Deep Learning Myocardial Segmentation in 3D Whole-Heart Joint T1/T2 Mapping: Comparison of nnU-Net and MA-SAM.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
G Carlota Rivera, Alina Hua, René M Botnar, Claudia Prieto
{"title":"Deep Learning Myocardial Segmentation in 3D Whole-Heart Joint T1/T2 Mapping: Comparison of nnU-Net and MA-SAM.","authors":"G Carlota Rivera, Alina Hua, René M Botnar, Claudia Prieto","doi":"10.1002/nbm.70252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compares two advanced deep learning models, nnU-Net and MA-SAM, for automatic segmentation of the left ventricle (LV) myocardium using 3D whole-heart T1 and T2 mapping, with the goal of evaluating their performance in terms of segmentation metrics and computational efficiency. The dataset consisted of 3D whole-heart joint T1/T2 maps from 55 subjects (15 healthy and 40 with suspected cardiovascular disease), with manual segmentations performed by an experienced clinical reader. For model development, 45 subjects were used for training, while five subjects were used for validation in each run. A cross-validation strategy with 10 independent training runs was employed, such that all subjects were used for validation across different folds. An independent hold-out test set of five subjects, which were never used during training or validation, was reserved for final testing. The fourth interleaved volume, which provided the highest myocardial-blood contrast, was used in both networks. Segmentation performance was assessed using Dice similarity score, intersection over union (IoU), and Hausdorff distance at 95%. T1 and T2 maps were generated by matching water images to a simulated dictionary and compared to manual segmentations. Both models achieved comparable segmentation performance, with nnU-Net obtaining a Dice score (DSC) of 0.91 compared to 0.90 for MA-SAM, and IoU values of 0.83 and 0.82, respectively. Regarding boundary accuracy, nnU-Net achieved a lower Hausdorff distance (HD95) of 1.64 mm, compared to 1.77 mm for MA-SAM. In addition, nnU-Net demonstrated markedly greater computational efficiency, requiring significantly less training time (5 h vs. 9 h for MA-SAM) and shorter inference time (3.67 s vs. 76.67 s), underscoring its suitability for clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19309,"journal":{"name":"NMR in Biomedicine","volume":"39 4","pages":"e70252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NMR in Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compares two advanced deep learning models, nnU-Net and MA-SAM, for automatic segmentation of the left ventricle (LV) myocardium using 3D whole-heart T1 and T2 mapping, with the goal of evaluating their performance in terms of segmentation metrics and computational efficiency. The dataset consisted of 3D whole-heart joint T1/T2 maps from 55 subjects (15 healthy and 40 with suspected cardiovascular disease), with manual segmentations performed by an experienced clinical reader. For model development, 45 subjects were used for training, while five subjects were used for validation in each run. A cross-validation strategy with 10 independent training runs was employed, such that all subjects were used for validation across different folds. An independent hold-out test set of five subjects, which were never used during training or validation, was reserved for final testing. The fourth interleaved volume, which provided the highest myocardial-blood contrast, was used in both networks. Segmentation performance was assessed using Dice similarity score, intersection over union (IoU), and Hausdorff distance at 95%. T1 and T2 maps were generated by matching water images to a simulated dictionary and compared to manual segmentations. Both models achieved comparable segmentation performance, with nnU-Net obtaining a Dice score (DSC) of 0.91 compared to 0.90 for MA-SAM, and IoU values of 0.83 and 0.82, respectively. Regarding boundary accuracy, nnU-Net achieved a lower Hausdorff distance (HD95) of 1.64 mm, compared to 1.77 mm for MA-SAM. In addition, nnU-Net demonstrated markedly greater computational efficiency, requiring significantly less training time (5 h vs. 9 h for MA-SAM) and shorter inference time (3.67 s vs. 76.67 s), underscoring its suitability for clinical applications.

全心关节T1/T2三维映射中的深度学习心肌分割:nnU-Net和MA-SAM的比较。
本研究比较了两种先进的深度学习模型,nnU-Net和MA-SAM,利用3D全心T1和T2映射对左心室(LV)心肌进行自动分割,目的是评估它们在分割指标和计算效率方面的性能。该数据集由55名受试者(15名健康受试者和40名疑似心血管疾病患者)的3D全心脏关节T1/T2图组成,由经验丰富的临床读者手动分割。在模型开发中,45名受试者用于训练,而5名受试者在每次运行中用于验证。采用10个独立训练运行的交叉验证策略,这样所有受试者都被用于跨不同折叠的验证。在训练或验证期间从未使用过的5个受试者的独立保留测试集被保留用于最终测试。在两个网络中都使用了提供最高心肌血液对比的第四个交错容积。使用Dice相似度评分、交汇超过联合(IoU)和Hausdorff距离(95%)来评估分割性能。通过将水体图像与模拟字典匹配生成T1和T2地图,并与人工分割进行比较。两种模型都取得了相当的分割性能,nnU-Net的Dice得分(DSC)为0.91,而MA-SAM为0.90,IoU值分别为0.83和0.82。在边界精度方面,nnU-Net的Hausdorff距离(HD95)较低,为1.64 mm,而MA-SAM的Hausdorff距离为1.77 mm。此外,nnU-Net显示出明显更高的计算效率,所需的训练时间显著减少(MA-SAM为5小时,MA-SAM为9小时),推理时间显著缩短(3.67秒,MA-SAM为76.67秒),强调了其临床应用的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NMR in Biomedicine
NMR in Biomedicine 医学-光谱学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.30%
发文量
209
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: NMR in Biomedicine is a journal devoted to the publication of original full-length papers, rapid communications and review articles describing the development of magnetic resonance spectroscopy or imaging methods or their use to investigate physiological, biochemical, biophysical or medical problems. Topics for submitted papers should be in one of the following general categories: (a) development of methods and instrumentation for MR of biological systems; (b) studies of normal or diseased organs, tissues or cells; (c) diagnosis or treatment of disease. Reports may cover work on patients or healthy human subjects, in vivo animal experiments, studies of isolated organs or cultured cells, analysis of tissue extracts, NMR theory, experimental techniques, or instrumentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书