact lenses, and tear break-up time. Age was not a significant factor for either sex.

Conclusion: The current results revealed sex differences in the preferred power of contact lenses for presbyopic correction for optimal daily living. The magnitude of under-correction was significantly greater in women than men aged 40 to 59 years.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

偏好欠矫正隐形眼镜的性别差异及其与老花眼治疗的潜在相关性。
目的:本研究的目的是确定日常生活中由处方隐形眼镜的度数决定的老花眼矫正首选屈光度的性别差异。患者和方法:对年龄在20- 79岁之间的参与者(20-39岁、40-59岁和60-79岁)进行近瞳度数和首选隐形眼镜度数的检查。比较各年龄组男女镜片度数(隐形眼镜首选矫正度数-全矫正度数)的差异(Δ)。回归分析Δ晶状体度数与眼参数的关系。结果:共有768名男性和2314名女性纳入研究。40 ~ 59岁年龄组性别差异显著;女性配戴隐形眼镜的晶状度大于男性(P < 0.05),视力低于男性(P < 0.05),而男性的散光和屈光参差高于女性。在所有年龄组中,男女之间的平均近加力相似。除了Shirmer测试外,女性的眼表参数比男性差。回归分析结果表明,Δ女性晶状体度数与近视球当量、散光误差、屈光参差、近视眼度数、隐形眼镜度数和配戴隐形眼镜的视力有关。对于男性,Δ晶状体度数与近视球形当量、散光误差、隐形眼镜视力和泪液破裂时间有关。年龄对男女都不是显著因素。结论:目前的研究结果揭示了性别差异的隐形眼镜的最佳度数矫正老花眼的最佳日常生活。40 ~ 59岁女性矫正不足的程度明显大于男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Optometry
Clinical Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
29
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Optometry is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on clinical optometry. All aspects of patient care are addressed within the journal as well as the practice of optometry including economic and business analyses. Basic and clinical research papers are published that cover all aspects of optics, refraction and its application to the theory and practice of optometry. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Theoretical and applied optics, Delivery of patient care in optometry practice, Refraction and correction of errors, Screening and preventative aspects of eye disease, Extended clinical roles for optometrists including shared care and provision of medications, Teaching and training optometrists, International aspects of optometry, Business practice, Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction, Health economic evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书