Comparison of Complications and Morbidity between Hand-Sewn and Stapled Anastomosis after Transhiatal Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

Q3 Medicine
Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-30 DOI:10.34172/mejdd.2025.432
Parastou Shahryari, Mohsen Eshraghi, Seyed Jalal Eshagh Hosseini, Mostafa Vahedian, Farbod Eshraghi, Mohammad Hosein Atarod
{"title":"Comparison of Complications and Morbidity between Hand-Sewn and Stapled Anastomosis after Transhiatal Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.","authors":"Parastou Shahryari, Mohsen Eshraghi, Seyed Jalal Eshagh Hosseini, Mostafa Vahedian, Farbod Eshraghi, Mohammad Hosein Atarod","doi":"10.34172/mejdd.2025.432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the increasing adoption of minimally invasive techniques in esophageal cancer (EC) surgery, comparing the complications and morbidity between hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) and stapled anastomosis (SA) after transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) is of significant clinical importance. This study aimed to evaluate these two techniques in terms of postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, hospital stay, and other related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 110 patients with EC who underwent THE at Shahid Beheshti Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: those undergoing HSA and those undergoing SA. Demographic, surgical, and postoperative complication data were extracted from medical records and analyzed using SPSS software version 25. Quantitative variables were compared using the independent t-test, while qualitative variables were assessed using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test. A <i>P</i> value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated that while the stapled method showed superiority in reducing recovery time and short-term complications, there was no significant difference in readmission rates between the two groups. This aligns with the findings of Law and colleagues, which suggest that readmission rates and disease recurrence are similar across different surgical methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both anastomosis techniques are comparable in terms of safety and potential for reoperation; however, further research is needed to investigate long-term complications. The findings of this study highlight the impact of body mass index and readmission rates on the choice of surgical method. Future research should address these discrepancies and include larger, more diverse populations in long-term assessments to achieve more definitive results regarding the comparative effectiveness of these techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":18517,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases","volume":"17 3","pages":"204-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12958306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/mejdd.2025.432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the increasing adoption of minimally invasive techniques in esophageal cancer (EC) surgery, comparing the complications and morbidity between hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) and stapled anastomosis (SA) after transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) is of significant clinical importance. This study aimed to evaluate these two techniques in terms of postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, hospital stay, and other related outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 110 patients with EC who underwent THE at Shahid Beheshti Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: those undergoing HSA and those undergoing SA. Demographic, surgical, and postoperative complication data were extracted from medical records and analyzed using SPSS software version 25. Quantitative variables were compared using the independent t-test, while qualitative variables were assessed using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test. A P value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The results indicated that while the stapled method showed superiority in reducing recovery time and short-term complications, there was no significant difference in readmission rates between the two groups. This aligns with the findings of Law and colleagues, which suggest that readmission rates and disease recurrence are similar across different surgical methods.

Conclusion: Both anastomosis techniques are comparable in terms of safety and potential for reoperation; however, further research is needed to investigate long-term complications. The findings of this study highlight the impact of body mass index and readmission rates on the choice of surgical method. Future research should address these discrepancies and include larger, more diverse populations in long-term assessments to achieve more definitive results regarding the comparative effectiveness of these techniques.

食管癌经食管切除术后手缝吻合与吻合器吻合的并发症及发病率比较。
背景:随着微创技术在食管癌(EC)手术中的应用越来越多,比较经食管切除术(the)后手工缝合吻合(HSA)和吻合器吻合(SA)的并发症和发病率具有重要的临床意义。本研究旨在评估这两种技术的术后并发症、吻合口漏、住院时间和其他相关结果。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了在Shahid Beheshti医院接受THE的110例EC患者。患者分为两组:HSA组和SA组。从医疗记录中提取人口统计学、手术和术后并发症数据,并使用SPSS软件25版进行分析。定量变量采用独立t检验进行比较,而定性变量采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行评估。结果:两组患者再入院率差异无统计学意义,但装订法在缩短恢复时间和减少短期并发症方面具有优势。这与Law及其同事的研究结果一致,即不同手术方法的再入院率和疾病复发率相似。结论:两种吻合方式在安全性和再手术可能性方面具有可比性;然而,需要进一步的研究来调查长期并发症。本研究结果强调了体重指数和再入院率对手术方法选择的影响。未来的研究应解决这些差异,并在长期评估中纳入更大、更多样化的人群,以获得关于这些技术相对有效性的更明确的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases
Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书